On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 14:33, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 01:35:37PM +, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
> > Also, I would guess that well written C++ is faster than well written
> > perl for some tasks.
>
> For nigh-on all tasks! But remember, programmer time costs a lot more tha
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 01:35:37PM +, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
> Also, I would guess that well written C++ is faster than well written
> perl for some tasks.
For nigh-on all tasks! But remember, programmer time costs a lot more than
run time.
>And I would guess based on