Re: [LTP] fork05 test case fails due to optimization

2009-04-11 Thread CAI Qian
From: CAI Qian Subject: Re: [LTP] fork05 test case fails due to optimization Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:02:41 -0700 (PDT) > > > > --- On Tue, 4/7/09, rohit verma wrote: > >> From: rohit verma >> Subject: [LTP] fork05 test case fails due to optimization >> To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net >

Re: [LTP] patch for mount02.c and mount03.c bugs(maybe)

2009-04-11 Thread Guo Hongruan
Hi, Qian The LTP I used is LTP-20090131. Maybe mount03.c has changed since then. For mount03.c, it does not work on my site. Let's support we execute mount03 using the following command: mount03 -D /dev/hda2 -T ext2 look at the following code in mount03.c before applying the patch 172

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Growfiles: Fix Test Failures

2009-04-11 Thread Jyothsna.ltp
I observed something in tlibio.h. LIO_IO_TYPES and LIO_WAIT_TYPES are not defined for uClinux. They are defined for other linux varieties like regular linux, cray, hp etc. but not uClinux. and that is why io_type gets a wrong value in fs/doio/growfile.c(though LIO_RANDOM bit inside is correct)

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Growfiles: Fix Test Failures

2009-04-11 Thread Jyothsna.ltp
Hi, I have LTP feb release and I have cross compiled it for our company's embedded linux.(UCLINUX) I have some problem as the below error prints for uClinux when random bit 'r' is passed else { printf("DEBUG %s/%d: No I/O method chosen\n", __FILE__, __LINE__ ); return -1; I

Re: [LTP] fork05 test case fails due to optimization

2009-04-11 Thread CAI Qian
--- On Tue, 4/7/09, rohit verma wrote: > From: rohit verma > Subject: [LTP] fork05 test case fails due to optimization > To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 5:57 PM > There is a change in compilation > mechanism in LTP from Feb 09 > distribution.The previous Mak

Re: [LTP] fork05 test case fails due to optimization

2009-04-11 Thread CAI Qian
--- On Tue, 4/7/09, rohit verma wrote: > From: rohit verma > Subject: [LTP] fork05 test case fails due to optimization > To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 5:57 PM > There is a change in compilation > mechanism in LTP from Feb 09 > distribution.The previous Mak

Re: [LTP] Latest LTP failes to build in Fedora11

2009-04-11 Thread CAI Qian
--- On Thu, 4/2/09, Poornima Nayak wrote: > From: Poornima Nayak > Subject: [LTP] Latest LTP failes to build in Fedora11 > To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 9:25 PM > Hi > > This could be issue with automake in fedora11, is there any > way to fix it ? > > m

Re: [LTP] Regarding ht_enable test case failure

2009-04-11 Thread CAI Qian
Hi, --- On Mon, 3/30/09, rohit verma wrote: > From: rohit verma > Subject: [LTP] Regarding ht_enable test case failure > To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 9:10 PM > O/P: > > > ht_enable    0  INFO  :  > Begin: HyperThreading Enabled > ht_enable    0  INFO  :

Re: [LTP] patch for mount02.c and mount03.c bugs(maybe)

2009-04-11 Thread CAI Qian
Hi, --- On Thu, 4/9/09, Guo Hongruan wrote: > From: Guo Hongruan > Subject: [LTP] patch for mount02.c and mount03.c bugs(maybe) > To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 11:41 AM > Hi, Guys, >     I think I found a bug of mount02.c and > mount03.c which can not vali