DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN
mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>>; Van De Velde,
Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Proposed Errata for RFCs 8919/8920
Hi,
I think that there may still be some ambiguity arising from the text below due
to
TLVs.
thanks,
Peter
Thanks,
Rudy
*From:*Lsr *On Behalf Of *Shraddha Hegde
*Sent:* Thursday, June 17, 2021 7:14 AM
*To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Van De Velde, Gunter
(Nokia - BE/Antwerp) ; lsr@ietf.org
*Cc:* DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN
*Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Proposed Errata for RFCs 8919/8920
IMT/OLN
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Proposed Errata for RFCs 8919/8920
Les,
> Whether ASLA sub-TLV is present in IS-Neighbor TLV and whether it has
> zero-length ABM on non-zero-length ABM is irrelevant to the use of ASLA SRLG
> TLV - and vice versa.
Can you state this explicitly in the docume
...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Les
Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 8:55 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Cc: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN
mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>>; Van De Velde,
Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>>
Su
40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>>;
lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Cc: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN
mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>>; Van De Velde,
Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Proposed Errata for RFCs 8919/8920
Hi,
I
t;
Cc: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN
mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>>; Van De Velde,
Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>>
Subject: [Lsr] Proposed Errata for RFCs 8919/8920
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Folks -
Recent discussions on
AENE Bruno IMT/OLN ; Van De Velde, Gunter
(Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Proposed Errata for RFCs 8919/8920
Hi,
I think that there may still be some ambiguity arising from the text below due
to the fact that
There are attributes such as maximum-link-bandwidth which have special
beha
mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Les
Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 8:55 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Cc: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN
mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>>; Van De Velde,
Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
mailto:gunter.van_de_ve
21 8:55 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN ; Van De Velde, Gunter
(Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
Subject: [Lsr] Proposed Errata for RFCs 8919/8920
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Folks -
Recent discussions on the list have highlighted some unintentional ambiguity in
how A
Bruno -
Thanx for the prompt review.
I will incorporate your suggested change.
Les
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:33 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org
Cc: Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
Subject: RE: Proposed Errata for RFCs 8919/8920
Les, Peter,
Thank you for agreeing to clarify the sentence and for the effort put in
proposing a new text.
Proposed text looks much better to me. I particularly like the either MUST or
MUST NOT statement.
I have one comment.
In the RFC, the term "advertisement" is used to refer both to
Folks -
Recent discussions on the list have highlighted some unintentional ambiguity in
how ASLA advertisements are to be used. Please see
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/prSLJDkMUnHm6h7VuCdn_Q7-1vg/
The following proposed Errata address this ambiguity and aligns language in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
