Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-01

Hi Gyan, Thanks for your support and comments on the draft. The proposed encoding for L2 Bundle members and their attributes in OSPF is different than the ISIS encodings in RFC8668. ISIS encodings have “tighter” LSP space considerations that OSPF. The authors have proposed a simpler encoding s

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-01

I support the adoption of this document by the WG and as an author, I am not aware of any IPR associated with it. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: 02 October 2020 17:33 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bund

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

Thanks Peter! On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 5:51 AM Peter Psenak wrote: > Hi Gyan, > > > > On 03/10/2020 18:54, Gyan Mishra wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Peter for the responses to help clear up my flex algo > understanding!! > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 5:45 AM Peter Psenak > >

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

Yingzhen, On 03/10/2020 20:08, Yingzhen Qu wrote: Hi Peter, Using flex-algo, a SRv6 locator can be associated with a single algo, which means an IPv6 or IPv4 address can also be associated with a single algo. So my understanding is Ron's proposal is making the configuration of flex-algo easier?

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-00.txt

Hi Gyan, On 03/10/2020 18:54, Gyan Mishra wrote: Thanks Peter for the responses to help clear up my flex algo understanding!! On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 5:45 AM Peter Psenak > wrote: Gyan, On 03/10/2020 02:14, Gyan Mishra wrote: > > Hi  Jeff