Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)

2020-05-11 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Eric, On 5/11/20, 3:50 PM, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" wrote: Peter, I will have a look for Alvaro's reply to Barry's comment then :) https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/EcufJn28CFrGkfQ2k6LUOYBcZXc/ Thanks, Acee The suggested text below will fix the nit indeed. Thank

Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)

2020-05-11 Thread Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Peter, I will have a look for Alvaro's reply to Barry's comment then :) The suggested text below will fix the nit indeed. Thank you -éric -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak Date: Monday, 11 May 2020 at 19:14 To: Eric Vyncke , The IESG Cc: "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-...@ietf.org" ,

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

2020-05-11 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Elwyn, On 5/11/20, 2:10 PM, "Elwyn Davies" wrote: Hi, Peter. In the light of some of your responses here, I would just like to clarify that one of the reasons for gen-art reviews is to try and make extremely complicated technical documents more accessible for those who

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

2020-05-11 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Elwyn, please see inline (##PP) On 11/05/2020 19:37, Elwyn Davies wrote: Hi, Peter. In the light of some of your responses here, I would just like to clarify that one of the reasons for gen-art reviews is to try and make extremely complicated technical documents more accessible for those

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

2020-05-11 Thread Elwyn Davies
Hi, Peter. In the light of some of your responses here, I would just like to clarify that one of the reasons for gen-art reviews is to try and make extremely complicated technical documents more accessible for those who are not as deeply embedded in the jargon and technicalities of the

Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

2020-05-11 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Eric, please see inline: On 11/05/2020 17:55, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote: Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and

Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)

2020-05-11 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Eric, please see inline: On 11/05/2020 18:02, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote: Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and

Re: [Lsr] Questions about draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-04

2020-05-11 Thread tony . li
Hi Xuesong, > Thank you for giving detailed proof, and it is very helpful to understand the > mechanism. > As I understand, it is showed in the proof that if there is proper temporary > flooding in R = E - E* - E’, same connectivity could be achieved by the > flooding topology F’ just as G’.

[Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)

2020-05-11 Thread Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

[Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

2020-05-11 Thread Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [Lsr] Questions about draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-04

2020-05-11 Thread Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
Hi Tony, Thank you for giving detailed proof, and it is very helpful to understand the mechanism. As I understand, it is showed in the proof that if there is proper temporary flooding in R = E - E* - E’, same connectivity could be achieved by the flooding topology F’ just as G’. I agree with