LGTM
Les (Probably slightly slower than Tony’s response )
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 4:26 PM
To: lsr
Subject: [Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for
draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-01.txt
Per Les’ requeest.
Elapsed time: 3 mins.
T
Begin forwarded
Per Les’ requeest.
Elapsed time: 3 mins.
T
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-01.txt
> Date: April 23, 2024 at 4:24:44 PM PDT
> To: "Tony Li"
>
> A new version of Internet-Draft
I support the proposed change as modified by Chris's comment that the target
should be to use Expert Review.
In this way all IS-IS codepoint registries would be handled in a consistent
manner and all would allow any class of RFC - including Experimental - to
obtain a code point when
