Good to know that.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Good news everyone.
> I'm happy to tell you that LTP is participating in the GSOC this year
> (the proposal and student are enlisted under the openSUSE organization
> though).
>
> So let me introduce you to Marios Makris w
Acked-by: Subrata Modak as the mail id <
subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> is no more valid :-)
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> The maintain-ship of LTP is out of date, so update it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hr
Are you sure that you have the 'glibc'(on linux) type counterpart
installed on your system ??
Without glibc your binaries will not run.
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 18:11 +0530, Josh! wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any Inputs ?
>
> Joshi
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Josh! wrote:
>
/adjtimex02.c:178:
> undefined reference to `adjtimex'
>
>
>
> Any suggestions on this error please..
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Rajender.G
>
>
> From: Subrata Modak [subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> S
p
etc.
Regards--
Subrata
>
> I think strip not owned by any package
>
> How to modify or configure my arm-linux-androideabi- strip binutils.
>
> Any suggestions please..
>
> Thanks
> Rajender.G
>
>
> From: S
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:28 +, G Rajender wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am Cross Compiling LTP-20110228 using arm-linux-androideabi cross
> toolchain.
> Im getting the below errors
>
>
> make[4]: Leaving directory
> `/media/C0AA04ADAA04A250/ltp-full-20110228/testcases/commands/ade/nm'
> make[4]: Enteri
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 13:06 +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Shubham Goyal
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Linux Test Project test suite has been released for the month of
> > FEBRUARY 2011. Please see ltp/INSTALL file carefully, as there has
> > been multiple changes
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 23:50 +0800, Caspar Zhang wrote:
> Hi all, seems that we don't have a new stable release for long time, any
> plan to release one?
Shubham will probably release one at the End of February 2011 :-)
Regards--
Subrata
>
> Thanks,
> Caspar
---
Garret,
Did you mean to comment something ? I did not receive any feedback in
the mail, just blank reply :-(
Regards--
Subrata
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 11:13 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Subrata Modak wrote:
>
> > Useful scripts under ltp/tools
Useful scripts under ltp/tools are no more installed @{LTP_ROOT}/tools,
they are done under @{LTP_ROOT}/bin. Change their reference accordingly
inside 'runltp' script. Nobody noticed this early as probably these
options are least used in LTP ;-)
Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak
---
di
Peter,
Is there a way to find true application code coverage for a
heterogeneous Executable Environment, where the application can consist
of:
1. C Programs(only for which .gcno and .gcda files can be
generated)
2. Shell Scripts,
3. Perl Scripts,
4. Python Scripts,
.
>
Should be fine. Lets concentrate and give you enough time to fix them. I
will release LTP in January-end then when things will stabilize to more
extent.
Regards--
Subrata
Thanks,
> -Garrett
>
> On Jan 3, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Subrata Modak wrote:
>
> > Garret,
> >
> &
Jiri,
I remember you submitted a patch years back on SCTP fix. I get the new
error on RHEL6:
# uname -a
Linux alien10.ltc.austin.ibm.com 2.6.32-71.el6.ppc64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 1
02:56:55 EDT 2010 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux
# cat /etc/issue
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.0 (Santiago)
Kerne
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 08:26 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Serge E. Hallyn
> wrote:
> > Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com):
> >> That being said, it still puzzles me why other folks attached to
> >> the project have been largely silent over the past co
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:18 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Shubham Goyal wrote:
> > Yes Iranna I agree with you and I also feel that "pounder21" tree should
> > not be removed from LTP. As you correctly said currently its difficult to
> > run LTP's pounder on stand
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:24 +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/4/2010 9:05 PM, Hannu Heikkinen wrote:
> > On 04/10/10 15:04 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> > -clip-
> > >
> > > Hannu,
> > > I don't think that it is a good to force the alig
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 12:29 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> > Hi!
> >> Cyril, thanks.
> >> Garrett, please pickup the mentioned patch I sent earlier.
> >>
> >
> > Garrett ping.
>
> Sorry -- thanks for the reminder. I'll talk to Subrata ab
I tested and reported back the results. The patch works fine. Can you
please find out if it has been committed to Linus tree and if yes, then
the commit id please ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 15:22 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> This is a dead loop
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 09:45 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:03:56 +0530
> Subrata Modak wrote:
>
> > If you run LTP Memory CGROUP Controller functional test on
> > linux-2.6.36-git7, the following Backtrace, OOMKill & rcu_sched_state
>
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 22:05 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:55 PM, wrote:
> > The basic purpose of this is a to test if it is possible to map and
> > unmap /dev/zero, and to read and write the mapping. Being inspired by
> > two bugs in the past, the design of the test wa
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 22:22 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Garrett Cooper [yaneg...@gmail.com] wrote:
> | On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Subrata Modak
> | wrote:
> | >
> | > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 18:43 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> | >> Garrett Coo
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:56 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >The code exists elsewhere with the openhpi package, is currently
> > not locked on the latest version, and doesn't fit cleanly in the build
> > or our runtime infrastructure. Do
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:48 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:36 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
> > Basic tests were to start several programs with same and different
> > memory contents and ensure only to merge the ones with the same
> > contents. When changed the content of one of m
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 00:26 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Gui Jianfeng
> wrote:
> > Bian Naimeng wrote:
> >> After applied commit 43b57dbb4b959203bda5743ee7ff36c627e0911c, some error
> >> are caught
> >> when install test suite.
> >>
> >> make[2]: Entering direc
However, yesterdayś git the failure was not there. And hence the reason
for me to replace the October tar.
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 15:58 +0900, Mitani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Build error occured with recent git "ltp-a997c94.tar.gz".
> This failure was caused by "realtime" as follows:
>
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:33 +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > According to the README...
> >
> > The MCE test suite is a collection of tools and test scripts for
> > testing the Linux kernel MCE processing features. The goal is to cover
> > most Linux kernel MCE processing code paths and f
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:54 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Murlin Wenzel wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 at 01:28 PM, in message
> > , Garrett
> > Cooper
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >>>Hasn't compiled for a while, and
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Linux Test Project for October 2010 has been released. You can pick
> up your copy from:
> http://ltp.sourceforge.net/
The release had an issue with . Since this issue been fixed in
git, i created a new tarball
FYI...!!
Original Message
Subject:Query regarding termination_id=4 in LTP.
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:08:56 +0530
From: naren.me...@gmail.com
To: man...@austin.ibm.com
CC: subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Hi,
I am not sure whom to ask this question so putting it
Anton Blanchard wrote:
Hi Subrata,
Subrata, could you test the patch below?
Yes, definitely. Givmme some time.
Did you get to test this patch? I can push to get it merged if it looks
good.
Yes, i was able to test this patch on 2.6.37-rc1 and everything looks
Ok. This can
Hi,
The Linux Test Project for October 2010 has been released. You can pick
up your copy from:
http://ltp.sourceforge.net/
Regards--
Subrata
--
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America cont
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 15:22 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> This is a dead loop:
> >>
> >> trace_hcall_entry() -> trace_clock_global() -> trace_hcall_entry() ..
> >>
> >> And this is a PPC specific bug. Hope some ppc guys will fix it?
> >> Or we kill trace_clock_gl
Stefen,
Can you please know your thoughts on this issue ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 01:04 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Executing LTP Ftrace Stress tests on 2.6.36-rc7, Power6 creates kernel
> Panic and xmon is invoked:
>
> Ways to reproduce the prob
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 00:07 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> I get a bigger trace with this patch:
However i merged this test cases with LTP just now except the default
running part. I will raise a bug internally and try to see if a fix is
available.
Regards--
Subrata
>
> Unable to hand
; > Li Zefan wrote:
> >> Subrata Modak wrote:
> >>> Li,
> >>>
> >>> Can you kindly fix the below issues and send me a new patch ?
> >>>
> >> Sure, I will.
> >>
> >
> > At a first glance, the kernel bug doesn&#x
Li,
Can you kindly fix the below issues and send me a new patch ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:35 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 10:50 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > We test ftrace by forking processes to simultaneously and
> > constantly read/
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 08:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > > Looks fine to be,i just need a little documentation file which would
> > > say:
> > > What securebits is all about (some pointers/links)? An
est run is over it will delete all .dmeg* files of zero size and
will retain only those having real entries. So, you will get exactly
which tests generated kernel messages and what the messages exactly are
for each individual test.
Regards--
Subrata
>
> Regards,
>
> Hake
>
>
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 12:22 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 13:30 +0800, hake huang wrote:
> > 2010/10/13 Garrett Cooper
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:38 PM, hake huang wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 13:30 +0800, hake huang wrote:
> 2010/10/13 Garrett Cooper
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:38 PM, hake huang wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I see this simple solution is no quite fit. But the kernel dump message
> > > for
> > > each test case is necessary for analysing. I ca
Hi Sravan,
1) File c.c is present in both git and the last August LTP release as
well
2) File c.c is building well on my Fedora 13 PPC64 Box:
# uname -a
Linux 2.6.35.4 #2 SMP Tue Sep 28 16:07:27 IST 2010 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64
GNU/Linux
# cat /etc/issue
Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
Kernel \r on an \m (\
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 20:32 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 08:56 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > This adds basic tests of the keepcaps securebits settings.
> >
> > Lots more securebits tests to come (see my email from one
> > or 1.5 years ago, a
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 08:56 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> This adds basic tests of the keepcaps securebits settings.
>
> Lots more securebits tests to come (see my email from one
> or 1.5 years ago, and, heck, write them if you have time :).
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn
Great, i get the
Hi,
I re-released August 2010 LTP due to some issues with the actual month
end release.Though the release contains all the changes that we have in
git till date, still i preferred to name it as AUGUST 2010 release
provided we will have our next release only at OCT 2010 end. I have
updated the foll
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 18:45 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 00:09 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> LTP for August 2010 has been released. Please pick your copy from:
&
Thanks. I have merged your patch. However you need to address the
following things in future:
1. All patches need to have a DCO signoff like: Signed-off-by:
Shubham ,
2. Create all your patches from LTP root: like:
diff -uprN ltp-*/testcases/*..*/file.orig ltp-*/testcases/*..*/fi
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 20:20 +0530, gowrishankar wrote:
> Hi Cyril,
> Do you wish to ack my patch ?
Cyril,
Waiting for your endorsement/rejection !!
Regards--
Subrata
>
> Thanks,
> Gowrishankar
>
> On Thursday 09 September 2010 01:49 PM, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Ca
I see the following commits already:
414747ced26d943a22a3f767deb7f5b4658adb6e
Date: Sun Aug 29 03:32:18 2010 -0700
and
228b250d23f36ddc95cb25179441420bea9b8bdd
Date: Sun Aug 22 15:02:43 2010 -0700
Regards--
Subrata
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 14:41 +0900, Mitani wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Scott,
Are you contemplating in submitting some patches for the HUGETLB tests
in LTP ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:55 -0400, Scott Romanowski wrote:
> >hi,
> > I am getting error in hugetlb testcase, most of the tests are
> failing
> >because of the following error:-
> >
> >"could
And for all future patches kindly provide as DCP signoff liike:
Signed-off-by: Scott Romanowski ,
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 11:08 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Thanks Scott. There was a problem in creating this patch:
>
> patching file testcases/kernel/syscalls/i
Thanks Scott. There was a problem in creating this patch:
patching file testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgctl/msgctl10.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 452 with fuzz 1.
patching file testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgctl/msgctl10.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 452.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
testca
Can both of you agree to send a single patch ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 22:19 +0530, gowrishankar wrote:
> On Monday 06 September 2010 09:46 PM, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Darren/Gowri,
> >
> > Are you aware of this patch ? Can you please
I think we missed this as well.
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 07:57 +0200, Liang, RenXiu wrote:
> In mtest06/mmap1.c, when handling the signal 11 in sig_handler, it
> doesn't cover another two race conditions:
> one is si_code equals "SEGV_MAPERR" but si_address does not equal to
> map_
Oliver,
Can you send us a patch to extend this testcase ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 12:44 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Thanks very much. Not sure why it did not reach the actual LTP mailing
> list :-(
>
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:5
Can you please send off a patch for this ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:55 +0200, Jacky.Malcles wrote:
> Hi,
> ltp-aiodio.sh script failed to find aio-stress testcase
>
> it failed as follows:
> initiation_status="pan(ltp-aiostresspart1): execvp of 'aio-stress' (tag
> ADS1044) fa
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 19:49 -0700, Henry Yei wrote:
> Please ignore the last patch. I attached an earlier incomplete version).
> Here is an updated patch which has the necessary ltp_signal.h include
> file for the SIGSETSIZE definition.
Garret,
Can you please review and apply this as well ?
Re
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 18:11 +0800, yangzi wrote:
> Hi
> Update the old patch,and the new patch is in the attachment,and please
> review this one.
Garret, i believe he is asking to consider this one and disregard the
earlier one.
Regards--
Subrata
>
> yangzi wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > When running
On Tue 2010-08-31 at 08:48 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Deepti Thite wrote:
> > ld01 test fails as native compilers don’t match in the expected and output
> > file.
> >
> > The attached patch will grep expected results from the output file generated
> > and will
Garret,
Did you get a chance to review these tests further ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 19:41 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Subrata Modak wrote:
> >> Thanks. I need to test this on a suitable kernel. But
Darren/Gowri,
Are you aware of this patch ? Can you please provide your comments ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 16:47 +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> The atomic_add() assembler for x86 is missing hint for gcc that value of
> v->counter is being modified by xaddl instruction and as
Garret, this patch ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 12:36 +0200, Yang, Wei wrote:
> Hi
>
> When running shmat01 on some platforms, it fails on
> "addr = shmat(*(tc.shmid), base_addr + tc.offset,tc.flags);"
> with a INVAL error. Look at codes in "setup()", it probes
> an available addres
Suzuki,
Can you please review this patch ?
Regards--
Subrata
Forwarded Message
From: Garrett Cooper
To: renxiu liang
Cc: ltp-l...@lists.sf.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [Patch] Fix mtest06 failure: caught unexpected signal
- 11 --- exiting
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 00:26:47 -0700
On Mo
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 06:12 -0400, Caspar Zhang wrote:
> This patch seemed not included in latest release?
Thanks for pointing that out. Pushed to git so that i do not forget
again ;-)
Regards--
Subrata
>
> Thanks,
> Caspar
>
> - "Caspar Zhang" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:04 P
Hi,
LTP for August 2010 has been released. Please pick your copy from:
http://ltp.sourceforge.net/,
Changes during last 2 months can be found here:
http://ltp.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ltp/ltp-dev.git;a=commitdiff;h=63bb9536f66b8117a723e99149ee8091dcae4fad,
Regards--
Subrata
--
Thanks. I need to test this on a suitable kernel. But doubtful if i can
add in the default run.
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 12:06 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> We test ftrace by forking processes to simultaneously and
> constantly read/write different tracing files in debugfs
> and procfs
Ok. Merged.
Regards--
Subrata
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 08:52 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Subrata Modak
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 17:05 +0530, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
> >> Current testcase for setrlimit resource RLIMIT_FSIZE
&
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 13:22 +0200, Fu, Yingang wrote:
> hi, Garrett
>
> This is a similar problem as rt_sigsuspend01 which has been fix
> before.
>
> Failed log:
>
> r...@congatec:/opt/ltp-full> ./testcases/bin/rt_sigprocmask01
> Segmentation fault
>
> After apply the patch:
> r...@congatec:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 12:26 +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> When creating package, the buildsysem freaks out on file
> tst_unzip_file.zip because it has world writeable permission, however
> this is not necessary for the test itself to work. Patch attached.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis chru
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 16:01 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Subrata Modak
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 18:43 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> >> Garrett Cooper [yaneg...@gmail.com] wrote:
> >> | On Wed, Aug 4,
Thanks very much. Not sure why it did not reach the actual LTP mailing list
:-(
Regards--
Subrata
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Dear Subrata,
>
> long time - no update ;-)
>
> But now i created a test that's able to detect a corrupt CAN frame flow
> inside
> the Kern
See this:
<<>>
tag=quota_remount_test01.sh stime=1281970608
cmdline="quota_remount_test01.sh"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<>>
incrementing stop
quota_remount_test010 TINFO : Successfully mounted the File
System
quota_remount_test010 TINFO : Successfully Created Quota Files
quota_remou
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 18:43 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Garrett Cooper [yaneg...@gmail.com] wrote:
> | On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> | wrote:
> | >
> | > pidns31: mq_open() fails with EACCESS.
> | >
> | > pidns31 test case fails with EACCESS - due to the leading '
Dropped.
Regards--
Subrata
commit b47b875e00fbea4bb3398ac2f3ef4b4dd32826f0
Author: Subrata Modak
Date: Mon Aug 16 20:08:51 2010 +0530
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 17:00 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> I am not sure about the original intent of pidns03 test case but I think
> the t
Dear All,
Peter has worked hard to release LCOV-1.9 for you. Please pick your
copies directly from:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ltp/files/Coverage%
20Analysis/LCOV-1.9/lcov-1.9.tar.gz/download,
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ltp/files/Coverage%
20Analysis/LCOV-1.9/lcov-1.9-1.src.rpm/downlo
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 17:05 +0530, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
> Current testcase for setrlimit resource RLIMIT_FSIZE
> is using a global integer variable to communicate the number of
> bytes from child to parent which is incorrect. This
> has been corrected by introducing a pipe to transfer
> this i
new version of the LCOV package but it appears
> that Subrata Modak (who usually handles this) is currently out of office
> and I'm wondering if anybody else can upload files to the LTP project site.
>
>
>
This is no more reproducible.
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 12:27 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Subject: LTPE MEMORY CGROUP FUNCTION tests fails
>
> Issues Description Below:
> ==
> # vi runtest/memcg_function
&
Fixed now with Latest LTP.
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 12:28 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Subject: LTPE timer_create04 fails
>
> Issues Description below:
> ===
> # ./runltp -s timer_create04
> <<>>
> timer_cre
Do you intend to submit the testcases still ??
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 01:36 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:17 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Subrata Modak (subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > > Hello everybody,
> > >
This also is resolved now.
Regards--
Subrata
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 18:27 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 21:10 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
> > On à´µàµà´¯à´¾à´´à´ 06 à´®àµà´¯àµ 2010 02:33 à´µàµà´àµ, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
> > > On à´µàµà´¯à´¾à´´
###"
Done executing testcases."
LTP Version: LTP-20100630
###"
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 10:53 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Clipping the outpu
This is fixed now in latest LTP.
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 01:04 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On May 5, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Subrata Modak wrote:
>
> > Subject: LTPÅ proc01 test fail
> >
> > Issues Description below:
> >
This is fixed now in the latest LTP.
Regards--
Subrata
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 01:04 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On May 5, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Subrata Modak wrote:
>
> > Subject: LTPÅ proc01 test fail
> >
> > Issues Description below:
> >
Garrett,
LTP Build is also compiling OPEN_POSIX_TESTSUITE. I think it is better
to put it outside the purview of Default LTP build. Let it be built
standalone as and when required by user. The Open_Posix build is taking
much time to complete and hence delaying other LTP builds :-(
Regards--
Subra
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 13:17 +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > This has not been reviewed/Acked !!
>
> Acked-by: Cyril Hrubis chru...@suse.cz
Thanks. Pushed.
Regards--
Subrata
>
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Garret,
This has not been reviewed/Acked !!
Regards--
Subrata
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 00:41 +0200, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch remove the TERRNO flag for the overall
> clock_getres01 test status. It is wrong because, if one of the test
> fails, the reported errno will always
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Fu, Yingang wrote:
> hi,
>
> We have lots of fixes for ltp. What's the process of contribution to it?
>
Good to know that you have lot of fixes for LTP. You need to follow the
following procedure:
1. Subscribe to this list first
2. Send patches to th
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 03:25 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Subrata Modak
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Garret,
> >>
> >> Latest LTP git creates install error:
> >>
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 03:23 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Subrata Modak
> wrote:
> > Hi Garret,
> >
> > Latest LTP git creates install error:
> >
> > make -C open_posix_testsuite
> > top_srcdir=/root/ltp-dev/testcas
Hi Garret,
Latest LTP git creates install error:
make -C open_posix_testsuite
top_srcdir=/root/ltp-dev/testcases/open_posix_testsuite install
make[2]: Entering directory
`/root/ltp-dev/testcases/open_posix_testsuite'
mkdir -p //opt/openposix_testsuite/bin/.
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `ru
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:31 +0900, Mitani wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Sorry!!
>
> I mistook to make following patch for hugetlb tests:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net/msg10249.html
>
> After the patch was applied, hugeshmget01 test will FAIL under the
> condition that huge
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:55 +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > > Attached patch adds types for functions in sources for fs-bench just
> > > because
> > > when function doesn't have return type it defaults to int and this causes
> > > problems (for example when doing return from such function wi
Probably, you would need to fix these:
patching file testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open10.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 282.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 311.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 359.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 389.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 440.
5 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open10.c.
Hi,
LTP for June 2010 has been released. Please pick your copy from:
http://ltp.sourceforge.net/,
Changes during last 2 months can be found here:
http://ltp.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ltp/ltp-dev.git;a=commitdiff;h=848f37617b3aee594408d399253d8e196095ca01,
Regards--
Subrata
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 12:12 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> ima_measure doesn't build correctly. It needs config.h to determine
> whether openssl headers are present, and verbose needs to be global.
> Broken by commit ef77253961f909f87e82e6d2b620e87af33e9665.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen D. Small
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:53 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
> > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 22:36 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:52 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 17
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 13:01 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday, July 01, 2010 12:52:07 Subrata Modak wrote:
> > + if find "$DMESG_DIR" -size 0 -exec rm {} + ; then
> > + echo "cd to $DMESG_DIR failed: $?"
> > +
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 12:48 +0530, Darshak Shah wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 12:07 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Darshak Shah
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/01/2010 10:36 PM, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >>
>
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:55 +0530, Gowrishankar wrote:
> Following set of patches applies code cleanup and functional changes
> in LTP realtime pi-test testpi-4. This test was not patched earlier
> when other pi-tests were fixed, with the intension of removing it
> from the suite due to similarity
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 10:50 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:53 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
> > > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 22:36 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:5
1 - 100 of 3271 matches
Mail list logo
