[Ltsp-discuss] NetVista 2200

2004-10-20 Thread Patrick Prue
I am now using Karl's Netvista kernel and the thin client seems to be booting properly to run level 3 , but when its switching to run level 5 it never initiates the X session on the screen .. Here below are the /var/log/messages from the server Oct 20 20:23:27 server rpc.mountd: authenticated mo

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Problems with MBA PXE

2004-10-20 Thread Jim McQuillan
Andrew, The DHCP server is on 192.168.1.1, but the client is saying DHCP 192.168.1.3 ? Seems odd. As for forcing it to use the tftp server on 192.168.1.3, try the 'next-server' keyword in dhcpd.conf. Jim McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi > I have

[Ltsp-discuss] Problems with MBA PXE

2004-10-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi I have a number of computers I am trying to boot from an LTSP server. The DHCP server is on 192.168.1.1, and everything else (i.e. TFTP, NFS, etc.) is on 192.168.1.3. Some of the clients have an onboard NIC with 3Com PXE 0.99j.03, and work fine. However, most have a PCI NIC with Lanworks

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Question about As400 LTSP and Netvista 8363's

2004-10-20 Thread Jim McQuillan
Patrick, what version of LTSP are you using? We've only recently added auto-detection of the USB keyboard. Jim McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Patrick Prue wrote: > I am currently working on getting LTSP running on an AS400 on an LPAR > running Redhat Enterprise for I-Series

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] How to test LTSP with a Windows client

2004-10-20 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> it. What about the real goal of LTSP? Access for diskless clients? Isn't > the idea of remote connections the main goal of it? LTSP is not a server service, protocol, program, or anything like that. LTSP is a operating system (further sub-category: Linux distribution) specifically tailored for

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Epia M in 1280X1024

2004-10-20 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> I installed LTSP 4.1 and I thought that Xorg supports the CLE266 of the > EPIA M boards. However, it is not detected. So it runs with VESA in > 1024x786 at the most. I have a 1280x1024 LCD and would like to change to > that resolution somehow. X_MODE_0 = 1280x1024 is ignored. Any ideas? I > appr

[Ltsp-discuss] Re: rdesktop intermittant failure - no error, just Grey + X pointer

2004-10-20 Thread Donald Teed
I have reproduced the intermittant rdesktop failure from a desktop machine having a different type of ethernet card and video, so it looks like that isn't the problem area. In the desktop case, rdesktop worked OK about 8 out of 10 tries. On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:39:19 -0300, Donald Teed <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Client Dual-Booting config ?

2004-10-20 Thread Andy Rabagliati
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Adam Bogacki wrote: > I've not seen any mention of configuring (say) Win98 and Debian unstable > in a client on either the LTSP site, > or Google. > > Can anyone point me in the right direction before I move on from LTSP > 4.1 install ? I suggest you install all the operat

[Ltsp-discuss] rdesktop intermittant failure - no error, just Grey + X pointer

2004-10-20 Thread Donald Teed
I have 3 Dell D600 notebooks for testing as clients to connect with a Windows 2003 server using rdesktop. I have a working configuration, but I find that the success in connecting has no logical pattern. It fails to connect about 30% of the time. Sometimes it seems like if I power up all 3 clie

[Ltsp-discuss] Question about As400 LTSP and Netvista 8363's

2004-10-20 Thread Patrick Prue
I am currently working on getting LTSP running on an AS400 on an LPAR running Redhat Enterprise for I-Series v3 using NetVista 8363 ( 2200 ) thin clients as the clients. And am unsure if this is a working solution. Has anyone gotten this to work ? I have followed the Netvista how to and haven't met

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] How to test LTSP with a Windows client

2004-10-20 Thread Edilmar
Craig Ringer wrote: On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 22:04, Edilmar wrote: Hi Darryl and others, I have used VNC before, "without LTSP", but I think this is very slow, because some users have dial-up connections. I have tried Windows TS only the these users get to use the systems fast, and I thought with Linu

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] usb devices

2004-10-20 Thread CPH
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 16:14, Tom Knowles wrote: > I have been trying usb gadgetry on lts terminals, scanner/card > reader/usb stick etc. The general setup seems to work when the gadget is > first plugged in. If subsequently removed and an attempt is made to > access the device then the autofs

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Client Dual-Booting config ?

2004-10-20 Thread Anselm Martin Hoffmeister
Am Mittwoch, 20. Oktober 2004 10:55 schrieb Adam Bogacki: > I've not seen any mention of configuring (say) Win98 and Debian unstable > in a client on either the LTSP site, > or Google. > > Can anyone point me in the right direction before I move on from LTSP > 4.1 install ? > > Adam Bogacki, > [EM

[Ltsp-discuss] Epia M in 1280X1024

2004-10-20 Thread Sebastian Siegel
I installed LTSP 4.1 and I thought that Xorg supports the CLE266 of the EPIA M boards. However, it is not detected. So it runs with VESA in 1024x786 at the most. I have a 1280x1024 LCD and would like to change to that resolution somehow. X_MODE_0 = 1280x1024 is ignored. Any ideas? I appreciate

[Ltsp-discuss] Epia M in 1280X1024

2004-10-20 Thread Sebastian Siegel
I installed LTSP 4.1 and I thought that it supports the CLE266 of the EPIA M boards. However, it is not detected. So it runs with VESA in 1024x786 at the most. I have a 1280x1024 LCD and would like to change to that resolution somehow. X_MODE_0 = 1280x1024 is ignored. Any ideas? I appreciate yo

[Ltsp-discuss] Client Dual-Booting config ?

2004-10-20 Thread Adam Bogacki
I've not seen any mention of configuring (say) Win98 and Debian unstable in a client on either the LTSP site, or Google. Can anyone point me in the right direction before I move on from LTSP 4.1 install ? Adam Bogacki, [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Th

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Network CD burning - GUI frontend?

2004-10-20 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> Try looking at http://joerghaeger.de/webCDwriter/ I did that, and...I'm just not satisfied. It will get the job done, but not elegantly enough. Plus it costs money for the DVD version, which is quite ok if it is just what I'm after, but if it is only half the solution I want then paying gets