Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Slow Terminal Boot times

2004-08-17 Thread Sudev Barar
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 08:10, Peter Rundle wrote: > I'm experiencing slow boot times. The workstation is a 233Mhz Pentium with > 96Mb of Ram, a 10Mbit Tulip card and an AGP Phantom graphics card (8Mb). A hack, please try to put this workstation on a different port of the switch. I have faced simila

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Slow Terminal Boot times

2004-08-17 Thread Jim McQuillan
Peter, I'd say not normal at all. Even with that hardware, i'd expect the whole boot process to take no more than about 45 seconds. I see you are using a 10mbit card. First thing i'd look for is a problem with the negotiation between the card and the switch. You could try to cycle the power on

[Ltsp-discuss] Slow Terminal Boot times

2004-08-17 Thread Peter Rundle
G'day All, I'm experiencing slow boot times. The workstation is a 233Mhz Pentium with 96Mb of Ram, a 10Mbit Tulip card and an AGP Phantom graphics card (8Mb). Here's an example boot run with times in min:sec from power on. 0:00 Power on 0:25 Boot rom loaded 1:05 Kernel loaded 1:15 Pivot root 1:25

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] cannot open log file(repeat)

2004-08-17 Thread Jim McQuillan
Gary, I think you've got 2 different, unrelated problems: 1) The syslogd error is more of a warning. You need to configure your syslogd to allow remote clients to send their log messages. There are various ways to do this, depending on your distro. It's a '-r' option to syslogd that all

[Ltsp-discuss] cannot open log file(repeat)

2004-08-17 Thread garry
I'm sending this again because it did not seem to be delivered earlier, sorry if anyone gets duplicates. I am trying to get 4.1 up and running and have run into the following two error messages on the workstation: Syslogd cannot write to file handle on 10.35.180.231:514 fatal server error

[Ltsp-discuss] cannot open log file

2004-08-17 Thread garry
I am trying to get 4.1 up and running and have run into the following two error messages on the workstation: Syslogd cannot write to file handle on 10.35.180.231:514 fatal server error cannot open log file /var/log/Xorg.0.0.log At which point the boot stops. Can anyone point me in the

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Sugestions for clients?

2004-08-17 Thread Christian Collins
If I were looking for new equipment, I'd go with the HP thin clients at disklessworkstations.com. LTSP-ready out of the box. stan wrote: I'm thinking about using some og the (perhaps small form factor) motherboards with integrated video, and BIC to build a dozen or so clients. I prefere AMD proc

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Sugestions for clients?

2004-08-17 Thread jef peeraer
On dinsdag 17 augustus 2004 12:46, stan wrote: > I'm thinking about using some og the (perhaps small form factor) > motherboards with integrated video, and BIC to build a dozen or so clients. > > I prefere AMD processors, but would consider Intel. Anyone have any > sugestions as to machines that lo

[Ltsp-discuss] Dual headed clients?

2004-08-17 Thread stan
Anyone have experience buildign clients with 2 displays? I'm thinking of "single session" clients with just one keyboard/mouse, but 2 video cards, where teh mouse just moves from one (below) to thew other (aboave) dispaly. -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserv

[Ltsp-discuss] Sugestions for clients?

2004-08-17 Thread stan
I'm thinking about using some og the (perhaps small form factor) motherboards with integrated video, and BIC to build a dozen or so clients. I prefere AMD processors, but would consider Intel. Anyone have any sugestions as to machines that look like they would fill this nill? I'm thinking I can g

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Progress, but still not quite there

2004-08-17 Thread Ingo Bruell
Maybe one service was not properly started (dhcp or tftpd) -- best regards Ingo Bruell --- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OldenburgPGP-Fingerprint: CB01 AE12 B359 87C4 BF1C 953C 8FE7 C648 169E E5FC Germany PGP-Public-Key available at pgpkeys.mit.edu signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein