Linda –
Picking up on this comment from Acee:
“Note that routes are based on IP prefixes and not applications while the draft
uses these two interchangeably. “
As regards how to advertise the new metric, to the best of my understanding
what you want to advertise is the cost to reach an anycast
Hi Linda,
From: Linda Dunbar
Date: Monday, July 12, 2021 at 5:41 PM
To: Acee Lindem , Yingzhen Qu ,
"lsr@ietf.org"
Cc: "lsr-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: IP layer metrics collected by Edge routers -
draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute-ospf-ext (was: LSR Presentation Slot request)
Acee,
The draft-d
"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" writes:
Chris –
As regards a meeting specifically targeted for the flooding speed
topic, here is my personal request/requirement:
The meeting MUST allow at least 50 % of the allocated meeting time
for open discussion.
Oh it MUST, MUST it?
Of course it would inclu
Acee,
The draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute-ospf-ext has two parts:
* Aggregated Cost Advertisement
* IP Layer App-Metrics Advertisements by OSPF
"Aggregated Cost" is only applicable to scenario where all the A-ER can have a
consistent algorithm to compute the Aggregated cost.
When it i
Speaking as WG member:
Hi Linda,
Even if you’ve added some IS-IS encodings, the draft still suffers from the
fundamental problem of the previous draft. If you can’t rely on the A-ERs to
consistently calculate an aggregated metric, how can you rely on all the
routers in the IGP routing domain to
Chris –
As regards a meeting specifically targeted for the flooding speed topic, here
is my personal request/requirement:
The meeting MUST allow at least 50 % of the allocated meeting time for open
discussion.
If all we do at the interim meeting is fill the time with presentations, we
will not
Yingzhen and LSR Chairs,
We need a 10 minutes slot at IETF111 to present
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute/
Speaker: Linda Dunbar.
This draft adds the IS-IS extension to the
draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute-ospf-ext-04.
Thank you
Linda Dunbar
From: Lsr On Beh
LSR WG,
We added IS-IS extension to draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute-ospf-ext-04,
therefore changed the draft name to draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute-ext-00.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute/
We would like to get feedback on our proposed IS-IS extension:
The Ap
> On Jul 9, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> wrote:
>
> I agree with Bruno that the time available in the WG meeting will likely be
> inadequate to present full updates for both drafts. In addition, I think it
> is important that the WG have
> an opportunity to discuss publicly i
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and
Constraints
Authors : Shraddha Hegde
Les,
Faster flooding may be achieved without protocol extension. But if we are at
changing flooding, it would be reasonable to try to make it good (rather than
just faster than today).
In particular some goals are:
- faster flooding when the receiver has free cycles
- slower flooding when the re
speaking of which, can I have 5 mins on the agenda for update flood
reflection draft v2/v3? earlier in the session would be merciful since it's
1am-3am session on Fri for me. thx. tony
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 7:26 AM Tony Przygienda wrote:
> Dear chairs, flood reflection is implemented/shipped an
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing
based Virtual Transport Network
Authors : Chongfeng X
13 matches
Mail list logo
