Re: [Ltsp-discuss] nic bonding vs multiple dhcp scopes on separate nics

2009-11-12 Thread john
Hi all, > Yeah, seems like the original document is here > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/marcelo/linux-2.4/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt Just a follow up for posterity. I see that the document I as looking at was very old. The latest version is available from http://source

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] nic bonding vs multiple dhcp scopes on separate nics

2009-11-12 Thread john
Hi Jordan On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jordan Erickson wrote: > TBH I don't think so. With everything I've read (including today in > trying to answer your question), mode=0 doesn't require any switch > configuration whatsoever. Almost all the sites that explain the modes > have copied the i

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] nic bonding vs multiple dhcp scopes on separate nics

2009-11-12 Thread john
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Jordan Erickson wrote: > Hey John, > > I've personally set up network bonding on 7 LTSP servers (2x 1Gbit/sec > each) running Ubuntu 8.04. If you choose the right bonding "mode" you > don't need a special switch at all (I used mode=0 myself, which is not > only pre

[Ltsp-discuss] gnome3 and LTSP

2009-11-12 Thread Chris Fanning
Hi, Please point me to the thread if this is an old topic. My question is about Gnome3 I think, as I'm sure most people here also do, that LTSP (and NX) are very powerful tools. Centralized management is important and remote desktops make it easy. The ability to use old or low-powered equipment i

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] slow client performance

2009-11-12 Thread Xavier Brochard
I use Thincan too (but more recent ones) There was some problemq with the geode display driver: - it was not in the chroot by default install xserver-xorg-video-geode in the chroot and update your image - it was not allways launched by XWindow edit the lts.conf file with something like this: [Thi