[Lsr] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags

2024-06-29 Thread linchangwang
Hi WG, I support publication. Comments on the YANG: 1. The admin-tag for the aggregation of basic topology is defined, but the admin-tag for the aggregation under multiple topologies is not defined. 2. The local-rib under RFC9129 has an old route-tag definition, it is recommended to als

[Lsr] Re: WG Adotpion call - draft-li-lsr-labv-registration (5/2/2024-5/16/2024)

2024-05-06 Thread linchangwang
Hi WG, I support adoption. It is necessary to promptly adjust the registration procedure for the "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values" registry from "Standards Action" to "Expert Review" to align with other IS-IS TLV definitions. Thanks, Changwang 发件人: Lsr 代表 Yingzhen Qu 发送时间: 202

[Lsr] 回复: IPR Poll for WG Adoption for "Updates to Anycast Property advertisement for OSPFv2" - draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-06

2024-03-20 Thread linchangwang
Hi Acee & WG, I am not aware of any IPR related to this document. Best Regards, Changwang -邮件原件- 发件人: Acee Lindem 发送时间: 2024年3月20日 2:34 收件人: draft-chen-lsr-anycast-f...@ietf.org 抄送: lsr 主题: IPR Poll for WG Adoption for "Updates to Anycast Property advertisement for OSPFv2" - draft-ch

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link

2024-03-11 Thread linchangwang
Hi Yingzhen & WG, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document. Best Regards, Changwang 发件人: Lsr 代表 Yingzhen Qu 发送时间: 2024年3月9日 8:58 收件人: draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-l...@ietf.org; lsr ; lsr-chairs 主题: [Lsr] IPR Poll for draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link Hi all, Th

[Lsr] 回复: Fw:New Version Notification for draft-gong-lsr-lldp-interface-id-00.txt

2024-02-29 Thread linchangwang
Hi Sandy, Thank you for the review and comments. That really helps. Please see inline [Changwang] Thanks, Changwang 发件人: Lsr 代表 zhang.zh...@zte.com.cn 发送时间: 2024年3月1日 11:05 收件人: gongli...@chinamobile.com 抄送: lsr@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Lsr] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-gong-lsr-lldp-interfa

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link (02/23/24 - 03/08/24)

2024-02-25 Thread linchangwang
Hi, I support adoption. As a co-author, I’m unaware of any IPR on the document. Thanks, Changwang 发件人: Lsr 代表 Yingzhen Qu 发送时间: 2024年2月23日 13:28 收件人: lsr ; lsr-chairs 主题: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link (02/23/24 - 03/08/24) Hi, This email begins a 2 we

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition (NRP)" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06

2024-01-12 Thread linchangwang
Hi Acee,, I have reviewed the document. It leverages the IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) to build SR-based VTNs, which is a good idea for network scenarios. I also believe it is practical for NRP deployment. The current document is mature enough, so I support its WGLC. Thanks, Changwang -Origin

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03 (Corrected End Date)

2023-11-21 Thread linchangwang
Hi Acee and WG, I support the adoption of this draft as it provides a solution to effectively address the problem of insufficient existing flags for OSPFv2/OSPFv3. Additionally, it significantly enhances protocol extension capabilities. I have a question: When the Prefix Attributes Sub-TLV

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04

2023-08-30 Thread linchangwang
Hi WG, When considering adoption, it's important to take into account the following drafts as well. Draft #1 link:https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-12.txt Draft #2 link:https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04.t

[Lsr] Discussion on tracing OSPF purge LSAs

2023-07-25 Thread linchangwang
Hi all, From Notes and recordings: Purge Originator Identification for OSPF 11:15 (originally 10:45, remote presenter could not be reached) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-ospf-purge-originator/ Zhenqiang Li & Changwang lin (10 mins) [Acee Lindem] The medicine/solution is worse than

Re: [Lsr] IETF-116 LSR - IGP extensions for AdvertisingOffsetforFlex-Algorithm

2023-04-18 Thread linchangwang
Szarkowicz; Robert Raszuk; linchangwang (RD); Acee Lindem; 程伟强; Les Ginsberg(ginsbe; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] IETF-116 LSR - IGP extensions for AdvertisingOffsetforFlex-Algorithm Peter Psenak writes: > Liyan, > > On 13/04/2023 06:50, Liyan Gong wrote: >> Hi All, >

Re: [Lsr] IETF-116 LSR - IGP extensions for Advertising Offset forFlex-Algorithm

2023-04-13 Thread linchangwang
s are arranged in the sr policy to achieve SR-TE traffic scheduling So , this draft with offset would reduce the refresh requirement. Regards, Changwang -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 5:09 PM To: Louis Chan; linchan

Re: [Lsr] IETF-116 LSR - IGP extensions for Advertising Offset forFlex-Algorithm

2023-04-12 Thread linchangwang
ntees, corresponding to different resource requirements. Thanks, Changwang lin From: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 10:12 PM To: Peter Psenak Cc: linchangwang (RD); 程伟强; Louis Chan; Les Ginsberg (ginsbe; lsr; Krzysztof Szarkowicz Subject: Re: [Lsr] IETF-116 LSR

Re: [Lsr] IETF-116 LSR - IGP extensions for Advertising Offset forFlex-Algorithm

2023-04-12 Thread linchangwang
Hi Peter, Please see inline [changwang lin]. >Changwang, >please see inline (##PP2): On 12/04/2023 15:13, linchangwang wrote: > Hi Peter > > Please see inline [changwang lin]. > >> We've met the same problem when applying Flex Algo in SRv6 network. >

Re: [Lsr] IETF-116 LSR - IGP extensions for Advertising Offset forFlex-Algorithm

2023-04-12 Thread linchangwang
Hi Peter Please see inline [changwang lin]. > We've met the same problem when applying Flex Algo in SRv6 network. what problem exactly, can you please describe it? [changwang lin] Advertisement size of per Flex-Algo Adj-SID in the network Related to F(# of node, # of FA, # of links) For a node

Re: [Lsr] NewVersionNotificationfordraft-cheng-ospf-adjacency-suppress-00.txt

2023-04-02 Thread linchangwang
e does not introduce remote traffic over a period of time. Thanks, Changwang -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 8:08 PM To: Liyan Gong Cc: Les Ginsberg; Tony Przygienda; chenmengxiao (RD); lsr; Weiqiang Cheng; l

Re: [Lsr] Question on "Advertisement of Dedicated Metric for Flexible Algorithm in IGP"

2022-03-23 Thread linchangwang
Hi Acee Very much appreciated- especially in the middle of the busy IETF week. Thanks for your guidance with the text. We will post an update to the draft after the IETF week. Best Regards Changwang Lin From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday