Jim McQuillan wrote:
On Thu, April 6, 2006 10:20 am, Centro de Gestión Informática wrote:
Hi, I have the same problem. It's seems like ltspcfg doesn't detect the
display manager installed in Fedora Core 5.
The GDM in Fedora Core 5 has a different configuration, and ltspcfg hasn't
cau
Is there such a thing? Where can we download this?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group br
Hi, folks.
I put this problem in Fedora forum.
http://forum.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=103184
Enjoy time in Boston! :)
Maris
-- BUG
xdmcp.Can't call method "is_enabled" without a package or object reference at /usr/sbin/ltspcfg line 2071...Line 2071 in /usr/sbin/ltspcfg
On 07/04/06, matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> I want to start out by saying that I'm new to the list and haven't
> looked into this much yet, but I plan on setting up a server for home
> use shortly. One of the things I would like to do if possible is to
> disconnect a session, but allow any
Gideon Romm wrote:
Bob-
This is actually more of a question for the display manager that you use
than it is for LTSP. A straight X connection is stateless, and
therefore lacks the capability to do session migration (ala Windows
Terminal Services). BUT, X is also modular and powerful, which mea
Hello all,
I currently have a working LTSP (4.1) installation and was about to
migrate to LTSP 4.2 just this morning. Here are the steps I took:
1. rpm -ivh
http://ltsp.mirrors.tds.net/pub/ltsp/utils/ltsp-utils-0.20-0.noarch.rpm
2. ran 'ltspadmin' , pointed it to /opt/ltsp-4.2
3. installed all o
Tom,
The new local dev package is creating .desktop files in the users Desktop
directory. This is the method that both Gnome and KDE have settled on,
for creating icons on the desktop. I know it's a published spec, but I
don't know if any other desktop environments are following it yet.
Jim McQ
Jim McQuillan wrote:
Hello all,
It is with great pleasure that we are announcing the release of LTSP-4.2.
This is the release with the awesome local device support, and lots of
other cool new features.
Take a look at http://www.ltsp.org for more details.
I should assume that the notion that
Michael,
Forget about Ltsp-4.1.1, and go ahead and install LTSP-4.2. It contains
very nice support for local devices.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, April 6, 2006 5:33 pm, Michael Hoeller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use ltsp 4.1.1 and have a problem with local devices. I have set up my
> loc
On Friday 07 April 2006 02:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Hi all there,
>
> thanks for the responses. When I have an working kernel for 4.2 will try
> the nsc X driver. I have tried to make the tree on my suse 10 but I had no
> luck because suse is using gcc 4.
>
> I have an other server running a
Bob-
This is actually more of a question for the display manager that you use
than it is for LTSP. A straight X connection is stateless, and
therefore lacks the capability to do session migration (ala Windows
Terminal Services). BUT, X is also modular and powerful, which means
that it can be mad
I've started testing 4.2 and so far it works great! Great job -- you
know who you are.
I've seen recent and past threads talking about logging in from more
than one terminal. I use to do this but now I kill a user's processes
when he/she logs in and out. This solved some problems I was having
but
Perhaps you should try the new 4.2. They say it has excellent local
device support.
bob
On 4/6/06, Michael Hoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use ltsp 4.1.1 and have a problem with local devices. I have set up my
> local dev in lts.conf as:
> LOCAL_DEVICE_01= /dev/hdc:c
Hello,
I use ltsp 4.1.1 and have a problem with local devices. I have set up my
local dev in lts.conf as:
LOCAL_DEVICE_01= /dev/hdc:cdrom
LOCAL_DEVICE_02= /dev/fd0:floppy
LOCAL_DEVICE_03= /dev/sda1:cardreader
LOCAL_DEVICE_04= /dev/hda:festplatte
I have several terminals that only start a telnet session on startup.
On some of them, that have ATI cards, they display the penguin on the
screen. I recently upgraded to LTSP 4.2 and since then, the screens
never return to the standard 80x25 resultion...
Anyone have any thoughts???
Ah, I'll take this one. Phil, the variable to specify the xserver is
"XSERVER" not "X_SERVER". Try that, and it should work. I will try to
recreate your problem in the meantime.
-Gadi
PS: Does it work if SCREEN_01 = startx and SCREEN_02 = shell ?
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 14:56 +0100, Phil Davey
On Thu, April 6, 2006 10:20 am, Centro de Gestión Informática wrote:
> Hi, I have the same problem. It's seems like ltspcfg doesn't detect the
> display manager installed in Fedora Core 5.
The GDM in Fedora Core 5 has a different configuration, and ltspcfg hasn't
caught up with that yet.
Most of
Hi,
I found a "quick and dirty" solution for this, I just commented the whole
line 2071 out and the ltspcfg started fine and now everything works
fine...
.
Line 2071 in /usr/sbin/ltspcfg looks like this:
sub is_enabled {
my $self = shift;
main::verbose_dot();
my $result = 0
Hi, I have the same problem. It's seems like ltspcfg doesn't detect the display manager installed in Fedora Core 5.
Someone has a solution for this ?
Thanks,
Carlos Álvarez
El mié, 05-04-2006 a las 21:44 +0300, Sami Heikkinen escribió:
Hi,
I installed the LTSP 4.2 to Fedora Core 5, but I
Title: Secure XDMCP
Hi,
Is there a way to set up the secure XDMCP on LTSP 4.1 or 4.2?
Thanks,
Hong
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:42:57PM +0100, Benjamin Green wrote:
>
> LTSPFS is brilliant also, though I have found odd problems if one person is
> logged in to two terminals, and tries to access media on both. Sometimes
> the media disappears, others it doesn't appear in the first place. This is
This is not such an issue, as it is unlikely to be that useful to be
logged in twice.
We are huge fans/users of LTSP, currently running 4.1, and hoping soon
to start trying 4.2. Thanks for the new release--we're especially
looking forward to the device support.
I just want to say, though, th
it WORKS very well.
Your not kidding, boots so fast, superb. Can't wait to do a few more
installs/upgrades. Literally, I am doing one now.
LTSPFS is brilliant also, though I have found odd problems if one person is
logged in to two terminals, and tries to access media on both. Sometimes the
Hi.
I have problem after running ltspcfg, it shows this. Anyone knows, how to fix it? I'm using FC5 on my AMD x86_64.
--error--
ltspcfg - Version 0.13
Checking Runlevel: 5
Checking Ethernet Interfaces
Checking Dhcpd
Checking Tftpd
Checking Portmapper...
Checki
On 06/04/06, Jim McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Which kernel did you build for LTSP-4.2?
> In the cases that I've heard about, the kernel doesn't even finish loading
> before it crashes and reboots.
>
> This is likely a problem with mknbi.
>
> Can you tell me which version of mkn
In 4.2, if I set:
SCREEN_01 = startx
then the video card is detected ok and everything works.
However, if I set:
SCREEN_01 = shell
SCREEN_02 = startx
then it doesn't work. The startx script correctly detects the video card,
however build_x4_cfg leaves the driver line empty. I've found
Op donderdag 6 april 2006 14:51, schreef Jim McQuillan:
Hi all there,
thanks for the responses. When I have an working kernel for 4.2 will try the
nsc X driver. I have tried to make the tree on my suse 10 but I had no luck
because suse is using gcc 4.
I have an other server running asterisk a
Hi,
Is there a way to set up the secure XDMCP on LTSP 4.1 or 4.2?
Thanks,
Reday
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and j
Peter,
Which kernel did you build for LTSP-4.2?
In the cases that I've heard about, the kernel doesn't even finish loading
before it crashes and reboots.
This is likely a problem with mknbi.
Can you tell me which version of mknbi you are using?
FYI... I used mknbi v1.4.4 on a Ubuntu Dapper Flig
Ondrej Valousek schrieb:
> Here are my comments I have to the new LTSP:
> Disadvantages:
> - "echo -e '\007'" on console does not produce a beep any longer (does
> anyone know advice?)
Since kernel 2.6 PC Speaker is now a configurable option. In the
2.6.15.4-ltsp-1 kernel it's configured as mod
Hi all,
It does indeed seem that rsyncing to another box off-site is a very
popular solution.
And so many projects to choose from. Long live GNU!
Now I just have to setup this remote box with disks to save everything on to. :)
Thanks once again.
Chris.
On 4/6/06, Esko Virtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Ok, I can answer myself some of my questions :-]
Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here are my comments I have to the new LTSP:
> Disadvantages:
> - Power button does not work any longer (although it should, ACPI is
> fully enabled on my machine)
>
It still does not. But echo "shutdown" > /sy
--- Sorry Jim badly set reply-to header on mail from list.
On 05/04/06, Jim McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Philip,
>
> I have to confess that I didn't test LTSP-4.2 with the J-125. I'm in
> Boston this week for Linux World, but when I get back, I'll give it a
> test, and see what's up. P
Hi all,
Here are my comments I have to the new LTSP:
Disadvantages:
- Power button does not work any longer (although it should, ACPI is
fully enabled on my machine)
- "echo -e '\007'" on console does not produce a beep any longer (does
anyone know advice?)
- DPMS is still not supported (although
Chris Fanning kirjoitti:
backups.
Any suggesting or clues please.
Chris.
I have used this for some years and I'm quite pleased with it:
"Easy Automated Snapshot-Style Backups with Linux and Rsync"
http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/
Esko
---
35 matches
Mail list logo
