Acked-by: Subrata Modak as the mail id <
subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> is no more valid :-)
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> The maintain-ship of LTP is out of date, so update it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis
> Signed-off-by
Thanks Serge for a quick reply. Can you share git url which I can clone, I
am getting following error
git clone
git://git.selinuxproject.org/git/?p=users/serge/selinux-testsuite.git;a=tree
Cloning into selinux-testsuite...
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
Regards
Poornima
Serge Hal
Thanks a lot. It worked.
Regards
Poornima
Stephen Smalley
03/16/2012 09:43 PM
To
Poornima Nayak/India/IBM@IBMIN
cc
Serge Hallyn , James Morris
, ltp-list
Subject
Re: Are you still maintaining Selinux testsuite
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 21:29 +0530, Poornima Nayak wrote:
> Thanks Serge fo
Quoting Jan Stancek (jstan...@redhat.com):
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Serge Hallyn"
> > To: "Poornima Nayak"
> > Cc: "ltp-list" , "Stephen Smalley"
> > , "James Morris"
> > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 3:19:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: [LTP] Are you still maintaining Selinux test
- Original Message -
> From: "Serge Hallyn"
> To: "Poornima Nayak"
> Cc: "ltp-list" , "Stephen Smalley"
> , "James Morris"
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 3:19:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] Are you still maintaining Selinux testsuite
>
> Quoting Poornima Nayak (poornima.na...@in.ibm.com)
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:27:44PM +0800, Caspar Zhang wrote:
> Hi all, I'll merge this change to master if I don't hear any objections
> from you by today.
Fine for me. Copying Gong Chen who did most of the mce-test work recently
too.
-Andi
>
>
> On 03/09/2012 08:25 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> >
Quoting Poornima Nayak (poornima.na...@in.ibm.com):
> Hi Serge
>
> I was looking out for selinux test suite after the call was taken to move
> it out of LTP. Latest discussion is this
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/15301. Any progress beyond this
> ?
Hi Poornima,
yes, I'm sorry
On 03/16/2012 05:53 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2012, at 12:27 AM, Caspar Zhang wrote:
>
>> Hi all, I'll merge this change to master if I don't hear any objections
>> from you by today.
>>
>>
>> On 03/09/2012 08:25 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2012 12:50 AM, Caspar Zhang wrote:
Garrett Cooper said the following on 2012-3-16 17:48:
> On Mar 16, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>
>> On 03/16/2012 03:58 PM, Peng Haitao wrote:
>>
>>> There are 2 changes in this patch.
>>> 1. Initialize the aiocb struct before using it.
>>> 2. If Prioritized Input and Output option is s
On 03/16/2012 05:53 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2012, at 12:27 AM, Caspar Zhang wrote:
>
>> Hi all, I'll merge this change to master if I don't hear any objections
>> from you by today.
>>
>>
>> On 03/09/2012 08:25 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2012 12:50 AM, Caspar Zhang wrote:
On Mar 16, 2012, at 12:27 AM, Caspar Zhang wrote:
> Hi all, I'll merge this change to master if I don't hear any objections
> from you by today.
>
>
> On 03/09/2012 08:25 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> On 03/09/2012 12:50 AM, Caspar Zhang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Garrett, Andi, and all:
>>>
>>> When I loo
On Mar 16, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 03:58 PM, Peng Haitao wrote:
>
>> There are 2 changes in this patch.
>> 1. Initialize the aiocb struct before using it.
>> 2. If Prioritized Input and Output option is supported, submit the
>>aiocb with invalid aio_reqprio, else
On 03/16/2012 03:58 PM, Peng Haitao wrote:
> There are 2 changes in this patch.
> 1. Initialize the aiocb struct before using it.
> 2. If Prioritized Input and Output option is supported, submit the
> aiocb with invalid aio_reqprio, else submit the aiocb with invalid
> aio_fildes
>
> Si
There are 2 changes in this patch.
1. Initialize the aiocb struct before using it.
2. If Prioritized Input and Output option is supported, submit the
aiocb with invalid aio_reqprio, else submit the aiocb with invalid
aio_fildes
Signed-off-by: Peng Haitao
---
.../conformance/interfaces/
Hi all, I'll merge this change to master if I don't hear any objections
from you by today.
On 03/09/2012 08:25 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 12:50 AM, Caspar Zhang wrote:
>
>> Hi Garrett, Andi, and all:
>>
>> When I looked into current LTP tree, I found it a little messy due to
>> some
15 matches
Mail list logo