[Ltsp-discuss] flow control revisited

2013-12-28 Thread rkwesk_ltsp
I thought I had this figured out but I'd like to confirm: Configuration 1 unmanaged switch w 1 giga port and 16 100 ports not connected directly w router Server with two nics, one gigabit to giga port on switch and one 100 bit to router directly. Clients, mixed thin and fat but all with 100

[Ltsp-discuss] LTSP fails on Ubuntu with mainline kernels?

2013-12-28 Thread John Hupp
I have been trying to pin down what seems to be an NBD-related kernel bug (which I have posted about here). I determined that the behavior appears between Ubuntu kernels 3.10.0-4.13 and 3.10.0-5.14. The older Ubuntu kernels are OK. The Ubuntu-to-mainline kernel map indicates that these Ubuntu

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP fails on Ubuntu with mainline kernels?

2013-12-28 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Στις 28/12/2013 08:37 μμ, ο/η John Hupp έγραψε: But I have not been able to get LTSP to work with any of the mainline kernels I tested: 3.10.1, 3.9.6, 3.8.13, 3.7.5, 3.6.3 all fail. LTSP in Ubuntu is using overlayfs or aufs, and noone of them is mainlined yet, so you can't use a mainline

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] flow control revisited

2013-12-28 Thread Jakob Unterwurzacher
On 28.12.2013 12:18, rkwesk_ltsp wrote: I thought I had this figured out but I'd like to confirm: Configuration 1 unmanaged switch w 1 giga port and 16 100 ports not connected directly w router Server with two nics, one gigabit to giga port on switch and one 100 bit to router directly.

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] flow control revisited

2013-12-28 Thread rkwesk_ltsp
On 2013-12-28 22:18, Jakob Unterwurzacher wrote: On 28.12.2013 12:18, rkwesk_ltsp wrote: I thought I had this figured out but I'd like to confirm: Configuration 1 unmanaged switch w 1 giga port and 16 100 ports not connected directly w router Server with two nics, one gigabit to giga