On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:52:39PM -0800, john wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One of the reasons I originally found LTSP compelling was the modest
> specs required of the thin clients. Lately I've been feeling like my
> flavor of Linux/LTSP (ubuntu) has entered the same kind of systems
> requirement arms-ra
Hi Alkis,
On 3/3/2009 7:43 AM, Άλκης Γεωργόπουλος wrote:
> I've started a page in ubuntu wiki for this:
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/FlowControl
Fantastic! I was hoping someone would get this written up in a wiki.
You did a really good job summarizing the situation and what t
Hi Keith
Play with ethernet flow at your own peril :)
There will be a lot of improvements in the future , wait until there is real
proof.
Andy will pick up on things like that if anyone will in our area.
To change the file size,
sudo su
rezize2fs /dev/md0
no size says it will expand to fill the wh
Στις 03-03-2009, ημέρα Τρι, και ώρα 14:19 +0200, ο/η Keith έγραψε:
> This all sounds awesome. We have Planet switches - no place to adjust flow
> contorl. How do I do this with software? We are using Ubuntu 8.10 & LTSP 5?
>
> - Keith
I've started a page in ubuntu wiki for this:
https://help.ubun
This all sounds awesome. We have Planet switches - no place to adjust flow
contorl. How do I do this with software? We are using Ubuntu 8.10 & LTSP 5?
- Keith
- Original Message -
From: "Άλκης Γεωργόπουλος"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Beware
Just reporting that I did a benchmark with flow control = off.
Before: speed ~= 90 Mbps
After: speed ~= 900 Mbps
So upgrading the clients to gigabit isn't really required! A switch
with a single (or two, if bonding is used) gigabit ports is enough! :)
Thanks Jason, you saved a lot of people a lo
