Acee -
Thanx for your - as always - meticulous review. I have posted an updated version incorporating your comments. Have you considered adding yourself to the IDNITs check? 😊 Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 11:24 AM > To: Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org>; lsr@ietf.org > Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; teas-cha...@ietf.org; teas- > a...@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis > > Speaking as WG member, I support publication. I've attached an rfcdiff with > RFC 5313 to aid others in their review. > > I have the following editorial comments on the changed lines: > > *** draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-00.txt.orig Thu Feb 18 13:58:31 2021 > --- draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-00.txt Thu Feb 18 14:20:54 2021 > *************** > *** 519,525 **** > 11 4 IPv4 TE Router ID > 12 16 IPv6 TE Router ID > > ! Detailed definitions of the new sub-TLV are described in > Section 3.4.1 and 3.4.2. > > 3.3. Sub-TLVs for Inter-AS Reachability TLV > --- 519,525 ---- > 11 4 IPv4 TE Router ID > 12 16 IPv6 TE Router ID > > ! Detailed definitions of the new sub-TLVs are described in > Section 3.4.1 and 3.4.2. > > 3.3. Sub-TLVs for Inter-AS Reachability TLV > *************** > *** 905,911 **** > > 6.1. Inter-AS Reachability TLV > > ! This document defines the following new ISI-IS TLV type, described in > Section 3.1, which has been registered in the IS-IS TLV codepoint > registry: > > --- 905,911 ---- > > 6.1. Inter-AS Reachability TLV > > ! This document defines the following IS-IS TLV type, described in > Section 3.1, which has been registered in the IS-IS TLV codepoint > registry: > > *************** > *** 936,942 **** > > As described above in Section 3.1, the sub-TLVs which are defined in > [RFC5305], [RFC6119] and other documents for describing the TE > ! properties of an TE link are applicable to describe an inter-AS TE > link and MAY be included in the inter-AS reachability TLV when > adverting inter-AS TE links. > > --- 936,942 ---- > > As described above in Section 3.1, the sub-TLVs which are defined in > [RFC5305], [RFC6119] and other documents for describing the TE > ! properties of a TE link are applicable to describe an inter-AS TE > link and MAY be included in the inter-AS reachability TLV when > adverting inter-AS TE links. > > Thanks, > Acee > > On 2/17/21, 10:31 AM, "Christian Hopps" > <cho...@chopps.org<mailto:cho...@chopps.org>> wrote: > > Hi LSR and TEAS, > > This begins a joint WG last call for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/ > > Please discuss any issues on the LSR mailing list. The WGLC will end March > 3, 2021. > > Authors, please indicate wether you are aware of any IPR related to this > document to the list. > > Thanks, > Chris, Acee, (Lou and Pavan).
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
