Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Roger Burton West
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:38:03AM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: You're either going to update the atime, or you have to update the ctime to reset the atime, or you have to read the raw disk somehow. Or use something other than mutt to tell you which mailboxes have new messages in them.

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Simon Wistow
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:51:44AM +, Roger Burton West said: Or use something other than mutt to tell you which mailboxes have new messages in them. xbuffy/gbuffy, if you're using an X desktop, for example. I'm, err, not. Unless I decide to run an X connection over ssh aswell. Which I

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Steve Keay
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:51:44AM +, Roger Burton West wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:38:03AM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: You're either going to update the atime, or you have to update the ctime to reset the atime, or you have to read the raw disk somehow. On a system where I am

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Natalie Ford
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:29:25AM +, Simon Wistow wrote: Unless I decide to run an X connection over ssh aswell. Which I don't want to. You can run x over ssh? Kewl! How? -- Natalie Ford .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread the hatter
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Natalie Ford wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:29:25AM +, Simon Wistow wrote: Unless I decide to run an X connection over ssh aswell. Which I don't want to. You can run x over ssh? Kewl! How? Just make sure your ssh server and client both have it enabled

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Richard Clamp
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:29:25AM +, Simon Wistow wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:51:44AM +, Roger Burton West said: Or use something other than mutt to tell you which mailboxes have new messages in them. xbuffy/gbuffy, if you're using an X desktop, for example. I'm, err,

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
the == the hatter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the Just make sure your ssh server and client both have it enabled the (ForwardX11 yes and X11Forwarding yes) and then run programs as normal the on the remote server. Then up they pop, encrypted in transit, on your the local display. And

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Natalie Ford
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:30:38PM +, the hatter wrote: Just make sure your ssh server and client both have it enabled (ForwardX11 yes and X11Forwarding yes) and then run programs as normal on the remote server. Then up they pop, encrypted in transit, on your local display. No need to

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Chris Devers
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Natalie Ford wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:30:38PM +, the hatter wrote: Just make sure your ssh server and client both have it enabled (ForwardX11 yes and X11Forwarding yes) and then run programs as normal on the remote server. Then up they pop, encrypted in

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Mike Jarvis
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 17:05, Chris Devers wrote: On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Natalie Ford wrote: So, I need to be running X on my client end? I run ssh from windoze... Last time I checked, there weren't any good freeware ports of Win32/X, but maybe someone has managed to compile Xfree86 under

ssh (was Re: rsync and mutt woes)

2002-02-25 Thread Mark Fowler
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Natalie Ford wrote: So, I need to be running X on my client end? I run ssh from windoze... No you need to be running an XServer on your server end[1]. There are many X servers that work with Windows, and many ssh clients that will do the forwarding to these clients.

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Mark Fowler
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Chris Devers wrote: but it's super easy to set up and the main performance constraint seems to be plain old bandwidth, as opposed to whatever ram disc space you'd need to get X going reasonably well on top of Windows... The real killer is latency. I've had problems