Ah, thanks. Yes, does not match my bookmarked manual :(
-Mallory
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:38:34PM +0100, David Leadbeater wrote:
On 27 July 2011 13:56, Mallory van Achterberg stommep...@stommepoes.nlwrote:
Any hints on where in the mutt docs this magic key is?
It's in the manual
Any hints on where in the mutt docs this magic key is?
-Mallory
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:22:19AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
On 07/24/2011 10:36 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:14:24PM +0200, Mallory van Achterberg wrote:
From what I can see, I'd have to set edit_headers
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Mallory van Achterberg wrote:
Any hints on where in the mutt docs this magic key is?
break-thread
R
On 27 July 2011 13:56, Mallory van Achterberg stommep...@stommepoes.nlwrote:
Any hints on where in the mutt docs this magic key is?
It's in the manual for the development version:
http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html#break-threads
Mutt appears to be another of those projects that has
On Jul 25, 2011 6:31 AM, Dave Cross d...@dave.org.uk wrote:
On 07/24/2011 11:00 PM, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Gmail DTRT IMO by treating a subject line change as a new thread.
But that's not the right thing. For example, this discussion has changed
subject but it's still all the same thread and
On 25 Jul 2011, at 06:23, Dave Cross wrote:
But that's not the right thing. For example, this discussion has changed
subject but it's still all the same thread and should be displayed as such.
...which would be exactly the reason that References: headers were added rather
than letting
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:00:13PM +0100, James Laver wrote:
[...]
/j (who really thinks it's about time apple and RIM learned to write
decent mail software for mobile devices)
It's quite shameful for RIM, given their devices are basically designed as
email terminals with a few other features
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:55, Peter Corlett ab...@cabal.org.uk wrote:
The iOS mail client is best described as adequate. It's arguably better
than Outlook, which seems to be the standard MUA these days.
Looking through my address book I'd say Gmail is the standard MUA these days.
Paul
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:11:00AM +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:55, Peter Corlett ab...@cabal.org.uk wrote:
The iOS mail client is best described as adequate. It's arguably better
than Outlook, which seems to be the standard MUA these days.
Looking through my address
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:55:18AM +0100, Peter Corlett wrote:
It's arguably better
than Outlook, which seems to be the standard MUA these days.
About the only thing which isn't better than Outlook is Outlook Express.
From: Andrew Suffield asuffi...@suffields.me.uk
To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers london.pm@london.pm.org
Sent: Monday, 25 July, 2011 6:30:34 PM
Subject: Re: mutt
About the only thing which isn't better than Outlook is Outlook
Express.
I'll see your OE and raise you The Bat!. Last time I
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:30:34PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:55:18AM +0100, Peter Corlett wrote:
It's arguably better than Outlook, which seems to be the standard MUA
these days.
About the only thing which isn't better than Outlook is Outlook Express.
There
Peter Corlett mailto:ab...@cabal.org.uk
July 25, 2011 5:55 AM
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:00:13PM +0100, James Laver wrote:
[...]
It's quite shameful for RIM, given their devices are basically designed as
email terminals with a few other features added on as an afterthought.
The iOS
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Michael Stevens mstev...@etla.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:30:34PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:55:18AM +0100, Peter Corlett wrote:
It's arguably better
than Outlook, which seems to be the standard MUA these days.
About
What, I'm looking around in the docs and I don't see anything
about * except that something's tagged (which I get when people
use Outlook to reply to me it seems??).
From what I can see, I'd have to set edit_headers to true in my
mutt rc to change headers, to start new threads.
So what
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:23:08PM +0200, Joel Bernstein wrote:
On 24 July 2011 23:14, Mallory van Achterberg stommep...@stommepoes.nl
wrote:
So what is this # key for mutt?
Breaks the thread and creates a new one from the message. A
client-side fix for incorrect References: headers
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:36:08PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
Why change headers at all? Just don't hit reply to start a new message
that isn't a reply.
But copying email addresses is _hard_.
So I'm told, by people who are stuck with hateful mail clients. I.e. the
ones who would benefit from
On 24 Jul 2011, at 22:51, Roger Burton West wrote:
But copying email addresses is _hard_.
So I'm told, by people who are stuck with hateful mail clients. I.e. the
ones who would benefit from a better interface for new threads are just
the ones who won't get it.
It's mostly mobile phones
Sent from Android
On Jul 24, 2011 10:46 PM, Nicholas Clark n...@ccl4.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:23:08PM +0200, Joel Bernstein wrote:
On 24 July 2011 23:14, Mallory van Achterberg stommep...@stommepoes.nl
wrote:
So what is this # key for mutt?
Breaks the thread and creates
On 07/24/2011 10:36 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:14:24PM +0200, Mallory van Achterberg wrote:
From what I can see, I'd have to set edit_headers to true in my
mutt rc to change headers, to start new threads.
Why change headers at all? Just don't hit reply to start
On 07/24/2011 11:00 PM, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Gmail DTRT IMO by treating a subject line change as a new thread.
But that's not the right thing. For example, this discussion has changed
subject but it's still all the same thread and should be displayed as such.
Dave...
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:38:03AM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
You're either going to update the atime, or you have to update the
ctime to reset the atime, or you have to read the raw disk somehow.
Or use something other than mutt to tell you which mailboxes have new
messages in them
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:51:44AM +, Roger Burton West said:
Or use something other than mutt to tell you which mailboxes have new
messages in them. xbuffy/gbuffy, if you're using an X desktop, for
example.
I'm, err, not.
Unless I decide to run an X connection over ssh aswell. Which I
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:51:44AM +, Roger Burton West wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:38:03AM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
You're either going to update the atime, or you have to update the
ctime to reset the atime, or you have to read the raw disk somehow.
On a system where I am
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:29:25AM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
Unless I decide to run an X connection over ssh aswell. Which I don't
want to.
You can run x over ssh? Kewl! How?
--
Natalie Ford .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Natalie Ford wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:29:25AM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
Unless I decide to run an X connection over ssh aswell. Which I don't
want to.
You can run x over ssh? Kewl! How?
Just make sure your ssh server and client both have it enabled
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:29:25AM +, Simon Wistow wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:51:44AM +, Roger Burton West said:
Or use something other than mutt to tell you which mailboxes have new
messages in them. xbuffy/gbuffy, if you're using an X desktop, for
example.
I'm, err
the == the hatter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the Just make sure your ssh server and client both have it enabled
the (ForwardX11 yes and X11Forwarding yes) and then run programs as normal
the on the remote server. Then up they pop, encrypted in transit, on your
the local display.
And
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:30:38PM +, the hatter wrote:
Just make sure your ssh server and client both have it enabled
(ForwardX11 yes and X11Forwarding yes) and then run programs as normal
on the remote server. Then up they pop, encrypted in transit, on your
local display. No need to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Natalie Ford wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:30:38PM +, the hatter wrote:
Just make sure your ssh server and client both have it enabled
(ForwardX11 yes and X11Forwarding yes) and then run programs as normal
on the remote server. Then up they pop, encrypted in
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 17:05, Chris Devers wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Natalie Ford wrote:
So, I need to be running X on my client end? I run ssh from windoze...
Last time I checked, there weren't any good freeware ports of Win32/X, but
maybe someone has managed to compile Xfree86 under
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Natalie Ford wrote:
So, I need to be running X on my client end? I run ssh from windoze...
No you need to be running an XServer on your server end[1].
There are many X servers that work with Windows, and many ssh clients that
will do the forwarding to these clients.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Chris Devers wrote:
but it's super easy to set up and the main performance constraint seems to
be plain old bandwidth, as opposed to whatever ram disc space you'd need
to get X going reasonably well on top of Windows...
The real killer is latency. I've had problems
33 matches
Mail list logo
