Hi Jeff,
Thanks very much for your review and detailed comments.
All are reasonable to me.
We will work through the document and address your comments.
Thanks,
Tianran
From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:jh...@pfrc.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 4:37 AM
To: Tianran Zhou
Cc: Robert Raszuk
12:10 AM
To: Tianran Zhou
Cc: Robert Raszuk ; Yingzhen Qu ;
idr ; grow ; lsr
Subject: Re: [Idr] [GROW] [Lsr] IGP Monitoring Protocol
Tianran,
Please note that nothing prohibits BGP-LS from being distributed over BMP today
aside from implementation support. It's just another AFI/SAFI
ct data is
best way to share/export it.
Many thx,
R.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 5:34 PM Tianran Zhou
mailto:zhoutian...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Since our work is just follow the BMP which is in GROW in OPS area, we
presented this in OPSAWG and GROW.
We want to reuse BMP for IGP w
st,
R.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 4:54 PM Tianran Zhou
mailto:zhoutian...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Robert,
This is very interesting to me. We had a protocol design for IGP monitoring:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gu-opsawg-network-monitoring-igp-01
It would be a good idea
g a separate transport. IMP authors have
chosen to reuse selected BMP building blocks and BMP operational and
deployment experience.
Many thx,
R.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 4:02 PM Tianran Zhou
mailto:zhoutian...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Robert,
I see this name very similar to BMP bg
Hi Robert,
I see this name very similar to BMP bgp monitoring protocol.
Is this the similar function and scope as BMP?
Best,
Tianran
Sent from WeLink
发件人： Robert Raszukmailto:rob...@raszuk.net>>
收件人： Yingzhen Qumailto:yingzhen.i...@gmail.com>>
抄送：
Hi Chairs and the WG,
I support the adoption of this document.
Cheers,
Tianran
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:17 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" -
Hi Thomas,
I think questions from both Ketan and Gyan on the IE usage are very important.
The value should be described clearly in the draft. So that people now how to
implement and use them.
Here your replay to Ketan on the mplsTopLabelType is clear to me. You want to
account the traffic with
ments, and try to
> achieve consensus.
>
> Thanks,
> Yali
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>
> internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>
> [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> S
org]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 7:54 PM
To: Tianran Zhou
Cc: Christian Hopps ; Henk Smit ;
lsr@ietf.org; Huaimo Chen
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ
My comments about what the WG should be doing are "As WGChair", I'm not
commenting directly on TTZ, but on the broade
PM
To: Tianran Zhou
Cc: Huaimo Chen ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ
Hello Tianran,
Warning, long email again.
> What's the criterion to evaluate the benefit?
As people have asked before, did any provider or enterprise ever use rfc8099 in
their network ?
As I wr
Hi Henk,
"Adding a new concept, with very little benefit, hurts the protocol in the long
run. The ability to abstract an area, and not also a zone, is strong enough to
be worthwhile, imho."
Your conclusion here seems very subjective.
What's the criterion the evaluate the benefit? What I see
: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 4:31 PM
To: Tianran Zhou ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt
Tianran,
On 02/06/2020 10:25, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Peter,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Psenak
Peter,
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 4:10 PM
To: Tianran Zhou ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt
Tianran,
On 02/06/2020 08:14, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
;
Tianran
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 6:56 PM
To: Tianran Zhou ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt
Tianran,
On 01/06/2020 12:49, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Hi Authors,
>
> I
Hi Authors,
I see the following words in the introduction.
" Recently, mechanisms have been defined to signal labels via link-
state Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP) such as IS-IS [RFC8667]. "
It's not clear to me what the " mechanisms " are. Could you please add some
reference or text on
...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 7:04 PM
To: Tianran Zhou ; Jeff Tantsura
; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; Tony Li
Cc: Greg Mirsky ; ops...@ietf.org;
draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framew...@ietf.org;
draft-wang-lsr-ifit-node-capability-advertisem...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I
: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 4:29 AM
To: Tianran Zhou ; Jeff Tantsura
; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; Tony Li
Cc: Greg Mirsky ;
draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framew...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; ops...@ietf.org;
draft-wang-lsr-ifit-node-capability-advertisem...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I,Scope of FIT Capability
tatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-sr-policy-ifit/
Best Wishes,
Tianran
From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 4:25 AM
To: Tianran Zhou ; Jeff Tantsura
; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; Tony Li
Cc: Greg Mirsky ;
draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framew...@ietf.org;
Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2020年4月7日 2:54
收件人: Jeff Tantsura ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; Tony Li
抄送: Greg Mirsky ;
draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framew...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; ops...@ietf.org;
Tianran Zhou ;
draft-wang-lsr-ifit-node-capability-advertisem...@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Lsr] I
Hi Greg,
Thanks very much for your interest on both IFIT framework and IFIT capability
draft. And thanks for your review comments.
Your perspective on both drafts are correct.
On the node or link capability, thanks for your suggestion.
I agree with both you and Jeff. The link capability can make
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your replay. Please see in line.
Cheers,
Tianran
发件人: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2020年4月4日 6:13
收件人: Tianran Zhou
抄送: wangyali ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; Les
Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Christian Hopps ;
lsr@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Lsr] 答复: A new version of I-D
of the telemetry information.
Tianran
-Original Message-
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 8:47 PM
To: Christian Hopps ; Robert Raszuk
Cc: wangyali ; Acee Lindem (acee) ;
lsr@ietf.org; Tianran Zhou
Subject: RE: [Lsr] A new version of I
Hi Greg,
Good questions. Please see my reply in line.
Thanks,
Tianran
From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 6:58 AM
To: wangyali
Cc: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; Christian Hopps ; lsr@ietf.org;
Tianran Zhou
Subject: Re: [Lsr] 答复
Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; Christian Hopps
; Acee Lindem (acee) ; Tianran Zhou
; wangyali
Subject: Re: [Lsr] A new version of I-D,
draft-liu-lsr-isis-ifit-node-capability-02
Jeff.
> The role of a routing protocol is to distribute: reachability (doh :-))
> and any additional data that
Hi Les,
Thanks very much for your suggestion. I have a quick look at rfc6823. Sounds
like a good idea. I will think about it.
Cheers,
Tianran
-Original Message-
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 1:47 PM
To: Tianran Zhou
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your quick reply, and please see inline.
Cheers,
Tianran
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps [mailto:cho...@chopps.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 10:00 AM
To: Tianran Zhou
Cc: Christian Hopps ; wangyali ; Les
Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject
Hi Chris,
Please see in line.
Thanks,
Tianran
-Original Message-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 7:00 PM
To: wangyali
Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Christian Hopps
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] A new version of
28 matches
Mail list logo
