ions for the IGPs. It does not change anything in
> the RFCs referred to above. Hence there is no "updates" consideration here.
>
>
>
> Gyan>This is a confusing point and maybe something the authors can
> clarify in the text. So this draft defines a new Adj
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 9:37 AM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy)
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Christian Hopps
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Advertisement"
Hi Jimmy
Please see my commen
nt: 10 June 2021 18:54
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>
Cc: cho...@chopps.org<mailto:cho...@chopps.org>;
lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>;
peng.sha...@zte.com.cn<mailto:peng.sha...@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algor
y, June 10, 2021 1:05 PM
> *To:* Christian Hopps
> *Cc:* lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related
> IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"
>
>
>
>
>
> I support WG adoption of this draft.
>
>
>
> This draft fills the gap w
Gyan Mishra
> *Sent:* 10 June 2021 18:54
> *To:* Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> *Cc:* cho...@chopps.org; lsr@ietf.org; peng.sha...@zte.com.cn
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related
> IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi K
-on element
on top of the LSR Flex-Algo solution.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: Gyan Mishra
Sent: 10 June 2021 18:54
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Cc: cho...@chopps.org; lsr@ietf.org; peng.sha...@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Advertiseme
The document is adopted. We have enough support, and given the development
email on the adoption call thread clearly people willing to work on the
document.
Authors please resubmit as draft-ietf-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid-00
Thanks,
Acee & Chris.
Christian Hopps writes:
Hi Folk
.
Thanks,
Ketan
From: Gyan Mishra
Sent: 10 June 2021 18:54
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Cc: cho...@chopps.org; lsr@ietf.org; peng.sha...@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Advertisement"
Hi Ketan
See in-line
Thanks
Gyan
On T
sage-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of peng.sha...@zte.com.cn
> Sent: 10 June 2021 11:48
> To: hayabusa...@gmail.com
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related
> IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"
or "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Advertisement"
Hi Gyan,
Thanks for your support.
Please see inline [PSF]
Regards,
PSF
--原始邮件--
发件人:GyanMishra
收件人:Christian Hopps;
抄送人:lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 :2021年06月10日 13:05
主 题 :Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for
Hi Gyan,
Please see some comments inline:
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 1:05 PM
To: Christian Hopps
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Advertisement"
I
[Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
SID Advertisement"
I support adoption of this draft.
I believe that there are use cases for algorithm specific adjacency-sids -
primarily (and non-controversially) to provide algorithm specific repair paths.
Hi Gyan,
Thanks for your support.
Please see inline [PSF]
Regards,
PSF
--原始邮件--
发件人:GyanMishra
收件人:Christian Hopps;
抄送人:lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 :2021年06月10日 13:05
主 题 :Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertis
I support WG adoption of this draft.
This draft fills the gap where multiple algorithm identifiers are
associated with a link applied to prefix sid and to add parity as now this
draft provides Algo association with the adjacency SID as well. At the end
of the introduction is stated that the algor
Hi Les,
Thanks for your comments.
Please see inline [PSF].
Regards,
PSF
--原始邮件--
发件人:LesGinsberg(ginsberg)
收件人:Christian Hopps;lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 :2021年06月02日 13:04
主 题 :Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertiseme
Hi Aijun,
Thanks for your comments.
Please see inline [PSF]
Regards,
PSF
--原始邮件--
发件人:AijunWang
收件人:'Christian Hopps';lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 :2021年06月02日 11:51
主 题 :Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement&
g
> Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
> Advertisement"
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-
>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 4:57 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: cho...@chopps.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi Folks,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-p
lexalgo adj sid
extension
Best regards,
Zhibo
-Original Message-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 4:57 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: cho...@chopps.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Hi Jie,
Please see inline [PSF]
--原始邮件--
发件人:Dongjie(Jimmy)
收件人:彭少富10053815;
抄送人:lsr@ietf.org;cho...@chopps.org;
日 期 :2021年05月31日 17:35
主 题 :Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi PSF,
Please
hread,
> I
> will try to answer it in your previous email.
>
> Regards,
> PSF
>
>
>
>
> --原始邮件--
> 发件人:Dongjie(Jimmy)
> 收件人:彭少富10053815;
> 抄送人:cho...@chopps.org;lsr@ietf.org;
> 日 期 :2021年05月28日 14:24
> 主 题 :RE: Re:[Lsr] L
rg
> Cc: cho...@chopps.org
> Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
> Advertisement"
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-alg
Hi Jie,
See in-line [PSF], for resource reservation topic.
Regards,
PSF
原始邮件
发件人:Dongjie(Jimmy)
收件人:Christian Hopps;lsr@ietf.org;
日 期 :2021年05月28日 11:40
主 题 :Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi,
I don
05月28日 14:24
主 题 :RE: Re:[Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi PSF,
Thanks for your pointer to another document which defines the encodings of
per-Algo TE link attributes.
But my comments are related to the text in section 3 and 5 of thi
0
主 题 :[Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi Folks,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid/
Please indicate your support or objecti
Hi,
I support WG adoption of this draft.
It seems clear to me that protection for any constrained topology should
use/prefer same constrains if available (with possible fallback to base if
operator wishes so).
Flexible algorithm based topologies should be no exception to this.
And as a side not
Message-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 4:57 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: cho...@chopps.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi Folks,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoptio
Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)
-Original Message-
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 4:57 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: cho...@chopps.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement&
interoperability would make this document simpler.
Best regards,
Jie
>
>
>
> thanks,
> Peter
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jie
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hop
..@chopps.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi Folks,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid
/
Please indicate your sup
>
> --原始邮件--
> 发件人:Dongjie(Jimmy)
> 收件人:Christian Hopps;lsr@ietf.org;
> 日 期 :2021年05月28日 11:40
> 主 题 :Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency
> SID Advertisement"
> Hi,
> I don't support the adopt
ay, May 27, 2021 4:57 AM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: cho...@chopps.org
> Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
> Advertisement"
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
>
> https://
1 4:57 AM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: cho...@chopps.org
> Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
> Advertisement"
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
>
> https://datatracke
l for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi Folks,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid/
Please indicate your support or objections by June 9th, 2021
Authors, please
Hello All,
I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document.
Thanks,
Ketan
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: 27 May 2021 02:27
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: cho...@chopps.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacenc
Hi Acee and Chris,
I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.
thanks,
Peter
On 26/05/2021 22:56, Christian Hopps wrote:
Hi Folks,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid/
Hi Folks,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid/
Please indicate your support or objections by June 9th, 2021
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any I
37 matches
Mail list logo