Hi James,
James McQuillan schrieb am 20.09.2012 20:05:
> I'm sending this message at 2:05PM EDT (18:05GMT).
here is the header of the received mail. Seems there are some delays at google
and sourceforge.
Regards
Helmut
> From ltsp-discuss-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Sep 20 20:41:10 2012
>
I'm in the process of trying to set up a LTSP server on Ubuntu 12.04.
I've run into a bit of a problem. Ldm does not work for password
expiration. An expired password cannot be updated with ldm. It simply
restarts.
I filed a bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ltsp/+bug/1053447 and It
seems Ubuntu
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:05:44PM -0400, James McQuillan wrote:
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
Two things I've noticed on this general topic:
* Mailman doesn't have a meaningful approach to user or administrator
management by default.
* Various google mailing li
I have been testing LTSP on Lubuntu and Edubuntu with simple 2-PC setups.
I found today that local sound does not work right on the Lubuntu LTSP
client. On several client sessions, Audacious and Rhythmbox played
MP3's over the speakers attached to the server. On another session,
Rhythmbox pr
Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:05:44 -0400
Boston Ma area.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, James McQuillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
>
> One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
> sending out messages.
>
> I'm sending this message
Hi Jim:
Fyi, I received 20:46 CEST (2hrs plus GMT).
/sb
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
John Hupp wrote:
Received 2:39 EDT
On 9/20/2012 2:05 PM, James McQuillan wrote:
Hello all,
We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
One thing
Thanks for the idea.
But my newbie reaction: I looked at pssh, but it seems to require
specification of target hosts. Won't the client host-name be the same
as the server host-name?
On 9/20/2012 12:54 PM, David Burgess wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, John Hupp wrote:
I'm ready to
2:39 PM EDT
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:05:44PM -0400, James McQuillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
>
> One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
> sending out messages.
>
> I'm sending this message at 2:05PM EDT
On 20 Sep 2012, at 19:05, James McQuillan wrote:
> If some of you would look at what time you received this message and respond
> with the time (and timezone) that you received it, then we can get a sense
> for how fast/slow this mail server is.
Here's the Received: header lines from my copy
On 20/09/12 19:05, James McQuillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
>
> One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
> sending out messages.
>
> I'm sending this message at 2:05PM EDT (18:05GMT).
>
> If some of you would l
Arrived 2:04 pm EST
Joseph
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:05 PM, James McQuillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
>
> One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
> sending out messages.
>
> I'm sending this message at 2:05P
Received 2:39 EDT
On 9/20/2012 2:05 PM, James McQuillan wrote:
Hello all,
We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow
at sending out messages.
I'm sending this message at 2:05PM EDT (18:05GMT).
If some of y
18:43 UTC :)
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/F
12:39PM MDT (1839 GMT)
db
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:05 PM, James McQuillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
>
> One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
> sending out messages.
>
> I'm sending this message at 2:05P
Hello all,
We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
sending out messages.
I'm sending this message at 2:05PM EDT (18:05GMT).
If some of you would look at what time you received this message and
respond wit
Στις 20/09/2012 06:25 μμ, ο/η Alessandro Dentella έγραψε:
> This is not working for me, as I reported last week. Even thought I added
> the FSTAB_1 line (please tell me where it's documented, I only see an
> example in the source but no doc page), /home is not mounted and sshfs gets
> in the way.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, John Hupp wrote:
> I'm ready to install an APC UPS to power a 2-PC Lubuntu LTSP network. I
> want the UPS to gracefully shut down the LTSP server and client in the event
> of an unattended power outage.
>
> Under normal operation, you can't simply shut down the s
I'm ready to install an APC UPS to power a 2-PC Lubuntu LTSP network. I
want the UPS to gracefully shut down the LTSP server and client in the
event of an unattended power outage.
Under normal operation, you can't simply shut down the server with the
client running. System policy prevents it
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:39:13PM +0300, Alkis Georgopoulos wrote:
> Στις 19/09/2012 12:21 μμ, ο/η Juan Antonio Martinez έγραψε:
> > - If not, what's the right way to handle an ldap/nfs environment with
> > Ubuntu 12.04's ltsp fat_client ?
>
> If you export the whole /home from your NAS server, t
El mié, 19-09-2012 a las 15:10 +0300, Alkis Georgopoulos escribió:
> Στις 19/09/2012 02:50 μμ, ο/η Juan Antonio Martinez έγραψε:
> > Not sure if this solution work for us:
> Yup, with the additional info you gave it probably doesn't suit you out
> of the box, so you'd need to patch the ltsp script
20 matches
Mail list logo
