As you have asked the question on the LTSP list, let me propose a
simpler solution: set up an LTSP server, then you can boot up any PCs
on your LAN as XServers just by inserting an Etherboot floppy disk. Easy,
quick, and completely reversible.
John
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:02:26 -0800 (PST)
Alistai
When I try to run application with curses, I get this error :(
Thanks for any idea
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
__
Hi,
I've taken a look in the archives and on goolge but I seem un-able
to find a solution to what appears a simple question.
Does anybody provide an iso of a simple X-Server on a bootable CD?
I wish to put this in a desktop PC boot and then have my Linux
logon screen appear. I don'
Tim,
I've only been able to get the nasd sound daemon to work
with the jammin-125.
These are the settings that we recommend:
#
# For sound on the Jammin-125, you need ltsp_kernel-3.0.5
# or newer.
#
SOUND= Y
SOUND_DAEMON = nasd
I am using Jamming 125 workstations to run a remote office. All works
well except for the sound.
I set them up to use esound and it works, but frequently locks up the
jammin 125 completely. Anyone have any recommendations?
--
Tim Dinkins
home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
business: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ç
> >
> > > I made a boot disk at http://www.rom-o-matic.net/5.0.4/ .
> > > I selected a "Floppy Bootable Rom Image" for an rtl8139.
Well, I get an image from this site like you and for this model.
After you get the image you got to do:
cat /address/image >/dev/fd0
Firts, remember to format th
Hi All,
I'm using kdm when using LTSP & I use RedHat 7.2 as my O.S. and I get a lot
of errors like this on my /var/log/messages :
Jan 27 17:27:03 LTSP kdm[16454]: Greeter returned non-zero exit code 256
Jan 27 17:33:36 LTSP kdm[16672]: fatal IO error 113 (No route to host)
How do I make it stop
Yup..it is part of imagemagik(sp??).
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:57:27 -0800 (PST)
pedro noticioso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is part of the imagemagik package, not sure
> though, just try to run it, maybe you already have it
> installed 8)
>
>
> --- Tom Schouteden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Actuall over head on the openmosix cluster is less than 2% off bandwidth( check teh
openmosix FAQ wikki). Migration though can really eat bandwidth so you do need at
least 100mb cards you can channel bond teh servers to increase the pipe though.
Evan
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:58:37 -0600
"Baesema
Robert,
I went through your how to for the Nvidia driver and when I got to step
9 I hit a wall. There is no System.map in my "linux-2.4.19" source
directory. I'm running RedHat 8.0 using LTSP and of course it is
working. Now on step 6 when I do "make menuconfig" I just exited and
saved
James
I have the following packages installed
[root@linux etc]# rpm -qa | grep ltsp
ltsp_x336_svga-3.0.0-0
ltsp_kernel-3.0.5-0
ltsp_x_fonts-3.0.0-0
ltsp_x_core-3.0.4-0
ltsp_core-3.0.7-0
I set the lts.conf to:
[ws001]
XSERVER= XF86_SVGA
XF86CONFIG_FILE= XF86Conf
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:44:32 -0600
"Jerome Edwards LISD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone explain how to edit the GNOME menu items (i.e. add or remove
> icons in the games folder) for all workstations? Using K12LTSP / Redhat 8.0.
Ah yes, that's one bit of code that the boys and girls at Re
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:40:51 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Is there anybody who has souch a configuration (Ltsp + Win4Lin Terminal
> Server 2) running?
Yes, it works ok for us - http://uk.homelinux.org/index.php?s=15
However, it is licence aware, so only one user can run it at a time.
Als
On 27 Jan 2003 08:02:52 -
"nayan naya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using ltsp 3.0 on redhat 7.2 what will be the configuration
> of
> server for 50 machines what are the memory requirements if i want
> to
> run netscape ,Openoffice simultaneously on every machine.
>
> thanx
Jake Schroeder wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Alvaro wrote:
Jake Schroeder wrote:
It seems like you are also having a hostname problem, since your server
is unable to resolve the IP address 192.168.100.11 into the
workstation's hostname.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Alvaro wrote:
> Jake Schroeder wrote:
>
> >It seems like you are also having a hostname problem, since your server
> >is unable to resolve the IP address 192.168.100.11 into the
> >workstation's hostname.
> >
> What can you see in there that shows any prob
Keep in mind that if you cluster ltsp servers together it takes alot of
bandwidth. I
brought my local network to a grinding halt with 26 nodes running a mosix
kernel on the
clients. The mosix stuff needs fat pipe for all of the chatter that occurs
...
We recently switched our servers to redhat
Jake Schroeder wrote:
It seems like you are also having a hostname problem, since your server
is unable to resolve the IP address 192.168.100.11 into the
workstation's hostname.
What can you see in there that shows any problem ?
I can ping the ws001 by name or ip address from the server
I can
Can anyone explain how to edit the GNOME menu items (i.e. add or remove
icons in the games folder) for all workstations? Using K12LTSP / Redhat 8.0.
Thanks,
J Edwards
LISD
The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the
addressees only. If you have received
Thanks set 'RUNLEVEL = 3' the trick
Alvaro
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
It seems like you are also having a hostname problem, since your server
is unable to resolve the IP address 192.168.100.11 into the
workstation's hostname.
By the way, I have never been as impressed with syslog (of all things!)
as I was when I saw it working between several LTSP stations and the
s
Hi David,
> Quick question -
>
> Is there intended to be a version of LTSP to work with the new
United linux
> products? I've tried to install the latest ltsp-3 rpm's on SuSE's
version and
> it reports 'this platform is not supported' when I install the
rpm's.
quick answer: yes ;-)
well, per
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Alvaro wrote:
> Hi
> I just got started using diskless machine and pretty much everything has
> been straight forward. I just ran into some problem with the syslog on
> the diskless machine. It hust hangs there.
>
> It looks like is trying to connect the syslog server ( The
Hi
Iam little bit confused here, mounting server root
means /root. Then I think we may some problems with
local apps.
Is this link can solve this cluster problem.
http://www.k12os.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=14
Thanks
Vamsi
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually
Alvaro wrote:
Hi
I just got started using diskless machine and pretty much everything
has been straight forward. I just ran into some problem with the
syslog on the diskless machine. It hust hangs there.
It looks like is trying to connect the syslog server ( The server logs
the following
Jan
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:51:56 +0100
Michel van Horssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there an easy way of restricting what someone sees on the desktop (on a
> per user or group basis)?
The best sollution is probably to create a group that the users that should be
able to run all applcations i
Hi
I just got started using diskless machine and pretty much everything has
been straight forward. I just ran into some problem with the syslog on
the diskless machine. It hust hangs there.
It looks like is trying to connect the syslog server ( The server logs
the following
Jan 27 13:09:28 loc
Well I do not know if this will work for your window manager but it works
for
our kde desktops running on the terminal server. We drop into the users home
directory
and issue a chown -R root .Desktop . This totally locks the desktop settings
and allows no
one to change anyting. For mozilla we do
David,
Yes, I've got Suse SLES8, which is based on United Linux.
I plan on having support in LTSP for that, but just haven't had
the time to work on that yet.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, David Mummery wrote:
> Quick question -
>
> Is there intended to be a version of
My rudimantary solution is to install 2 or more
instances of a light window manager like qvwm, each
with its menus configured with the programs I want
their asigned users to have
Of course, you still have the risk of having users
just typing the name of their unauthorized programs,
but if they hav
Cheers Chris
I'll give it a go, Roger Whittaker (stood behind me) says Hi!
David
> SuSE 8.1 Professional is basically the same core product, users on the list
> have (I think) reported success with that distribution. I'd be interested in
> the answer as I might be about to use that very same pr
Title: Application management
Michael,
There
is a way and usually involves modifying the menus for the particular window
manager environment that you are using. (kde, gnome, icewm, etc.)
Each will have their menus in slightly different places. I know there is a
way to limit the menus by
SuSE 8.1 Professional is basically the same core product, users on the list
have (I think) reported success with that distribution. I'd be interested in
the answer as I might be about to use that very same product and it'd be
nice to know the answers in advance...
Cheers
Chris
-Original Mess
Quick question -
Is there intended to be a version of LTSP to work with the new United linux
products? I've tried to install the latest ltsp-3 rpm's on SuSE's version and
it reports 'this platform is not supported' when I install the rpm's.
The core rpm's are reported as installed by rpm -q 'pack
Title: Application management
Hi,
We're testing LTSP at the moment for (maybe) future use. A potential client would like to give it a try.
Had a basic setup working within 3 hours, 1 server 1 client.
Server is running RH 8.0
The question I have (i have more but will start with one) is
Hi Helmut,
I had it working once, with a testversion, but I had no errors on RedHat 7.3
with Kernel 2.4.19, patched as shown on the Netraverse-website and Win98SE.
Ciao
Cliff
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:40 AM
Su
Is there anyone who can help me out with this?
Should I try installing xfs? I remember hearing that xfs cannot cope
with a large amount of users (>~40)?
Any info would be welcome
tnx
tom
-Forwarded Message-
From: Tom Schouteden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Ltsp-
Hallo all,
we are running Ltsp 3.0 for a long time
very stable without any problems.
We use also rdesktop to connect to a
Win2K Application Server, also very stable.
We now try to install Netraverse Win4Lin
Terminalserver on the very same Server-Engine as Ltsp is running, without
great success.(
Anyone got any thoughts on running cross-over office as a local app?
-Original Message-
From: nayan naya
To: Chris Puttick
Sent: 1/27/03 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp capacity on server
thanx a lot
i have installed on wine and crossover and is running in all thi
Great !
I'll try that as soon as there are no users connected.
Thanks.
Romain.
Le lun 27/01/2003 à 11:21, Patrick W. Fraley a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> well I resurected my MDK 8.2 Install here is what I found:
>
> under /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs
>
> there needs to be some changes made.
>
> Under th
Hi all,
well I resurected my MDK 8.2 Install here is what I found:
under /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs
there needs to be some changes made.
Under the option start it has a -1 for a port take that option out, or
replace the -1 with a 7100 (or any other port you may wish to use).
In order for local X to
> > > > As some of you told me, it was a font server problem.
> > > >
> > > > XFree86_xfs is installed as a RPM
> > > >
> > > > "service xfs status" says that the service is running.
> > > > But in fact no server is running. If I start xfs manually, icewm works
> > > > on the LTSP worksation :-))
Hi nayan,
For 50 nodes as per the document U need Piv 1.4Gz with atlest 2Gb
ram.
But as i setup netscape to run locally i configured 50 nodes on
1GB ram with pIII 800.
Prakash
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 nayan naya wrote :
Hi,
I am using ltsp 3.0 on redhat 7.2 what will be the configuration
of
30-50 Mb/client + 256Mb. It would probably be best to load balance with this
many clients. If you have no plans to increase the number of users, have a
look at:
http://theseus.sourceforge.net/projects/ets/ets-howto.html
Chris
-Original Message-
From: nayan naya
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Title: MELODI GRAFIK DUYURU
www.melodilerim.com / www.grafiklerim.com Merhaba, Melodilerim.Com ve Grafiklerim.Com'dan haberiniz var mý ? Cep telefonlarýnýz için en geniþ melodi arþivi, 1800 melodi...Üstelik sürekli güncelleniyor. Ýþte "Ne Oldu Can - Kayahan" ve "Sen Yoluna Ben Yoluma - Çelik
Hi,
I am using ltsp 3.0 on redhat 7.2 what will be the configuration
of
server for 50 machines what are the memory requirements if i want
to
run netscape ,Openoffice simultaneously on every machine.
thanx in advance
Nayan.
---
This SF.NE
Hi,
I am using ltsp 3.0 on redhat 7.2 what will be the configuration
of
server for 50 machines what are the memory requirements if i want
to
run netscape ,Openoffice simultaneously on every machine.
thanx in advance
Nayan.
---
This SF.NE
--- Luis Hurtiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see nothing wrong with a 386 as a terminal, if you
> could make a 8086 than better still but it doesn't
> work with any kernel that I know, you use LINKS for
really? that would be fun, diskless 8086 terminals! 8)
http://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/8
48 matches
Mail list logo
