Kiran wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:38 -0400, Jeff Burke wrote:
>> Jeff Burke wrote:
>>> Kiran wrote:
>>>> Hi Subrata,
>>>>
>>>> This patch places the rt-migrate testcase into the
>>>> realtime/func/rt-migrate directory.
>&
Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Subrata Modak
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 15:45 -0400, Jeff Burke wrote:
> [...]
>> There should not be a failure for Build/Install when Kernel is >=
>&g
Nate Straz wrote:
> On Jul 7 17:22, Jeff Burke wrote:
>> Nate Straz wrote:
>>> On Jul 7 17:14, Jeff Burke wrote:
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>>> Before execute test you have 16 msg queues, that equal to limit value
>>>>> (by defa
Subrata,
It looks like this is a new test to LTP.
Re:[LTP] [ANNOUNCE] The Linux Test Project has been Released for JUNE 2008
17) Log Message:
utimensat() syscall was introduced from linux-2.6.22 onwards. Michael
wrote the initial testcases, and, the same is being contributed to LTP
u
Subrata,
I have applied and tested 4 out of the 6 patches that are attached.
Comments in line.
Matt Fleming wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've attached some patches that I created for LTP at work. Most of them
> simply add command-line options to specify the amount of memory/pages to
> use for t
Subrata,
When you added these test cases. What version of kernel did you
validate them with?
Test Version: ltp-full-20080630
Base OS: RHEL5.2
I am seeing the following results:
vanilla 2.6.24-7.72.el5
Testcase Result Exit Value
Nate Straz wrote:
> On Jul 7 17:14, Jeff Burke wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Before execute test you have 16 msg queues, that equal to limit value
>>> (by default 16)
>>>
>>> pls, try remove some unneeded msg queues and reexecute tests
&g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jeff Burke пишет:
>> Andrew Vagin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 02:16:11PM -0400, Jeff Burke wrote:
>>>> Andrew Vagin wrote:
>>>>> pls, provide more info: full log, ltp version and etc
>>>>> naveen penu
Jeff Burke wrote:
> Andrew Vagin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 02:16:11PM -0400, Jeff Burke wrote:
>>> Andrew Vagin wrote:
>>>> pls, provide more info: full log, ltp version and etc
>>>> naveen penumala wrote:
>>>>> hiee,
>>>&
Andrew Vagin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 02:16:11PM -0400, Jeff Burke wrote:
>> Andrew Vagin wrote:
>>> pls, provide more info: full log, ltp version and etc
>>> naveen penumala wrote:
>>>> hiee,
>>>>
>>>> Below test cases were fa
Rishikesh K. Rajak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did anyone face the same issue?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ltp-full-20080430/testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress]#
> ./message_queue_test_05
> ./message_queue_test_05: IPC Message Queue TestSuite program
>
> Creating 100 message queues ...
> ERROR [line: 146]
Rishikesh K Rajak wrote:
> Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/27/2008 09:31:47 AM:
>> On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 19:43 +0530, Rishikesh K. Rajak wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> While running ltp-full-2008043o through "./runltp"
>>> message_queue_test_02_ctl is failing as:
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks,
In the latest drop of ltp (ltp-full-20080531) I have noticed a couple
of things. The file ltp-full-20080531/testscripts/test_realtime.sh has
deviated even further from ltp-full-20080531/testcases/realtime/run.sh.
I thought the plan was to create a symlink between these two files.
Subrata Modak wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 08:25 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 17:14 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 08:42 -0400, Jeff Burke wrote:
Subrata Modak wrote:
Hi Serge,
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 09:02 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Not this week
Folks,
I am seeing the same results across the board on all archs. This is on
RHEL5-U1 with the 20080229 tarball. Has anyone else seen the same thing.
Jeff
Test Start Time: Fri Feb 29 16:06:19 2008
-
Testcase Result Exit Va
Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:44 +0900, Atsushi Tsuji wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I ran the latest LTP(ltp-20080131) on SLES10SP1 and found a failure on
>> the syslog testcases because of getting SIGSEGV at line 79 of
>> testcases/kernel/syscalls/syslog/syslogtst.c. it is caused by
>> ac
Jeff Burke wrote:
> Stephen Smalley wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:48 -0500, Jeff Burke wrote:
>>> Subrata Modak wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 09:08 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 18:56 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
>
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 08:48 -0500, Jeff Burke wrote:
>> Subrata Modak wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 09:08 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 18:56 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
>>>>> Stephen,
>>>&
Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 09:08 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 18:56 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
>>> Stephen,
>>>
>>> Any new Patches for LTP-Selinux ?
>> I don't have any updates, no.
>>
>> I have noticed that on x86_64, there are a number of FAILs that a
sudhanshu wrote:
> On Saturday 23 February 2008 23:25:10 Jeff Burke wrote:
>
>> sudhanshu wrote:
>
>> > On Friday 22 February 2008 15:40:52 Chirag Jog wrote:
>
>> >> * sudhanshu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-22 14:44:35]:
>
>> >>>
sudhanshu wrote:
> On Friday 22 February 2008 15:40:52 Chirag Jog wrote:
>> * sudhanshu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-22 14:44:35]:
>>> Hi ,
>>>
>>> There are numerous cleanups, fixes and features went into our locally
>>> maintained version of realtime tests, since its intergration in LTP
>>> decem
Pradeep,
Any word on this?
Thanks,
Jeff
Jeff Burke wrote:
> Pradeep,
> Yes the machines it fails to build on are numa systems. Here are the
> numa stats from one of the systems that failed.
>> * NUMA STAT*
>>
Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 10:43 +0100, Sebastien Dugue wrote:
>> Hi, (sorry, forgot the patches)
>>
>> here is V2 of the fixes and cleanups for the realtime testsuite.
>>
>> Changes V1 -> V2
>>
>> Addressed Darren's comments
>>
>> - patch 6: Fixed a withespace issue
e otherwise NON NUMA machine.
>
> Could you provide me , what are all the folders(nodes) are present in
> '/sys/devices/system/node' directory.
>
>
> Regards
> Pradeep
>
>
> Subrata Modak wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 17:34 -0500, Jeff Burke wr
Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 17:34 -0500, Jeff Burke wrote:
>> Subrata,
>> Was the attached patch.gz file tested successfully?
>> After applying the patch I still get the following error. I am running
>> on a RHEL5.1 x86_64 system.
>
> I tho
Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:49 -0500, Jeff Burke wrote:
>> Subrata,
>> Can you please delete this file from the tree. It looks like it should
>> not be there. It just creates an additional step for me when I creating
>> patches.
>>
>>
Subrata,
Can you please delete this file from the tree. It looks like it should
not be there. It just creates an additional step for me when I creating
patches.
ltp-full-20071231/testcases/pounder21/test_scripts/statslogging.orig
Thanks,
Jeff
-
Subrata,
Was the attached patch.gz file tested successfully?
After applying the patch I still get the following error. I am running
on a RHEL5.1 x86_64 system.
> patch -p0 patching file ltp-full-20071231/testcases/kernel/numa/numa01.sh
> patching file ltp-full-20071231/testcases/kernel/nu
Subrata,
Not sure what the exact issue was for me but I was not able to use the
patch in the previous email "as is" I had use the one attached.
But here are the issues I see. The new file that is created has the
same issue it is not executable. So one of two things need to happen .
Nivedita, Sudhanshu
I have one question about this test suite. According to the README The
tests should be logged in the logs directory. For example
ltp-full-20071231/testcases/realtime/logs ... correct?
Looking at the tree I do not see that directory:
drwxrwxr-x 2 testuser testus
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:50 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:43 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 19:33 -0500, Jeff Burke wrote:
>>>> Stephen, Joy, Dan and James
>>>>Using Steph
Folks,
I have attached a patch that provides additional INFO when the test
fails in the calloc portion of the test. The second part of the patch
fixes a cut and paste error(I think). It is suppose to be testing malloc
at this point but it still called calloc. So I replaced it with the
mallo
Subrata,
In my opinion it would be much better for this list to be on a wiki. So
we have one master list. That everyone can update. Also so we don't
loose items in the when people are replying. We could add links to the
wiki with examples of the failures. It would be nice to list the other
Sachin,
A couple of things I noticed right off the start. These files need to
be made executable.
/ltp-full-20070331/testcases/kdump/verify
/ltp-full-20070331/testcases/kdump/tests
/ltp-full-20070331/testcases/kdump/test
/ltp-full-20070331/testcases/kdump/sysinfo
/ltp-full-20070331/testcase
Subrata Modak1 wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
>
> Request you to kindly put the result of "diff -uprN" into a "
> .patch" and send across for this issue too.
>
>
> Regards & Thanks--
> Subrata Modak,
>
>
Subrata,
I have done
Subrata Modak1 wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
>
> Request you to kindly put the result of "diff -uprN" into a "
> .patch" and send across.
>
>
Subrata,
I have done what you requested. Here is the patch. Just out of
curiosity what was wrong with the last patch? The only diff between the
original one
Folks,
This is a patch that was tested and applied against the 20070228
version of ltp-full. The basic change was removing LOCTMP and adding in
the LTPTMP in its place and clean up files when it is done. Basically
the patch is mostly noise, IMHO I made the code more readable.
Thanks,
Jeff
Folks,
Short version -
Changed the way runltp makes the temp directory that is uses for
running test. Plus some spacing, indent changes. This is a patch that
was tested and applied against the 20070228 version of ltp-full.
Long version -
This was the error scenario I hit. When ru
38 matches
Mail list logo
