Hi Acee, Jia,
Yes, version -06 had the changes to align with the TEAS terminology.
Best regards
Chongfeng
chongfeng@foxmail.com
From: Acee Lindem
Date: 2024-01-24 03:16
To: Hejia (Jia)
CC: Chongfeng Xie; Routing Directorate; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt.all;
last-call; lsr
Subject
Hi Acee, Jia,
Yes, version -06 had the changes to align with the TEAS terminology.
Best regards
Chongfeng
chongfeng@foxmail.com
From: Acee Lindem
Date: 2024-01-24 03:16
To: Hejia (Jia)
CC: Chongfeng Xie; Routing Directorate; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt.all;
last-call; lsr
Subject
Partition (NRP)
Authors: Chongfeng Xie
Chenhao Ma
Jie Dong
Zhenbin Li
Name:draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-07.txt
Pages: 9
Dates: 2024-01-23
Abstract:
Enhanced VPNs aim to deliver VPN services with enhanced
characteristics
Hi Xuesong,
Thanks for your support and review comments. We are working on a new revision
which will take your comments into consideration.
As for your suggestion to add reference to the more scalable solution,
according to the comments from Acee, we would not mention the specific solution
Hi Acee,
Many thanks for your review and suggestions. I agree with them and will update
the draft accordingly.
Please see some further replies inline [Chongfeng]:
From: spring On Behalf Of Acee Lindem
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2024 2:42 AM
To: Lsr ; t...@ietf.org; spr...@ietf.org
To: Chongfeng Xie; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); jmh; Acee Lindem; TEAS WG; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Teas] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of
IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition
(NRP)" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06
From
Hi Les,
Thanks for your comments.
This is an informational document which describes the applicability of existing
IS-IS MT mechanisms for building SR based NRPs. All the normative references
are either RFCs or stable WG documents. It is true that some informative
references are individual
Hi Joel,
Thanks for your comments. It is good to know you also think using MT to support
NRP is a good idea.
Regarding the timing of the last call, the enhanced VPN framework draft has
finished the WG LC in TEAS WG, and this document has been stable for quite a
while, thus it seems now is
Hi folks,
As a co-author, Hi folks, I am unaware of any IPR to this draft.
Best regards
Chongfeng
From: Acee Lindem
Date: 2024-01-09 06:43
To: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt
CC: Lsr
Subject: [Lsr] IPR Poll for WG Last Call of "Applicability of IS-IS
Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment
are fixed.
With this, we believe all the comments received on this document have resolved,
and this version is ready for WG LC.
Best regards
Chongfeng Xie
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Date: 2023-12-29 19:15
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
CC: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr
Hi Jia,
Thanks for the review comments.
I see your major comment is about the terminology alignment, as replied to
Daniele, we will follow the decision in TEAS to update the terminologies in
next revision.
Please see some replies to the minor issues inline:
From: He Jia via Datatracker
Hi Daniele,
Thank you for your suggestion, we will add some text to explain the comment in
the next version.
Best regards
Chongfeng
From: Daniele Ceccarelli
Date: 2023-12-01 23:42
To: Chongfeng Xie
CC: rtg-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt.all; last-call; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir
Hi Daniele,
Thanks a lot for your careful review and comments. Please see my replies inline
[Chongfeng]:
-Original Message-
From: Daniele Ceccarelli via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 10:21 PM
To: rtg-...@ietf.org
Cc:
Hi， all
I have read the draf and support its adoption.
Chongfeng
> 2022年1月4日 下午2:58，Christian Hopps 写道：
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/
>
> Please indicate your
Hi，all，
I support the adoption of these 2 drafts.
Chongfeng
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 6:48 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org
>
-aware SIDs, it can further provide VTNs with
guaranteed resources. We could add some text about this to the draft if you
think this is helpful.
Best regards
Chongfeng
发件人： Acee Lindem \(acee\)
发送时间： 2021-03-30 03:32
收件人： Chongfeng Xie; Dongjie (Jimmy); Acee Lindem (acee); lsr@ietf.org
主题： Re: [Lsr
-27 18:31
收件人： Chongfeng Xie; Dongjie (Jimmy); Acee Lindem (acee); lsr@ietf.org
主题： Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment
Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
Speaking as WG member:
Hi Chongfeng,
Another thing, if one
references
to relevant TEAS documents in next revision.
Chongfeng
发件人： Acee Lindem (acee)
发送时间： 2021-03-26 23:30
收件人： Dongjie (Jimmy); Chongfeng Xie; Acee Lindem (acee); lsr@ietf.org
主题： Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment
Routing based Virtual Transport Network
Hi，Acee，
Regarding to the issues put forward in your mail, I'd like to provide some
comments as below,
Q1：I’d like to know of the WG members who supported it, would you really want
to market it as a VTN solution?
[CF]：VTN is defined in draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn, and also used in other
Hi， Les,
Thanks for the review of this document.
As the current document type is informational, it does not introduce new TLV to
IS-IS. While it describes the mechanisms of using existing TLVs to distribute
the information of SR based VTNs, which can have customized topology and a set
of
Hi, Qin,
Thanks a lot for your support. Please see some replies inline:
Chongfeng
chongfeng@foxmail.com
发件人： Qin Wu
发送时间： 2021-03-03 14:50
收件人： Acee Lindem (acee); lsr@ietf.org
主题： Re: [Lsr]WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment
Routing based Virtual
Hi, folks,
I'm not aware of any IPR associated with this document.
Thanks!
Chongfeng Xie
From: Acee Lindem \(acee\)
Date: 2021-03-03 07:35
To: draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vrn...@ietf.org
CC: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment
Routing
22 matches
Mail list logo
