[Lsr] Re: draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-08

See on inline. > On Jul 21, 2025, at 4:47 AM, Roman Danyliw wrote: > > Hi Peter! > > Thanks for the revised -08 draft. > > I need help understanding how this revising is responsive to my DISCUSS > feedback about the registry (now) in Section 12.3. > > I see this block of new text: > ==[ s

[Lsr] Re: draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-08

Hi Roman, please see inline (##PP): On 21/07/2025 10:47, Roman Danyliw wrote: Hi Peter! Thanks for the revised -08 draft. I need help understanding how this revising is responsive to my DISCUSS feedback about the registry (now) in Section 12.3. I see this block of new text: ==[ snip ]==

[Lsr] Re: draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-08

Hi Peter! Thanks for the revised -08 draft. I need help understanding how this revising is responsive to my DISCUSS feedback about the registry (now) in Section 12.3. I see this block of new text: ==[ snip ]== When a new constraint is defined, the rule associated with that constraint MA