Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-11-25 Thread Christian Hopps
The WGLC has completed. The documented was updated to address the objections made during the WGLC. The write-up will begin and publication will be requested. Thanks, Chris. > On Oct 15, 2020, at 2:15 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > Signed PGP part > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-20 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
g it to a draft that is >> (and should be) focused on simple protocol extensions. >> >> Thanx. >> >> Les >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Aijun Wang >>> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 6:51 PM >>> To: 'Jeff

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-20 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 Hello authors, I have a couple of comments. 1. A received Prefix Originator Sub-TLV that has an invalid length (not 4 or 16) or a Reachable Address containing an invalid IPv4 or IPv6

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Baalajee S (basurend)
Hello authors, I have a couple of comments. 1. A received Prefix Originator Sub-TLV that has an invalid length (not 4 or 16) or a Reachable Address containing an invalid IPv4 or IPv6 address (dependent on address family of the associated prefix) MUST be considered invalid and

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
>>> >>> Cc: 'Christian Hopps' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg >>> (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf- >>> lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org >>> Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-orig

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Christian Hopps
should be) focused on simple protocol extensions. >> >> Thanx. >> >> Les >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Aijun Wang >>> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 6:51 PM >>> To: 'Jeff Tantsura' ; 'John E Drake' >>&

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread John E Drake
> Cc: wang...@chinatelecom.cn; Peter Psenak ; Les > Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Christian Hopps > ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura > ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; > lsr- > a...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-o

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Aijun Wang
--Original Message- >>>> From: Peter Psenak >>>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 6:32 AM >>>> To: Aijun Wang ; Peter Psenak >>>> >>>> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Aijun Wang >>>> ; Christian Hopps ; >>>> John E Drake ;

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread John E Drake
re adding the prefix originator extension to > >> OSPF is NOT the broken use case in the appendix of the draft. > >>>> thanks, > >>>> Peter > >>>>> You can then write a separate draft to discuss other use cases and > >>>>> a

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Aijun Wang
k >> >> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Aijun Wang >> ; Christian Hopps ; John E >> Drake ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura >> ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; >> lsr- >> a...@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG L

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Aijun Wang
k >> >> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Aijun Wang >> ; Christian Hopps ; John E >> Drake ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura >> ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; >> lsr- >> a...@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG L

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Aijun Wang
k >> >> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Aijun Wang >> ; Christian Hopps ; John E >> Drake ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura >> ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; >> lsr- >> a...@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG L

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread John E Drake
un Wang ; Peter Psenak > > Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Aijun Wang > ; Christian Hopps ; John E > Drake ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura > ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; > lsr- > a...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-iet

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread John E Drake
gt; > Cc: John E Drake ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; > 'Jeff > Tantsura' ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- > origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > > [External Email. Be cautious of content]

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Aijun Wang
>> >>> protocol extension information? >> >>> Certainly, we will not expand all the possible use cases in very detail, >> >>> but >> >>> putting some of them(some interesting, prominent use cases) in the >> >>> appen

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Robert Raszuk
-Original Message----- > >>> From: Aijun Wang > >>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 12:06 AM > >>> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; 'Christian Hopps' > >>> > >>> Cc: 'John E Drake' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; > lsr@ietf.org; > >>&g

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Peter Psenak
ff Tantsura' ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 Hi, Chris: I think we have "put the cart before the horse". For protocol extension draft, the origin is the use case. And I think we

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Aijun Wang
gt;> step. >>Les >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Aijun Wang >>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 12:06 AM >>> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; 'Christian Hopps' >>> >>> Cc: 'John E Drake' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.or

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Peter Psenak
Drake' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; 'Jeff Tantsura' ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 Hi, Les: As I stated clearly before, the appendix described in the draft is not the new use case

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- > origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > > Hi, Les: > > As I stated clearly before, the appendix described in the draft is not the new > use case. It is the start point of this draft. >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Aijun Wang
g (ginsberg)' ; > lsr@ietf.org; 'Jeff Tantsura' ; > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > > Hi, Chris: > > I think we have "put the cart before the horse". Fo

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-19 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; 'Les Ginsberg > (ginsberg)' ; lsr@ietf.org; 'Jeff > Tantsura' ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- > origina...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > > Hi, Chris: > > I think we have "put the cart before the ho

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-18 Thread Aijun Wang
: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 Agreed. Also as use cases go that does delve into implementation aspects of which can vary significantly. So to your point as Les and Chris mentioned the focus of LSR and drafts published is on the protocol extension. How

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-18 Thread Aijun Wang
ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 Isn't this just adding an analogous extension that already exists in RFC7794? [WAJ] No. RFC7794 is just one example that to illustrate, as the companion IGP protocol, OSPF can also accomplish this. And, actually, t

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-16 Thread Christian Hopps
gt; > 在2020-10-16,Christian Hopps cho...@chopps.org写道: > -原始邮件- > 发件人: Christian Hopps cho...@chopps.org > 发件时间: 2020年10月16日 星期五 > 写道: [Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > ginsberg=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org] > 主题: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-o

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-16 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
a...@ietf.org; > lsr- > a...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > > Hi, Les and experts in LSR: > > I am open to the removal of the this appendix to forward this draft. [Les:] Great!! Please do so. Les > But as stated in prev

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-16 Thread 王爱俊
2020-10-16,Christian Hopps cho...@chopps.org写道: -原始邮件- 发件人: Christian Hopps cho...@chopps.org 发件时间: 2020年10月16日 星期五 写道: [Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ginsberg=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org] 主题: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > On Oct 16, 2020, at 1:51 AM,

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-16 Thread Gyan Mishra
ina...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; > lsr-...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > > > > I support advancement of the draft. > > > > This draft follows along the lines of ISIS RFC 7794 to provide an >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-16 Thread Aijun Wang
.@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg >> (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf- >> lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org >> Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 >> >> Hi, Les, John and Jeff: >> >> Let's reply you

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-16 Thread Christian Hopps
Wang >> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 6:51 PM >> To: 'Jeff Tantsura' ; 'John E Drake' >> >> Cc: 'Christian Hopps' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg >> (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf- >> lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
John E Drake' > > Cc: 'Christian Hopps' ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg > (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf- > lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > > Hi, Les, John and Jeff:

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
; lsr-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 I support advancement of the draft. This draft follows along the lines of ISIS RFC 7794 to provide an extension to identify the prefix originator attribute using an originating router TLV

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Gyan Mishra
boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Jeff Tantsura > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 5:28 AM > To: John E Drake > Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; Les > Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; > lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG L

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Aijun Wang
s Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 +1 Regards, Jeff > On Oct 15, 2020, at 11:33, John E Drake > wrote: > > Hi, > > I agree with Les

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Aijun Wang
, October 15, 2020 2:15 PM To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for: https

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Hopps ; lsr@ietf.org >> Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix- >> origina...@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 >> >> [External Email. Be cautious of content] >> >> >>

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread John E Drake
org > > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; > > lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr- a...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps > > > > Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > > > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for: &

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Hopps > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 11:15 PM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr- > a...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps > Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > > This begins a 2 week

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Also, speaking as WG member and co-author, I support publication. Thanks, Acee On 10/15/20, 6:12 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: I am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Acee On 10/15/20, 2:15 AM, "Christian Hopps" wrote: This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
I am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Acee On 10/15/20, 2:15 AM, "Christian Hopps" wrote: This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/ The following IPR has been filed

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
lsr@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; > lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps > Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06 > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for: > > https

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Chris, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPRs. thanks, Peter On 15/10/2020 08:15, Christian Hoppsprotocol= application/pgp-signature wrote: This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/ The

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hello, I support the progression to publication and as co-author, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: Christian Hopps Sent: 15 October 2020 11:45 To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Yes/support Regards, Jeff > On Oct 14, 2020, at 23:16, Christian Hopps wrote: > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/ > > The following IPR has been filed

[Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-06

2020-10-15 Thread Christian Hopps
This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Oct 29th, 2020, for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator/ The following IPR has been filed https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3448/ Authors, Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any other IPR related