Still waiting on this mail to the list.
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Jul 21, 2021, at 6:18 PM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> The WGLC has ended.
>
> I may have missed it but I do not see any feedback from Xiaodong Duan for
> IPR. That is still required to the list.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
>> On Feb 17,
The WGLC has ended.
I may have missed it but I do not see any feedback from Xiaodong Duan for IPR.
That is still required to the list.
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Feb 17, 2021, at 10:30 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> Hi LSR and TEAS,
>
> This begins a joint WG last call for:
>
>
ent: Wednesday, March 03, 2021 10:32 AM
> > To: Christian Hopps
> > Cc: teas-cha...@ietf.org; teas-...@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org; lsr-
> > cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis
> >
>
..@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis
>
> Speaking as WG member:
>
> As long as we are revising, I'd suggest changing "ISIS" in the title and
> several
> times in the text to "IS-IS" consistent with other IS-IS R
org; lsr-
> cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a few comments. Sorry to send these so late in the process. I
> support publication of this draft regardless of whether any acti
Speaking as WG member:
As long as we are revising, I'd suggest changing "ISIS" in the title and
several times in the text to "IS-IS" consistent with other IS-IS RFCs (at least
the newer ones).
Thanks,
Acee
On 3/3/21, 1:32 PM, "Donald Eastlake" wrote:
Hi,
I have a few comments.
Hi,
I have a few comments. Sorry to send these so late in the process. I
support publication of this draft regardless of whether any action is
taken on my comments.
1. Since there are non-allocation actions, I suggest that the first
sentence of Section 6 be more like "IANA is requested to take
Hi,
I support the publication.
thanks,
Peter
On 17/02/2021 16:30, Christian Hopps wrote:
Hi LSR and TEAS,
This begins a joint WG last call for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/
Please discuss any issues on the LSR mailing list. The WGLC will end March 3,
Hi,
I’m not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
Thanks.
s.
> On Feb 17, 2021, at 4:30 PM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> Hi LSR and TEAS,
>
> This begins a joint WG last call for:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/
>
> Please discuss any issues on the
Thursday, February 18, 2021 11:24 AM
> To: Christian Hopps ; lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; teas-cha...@ietf.org; teas-
> a...@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis
>
> Speaking as WG member, I support
sr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis
>
> Hi LSR and TEAS,
>
> This begins a joint WG last call for:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/
>
> Please discuss any issues on th
Hi LSR and TEAS,
This begins a joint WG last call for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/
Please discuss any issues on the LSR mailing list. The WGLC will end March 3,
2021.
Authors, please indicate wether you are aware of any IPR related to this
document to
12 matches
Mail list logo
