The WGLC has completed. The documented was updated to address the objections
made during the WGLC. The write-up will begin and publication will be requested.
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Oct 15, 2020, at 2:15 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending
g it to a draft that is
>> (and should be) focused on simple protocol extensions.
>>
>> Thanx.
>>
>> Les
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Aijun Wang
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 6:51 PM
>>> To: 'Jeff
...@ietf.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
Hello authors,
I have a couple of comments.
1.
A received Prefix Originator Sub-TLV that has an invalid length (not
4 or 16) or a Reachable Address containing an invalid IPv4 or IPv6
Hello authors,
I have a couple of comments.
1.
A received Prefix Originator Sub-TLV that has an invalid length (not
4 or 16) or a Reachable Address containing an invalid IPv4 or IPv6
address (dependent on address family of the associated prefix) MUST
be considered invalid and
>>>
>>> Cc: 'Christian Hopps' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; Les
Ginsberg
>>> (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-
>>> lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org
>>> Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-orig
should be) focused on simple protocol extensions.
>>
>> Thanx.
>>
>> Les
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Aijun Wang
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 6:51 PM
>>> To: 'Jeff Tantsura' ; 'John E Drake'
>>&
> Cc: wang...@chinatelecom.cn; Peter Psenak ; Les
> Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Christian Hopps
> ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura
> ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org;
> lsr-
> a...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-o
--Original Message-
>>>> From: Peter Psenak
>>>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 6:32 AM
>>>> To: Aijun Wang ; Peter Psenak
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Aijun Wang
>>>> ; Christian Hopps ;
>>>> John E Drake ;
re adding the prefix originator extension to
> >> OSPF is NOT the broken use case in the appendix of the draft.
> >>>> thanks,
> >>>> Peter
> >>>>> You can then write a separate draft to discuss other use cases and
> >>>>> a
k
>>
>> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Aijun Wang
>> ; Christian Hopps ; John E
>> Drake ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura
>> ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org;
>> lsr-
>> a...@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG L
k
>>
>> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Aijun Wang
>> ; Christian Hopps ; John E
>> Drake ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura
>> ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org;
>> lsr-
>> a...@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG L
k
>>
>> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Aijun Wang
>> ; Christian Hopps ; John E
>> Drake ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura
>> ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org;
>> lsr-
>> a...@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG L
un Wang ; Peter Psenak
>
> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Aijun Wang
> ; Christian Hopps ; John E
> Drake ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura
> ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org;
> lsr-
> a...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-iet
gt;
> Cc: John E Drake ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org;
> 'Jeff
> Tantsura' ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-
> origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>> >>> protocol extension information?
>> >>> Certainly, we will not expand all the possible use cases in very detail,
>> >>> but
>> >>> putting some of them(some interesting, prominent use cases) in the
>> >>> appen
-Original Message-----
> >>> From: Aijun Wang
> >>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 12:06 AM
> >>> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; 'Christian Hopps'
> >>>
> >>> Cc: 'John E Drake' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org;
> lsr@ietf.org;
> >>&g
ff Tantsura' ;
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
Hi, Chris:
I think we have "put the cart before the horse". For protocol
extension draft, the origin is the use case.
And I think we
gt;> step.
>>Les
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Aijun Wang
>>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 12:06 AM
>>> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; 'Christian Hopps'
>>>
>>> Cc: 'John E Drake' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.or
Drake' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org;
'Jeff Tantsura' ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-
origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
Hi, Les:
As I stated clearly before, the appendix described in the draft is not the new
use case
-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-
> origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>
> Hi, Les:
>
> As I stated clearly before, the appendix described in the draft is not the new
> use case. It is the start point of this draft.
>
g (ginsberg)' ;
> lsr@ietf.org; 'Jeff Tantsura' ;
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>
> Hi, Chris:
>
> I think we have "put the cart before the horse". Fo
; 'Les Ginsberg
> (ginsberg)' ; lsr@ietf.org; 'Jeff
> Tantsura' ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-
> origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>
> Hi, Chris:
>
> I think we have "put the cart before the ho
: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
Agreed. Also as use cases go that does delve into implementation aspects of
which can vary significantly.
So to your point as Les and Chris mentioned the focus of LSR and drafts
published is on the protocol extension. How
ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
Isn't this just adding an analogous extension that already exists in RFC7794?
[WAJ] No. RFC7794 is just one example that to illustrate, as the companion IGP
protocol, OSPF can also accomplish this. And, actually, t
gt;
> 在2020-10-16，Christian Hopps cho...@chopps.org写道:
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人： Christian Hopps cho...@chopps.org
> 发件时间: 2020年10月16日 星期五
> 写道: [Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> ginsberg=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org]
> 主题： Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-o
a...@ietf.org;
> lsr-
> a...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>
> Hi, Les and experts in LSR:
>
> I am open to the removal of the this appendix to forward this draft.
[Les:] Great!! Please do so.
Les
> But as stated in prev
2020-10-16，Christian Hopps cho...@chopps.org写道:
-原始邮件-
发件人： Christian Hopps cho...@chopps.org
发件时间: 2020年10月16日 星期五
写道: [Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
ginsberg=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org]
主题： Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
> On Oct 16, 2020, at 1:51 AM,
ina...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org;
> lsr-...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>
>
>
> I support advancement of the draft.
>
>
>
> This draft follows along the lines of ISIS RFC 7794 to provide an
>
.@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg
>> (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-
>> lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org
>> Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>>
>> Hi, Les, John and Jeff:
>>
>> Let's reply you
Wang
>> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 6:51 PM
>> To: 'Jeff Tantsura' ; 'John E Drake'
>>
>> Cc: 'Christian Hopps' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg
>> (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-
>> lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org
>
John E Drake'
>
> Cc: 'Christian Hopps' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg
> (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-
> lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>
> Hi, Les, John and Jeff:
;
lsr-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
I support advancement of the draft.
This draft follows along the lines of ISIS RFC 7794 to provide an extension to
identify the prefix originator attribute using an originating router TLV
boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Jeff Tantsura
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 5:28 AM
> To: John E Drake
> Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; Les
> Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org;
> lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG L
s Ginsberg
(ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
+1
Regards,
Jeff
> On Oct 15, 2020, at 11:33, John E Drake
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Les
, October 15, 2020 2:15 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org;
lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps
Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
https
Hopps ; lsr@ietf.org
>> Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-
>> origina...@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>>
>> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>>
>>
>>
org
> > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org;
> > lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr- a...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps
> >
> > Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
> >
> > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
&
Hopps
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 11:15 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-
> a...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps
> Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>
> This begins a 2 week
Also, speaking as WG member and co-author, I support publication.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/15/20, 6:12 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote:
I am not aware of any IPR.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/15/20, 2:15 AM, "Christian Hopps" wrote:
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after
I am not aware of any IPR.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/15/20, 2:15 AM, "Christian Hopps" wrote:
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/
The following IPR has been filed
lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org;
> lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps
> Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
>
> https
Hi Chris,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPRs.
thanks,
Peter
On 15/10/2020 08:15, Christian Hoppsprotocol= application/pgp-signature
wrote:
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/
The
Hello,
I support the progression to publication and as co-author, I am not aware of
any undisclosed IPR.
Thanks,
Ketan
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps
Sent: 15 October 2020 11:45
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Oct 14, 2020, at 23:16, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/
>
> The following IPR has been filed
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/
The following IPR has been filed https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3448/
Authors,
Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any other IPR related
45 matches
Mail list logo
