Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Icon on all workstations?

2003-01-13 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
We run kde on our terminals and have different workcenters running on the same server. To accomplish what you are talking about we just create a admin user for each work center. I log into the admin account and place a desktop icon pointing to the application. I then run a script that overwrites ev

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] mini-itx compact flash terminal box

2003-01-09 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
We did consider a pxe boot also but we hate having to maintain all of the pieces, dhcp, pxe, nfs root etc plus the added network load. Cliff On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 13:29, alvin wrote: > Baeseman, Clifford wrote: > > >Well guys I found a solution to booting a mini-itx from compact

[Ltsp-discuss] mini-itx compact flash terminal box

2003-01-09 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
Well guys I found a solution to booting a mini-itx from compact flash and pointing it to a linux server running xdm. I downloaded a 32M compact flash image from this site. I then replaced the startup scripts with my own and overwrote the password and shadow files with my own. http://locustworld.co

[Ltsp-discuss] via epia and compact flash

2003-01-07 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
Speaking of the VIA mini-itx, we are currently trying to get a peewee linux compact flash image together for it. Once we have a working one I will post the image. It will not be a ltsp image per say but a image that will let you point it at a server running xdm. Cliff Baeseman -

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP

2003-01-02 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
h as screen savers. > > Michael Marschall > President > > Pipeline Networks > 2385 Executive Center Drive Suite 100 > Boca Raton, Florida 33431 > Phone 561.962.2774 > Cell 305.502.8959 > > On 2 Jan 2003, Baeseman, Clifford wrote: > > > I don't remem

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP

2003-01-02 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
base network it runs just fine, anything over twenty and the traffic really starts to be a issue. Cliff On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 12:18, John N wrote: > What were you running? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Baeseman, Clifford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > T

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP

2003-01-02 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
Well it is a great idea if you have a gig running on everything. We tried this on production machines one time and saturated the switches . We hit total network saturation at about 24 clients. Needless to say everything came to a grinding halt. Cliff On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 11:07, John N wrote: >

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] OpenBrick question

2002-12-30 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
Much better to look at the mini-itx platform if you ask me. The form factor is about the same but much, much cheaper and no fans required. Cliff On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 08:20, Stephen Liu wrote: > Hi Anselm, > > Thanks for your information. > > Is it OpenBrick available for sale on Internet? Or

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] wmp11 and linux

2002-12-17 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
I know a guy that attempted it but I think he gave up after fighting it a whole lot. The WET11 is another story all together, plug it into the pc's ethernet port and away you go..no drivers needed. Cliff On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 10:36, Jason A. Pattie wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Ha

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Wireless LTSP

2002-11-26 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
I can tell you how we do our's which is extremely simple We run redhat on the client disk which allows us to do a redhat kick start install for doing a large amount of similar clients at the same time. Kickstart loads a minimum installation to the hard drive and a post install script changes t

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Wireless LTSP

2002-11-21 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
We have in fact done wireless clients but I am not sure about that WMP11 card. I have heard of people having a ton of troubles getting those to work with linux. We use a cisco 350 PCI and or a linksys WET 11 on the linux clients. The WET11 is my personal favorite since it provides a straight ethern

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Walmart Microtel as terminal.

2002-10-23 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
We did try one here and it works just fine, we do not run ltsp per say but a similar architecture. The only difference is we use a bone stock redhat server and load minimal linux with X on each workstation machine. We are seriously considering using the Microtel computers since they come preloaded

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] X-connection to a random server

2002-09-26 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
you can set up a round robin dns to do the load balancing also. Cliff Baeseman Greenheck Fan Corporation Linux Servers Administrator On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 04:25, Hans Ekbrand wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:15:46AM +0200, Andreas Schlager wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > a question: > > > > I h

[Ltsp-discuss] failover solution

2002-06-06 Thread Baeseman, Clifford
Gents has anyone done a deployment that involves some sort of failover mechanism. We are running a bunch of clients now and are worried about a hardware failure situation. We do not really run a ltsp installation but run under the same type of architecture. We can buy really cheap machines 100 buc