2010/2/2 Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker ilm...@ilmari.org
Because I suck and didn't get around to booking any other pub in time,
we're going back to the Gunmakers this Thursday (4 February), where the
lovely landlord Jeff always welcomes us with open arms, foamy beers,
non-foamy ciders and tasty
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:17:04AM +, Dan wrote:
2010/2/2 Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker ilm...@ilmari.org
Because I suck and didn't get around to booking any other pub in time,
we're going back to the Gunmakers this Thursday (4 February), where the
lovely landlord Jeff always welcomes us
Dan danthegeek...@googlemail.com writes:
[snip]
Sounds fantastic but why post so late :-(
[snip]
2010/2/2 Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker ilm...@ilmari.org
Because I suck and didn't get around to booking any other pub in time,
[snip]
I hope this answers your question :-)
--
ilmari
A
On 4 February 2010 10:17, Dan danthegeek...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/2/2 Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker ilm...@ilmari.org
Because I suck and didn't get around to booking any other pub in time,
we're going back to the Gunmakers this Thursday (4 February), where the
lovely landlord Jeff always
On 4 February 2010 10:34, Nicholas Clark n...@ccl4.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:17:04AM +, Dan wrote:
Sounds fantastic but why post so late :-( If I had know last week I
would
have left the evening free. Maybe I'll have better luck next time.
The location isn't fixed, but
CV below. Willing to consider support engineering positions if the
company is good. Money isn't the number one priority.
=
Egor Shipovalov
Tel.: +44 07780 211 416, +7 985 233 1841
E-mail: kogdaugo...@gmail.com
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/EgorShipovalov
Homepage:
Under the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act it's unlawful for an employer to
discriminate against you because you are married. This means that they
cannot ask you about this during interviews, etc.
Your voluntary disclosure of this information makes me slightly
uncomfortable but I doubt there is a law
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 13:31 +, Bob MacCallum wrote:
Under the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act it's unlawful for an employer to
discriminate against you because you are married. This means that they
cannot ask you about this during interviews, etc.
That may well be so but the fact remains that
On 4 February 2010 14:48, Raphael Mankin r...@mankin.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 13:31 +, Bob MacCallum wrote:
Under the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act it's unlawful for an employer to
discriminate against you because you are married. This means that they
cannot ask you about this
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:34:04AM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:17:04AM +, Dan wrote:
2010/2/2 Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker ilm...@ilmari.org
Sounds fantastic but why post so late :-( If I had know last week I would
have left the evening free. Maybe I'll have
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:48 +, Philip Potter wrote:
On 4 February 2010 14:48, Raphael Mankin r...@mankin.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 13:31 +, Bob MacCallum wrote:
Under the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act it's unlawful for an employer to
discriminate against you because you are
Since you are in London now - maybe you could come to todays social?
I don't have much experience here - but I would imagine that it should
be good for networking.
Cheers,
Zbigniew
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Egor Shipovalov kogdaugo...@gmail.com wrote:
CV below. Willing to consider
On 4 February 2010 16:29, Raphael Mankin r...@mankin.org.uk wrote:
It's 9 months of full salary more expensive to hire a woman who gets
pregnant, takes her full maternity leave and then decides not to return
to work. Adding on to this advertising, time to review CVs, time to
interview and so
On 4 February 2010 16:50, Dominic Thoreau domi...@thoreau-online.net wrote:
On 4 February 2010 16:29, Raphael Mankin r...@mankin.org.uk wrote:
It's 9 months of full salary more expensive to hire a woman who gets
pregnant, takes her full maternity leave and then decides not to return
to work.
On 4 February 2010 16:29, Raphael Mankin r...@mankin.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:48 +, Philip Potter wrote:
On 4 February 2010 14:48, Raphael Mankin r...@mankin.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 13:31 +, Bob MacCallum wrote:
Under the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act it's
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 16:29 +, Raphael Mankin wrote:
It's 9 months of full salary more expensive to hire a woman who gets
pregnant, takes her full maternity leave and then decides not to return
to work.
The government is in the process of making it possible for the maternity
and paternity
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Dominic Thoreau
domi...@thoreau-online.net wrote:
These days aren't parental leave rights extended to a fairly generous
degree towards the father as well?
IIRC if the mother wants to return to work the father can take
parental leave with very similar conditions
On 4 February 2010 16:50, Dominic Thoreau domi...@thoreau-online.net wrote:
These days aren't parental leave rights extended to a fairly generous
degree towards the father as well?
(looks it up)
Ah, right, the govt. *promised* to change it to six months, but never
actually did anything. About
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 17:02 +, Philip Potter wrote:
Statutory paternity leave is up to 2 weeks. There may be more
generous employers but the law does not require it.
Right now yes, but looking forward, wrong:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2010/jan/28/fathers-six-months-paternity-leave
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 05:02:05PM +, Philip Potter wrote:
On 4 February 2010 16:50, Dominic Thoreau domi...@thoreau-online.net wrote:
On 4 February 2010 16:29, Raphael Mankin r...@mankin.org.uk wrote:
It's 9 months of full salary more expensive to hire a woman who gets
pregnant,
Dear mongers,
I come to you in the hope of enlightenment
At the place were I work we a have a perl software suite that depends on
roughly 148 modules not counting of course on the dependencies that
these 148 modules have.
Ignoring the fact that we currently have a perl binary which has
On 4 Feb 2010, at 18:04, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Paulo Edgar Castro wrote:
It's very likely that I might be missing some obvious knowledge/tricks here.
Would there be a cleverer way to accomplish this ?
Use your OS's package management system.
Which is pretty much guaranteed to not have the
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 05:46:46PM +, Paulo Edgar Castro wrote:
Our initial thought was to just run through the motions of the app
Makefile which has defined these 148 modules with perl Makefile.PL
--defaultdeps make
and wait for the modules to install.
Then the penny droped and we
Hi,
On 04/02/10 17:46, Paulo Edgar Castro wrote:
Long story short as I think I'm making a bit of a mess with the question...
We want to install all the 148 modules with the exact version number of
what we currently have installed. Preferably we want to install
everything exactly as we have.
Look at shipwrite (on CPAN) also run your own CPAN mirror (see
CPAN::Mini) and don't forget version control of everything
Oh local::lib is also useful
On 4 Feb 2010, at 17:46, Paulo Edgar Castro
pauloedgarcas...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mongers,
I come to you in the hope of
Ash Berlin wrote:
Use your OS's package management system.
Which is pretty much guaranteed to not have the exact versions they currently
have installed if they've been using `cpan` et al. to install it .
I don't mean get them from the OS distributor. I mean build RPMs (or
debs or
On 02/04/2010 04:21 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
There is a social on the first Thursday of every month, and an extra
Heretical social on Thursday the 8th.
Don't listen to him. The official meeting date algorithm is defined on
the web site - http://london.pm.org/meetings/
Dave...
On 4 February 2010 18:14, Raphael Mankin r...@mankin.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 16:58 +, Philip Potter wrote:
What I want to see is some real data
showing what the difference in cost is to hire a woman of childbearing
age who may or may not have any plans for getting pregnant,
On 4 February 2010 16:58, Philip Potter philip.g.pot...@gmail.com wrote:
get pregnant. I don't know. What I want to see is some real data
showing what the difference in cost is to hire a woman of childbearing
age who may or may not have any plans for getting pregnant, compared
to hiring a
29 matches
Mail list logo
