On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 12:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Varun wrote:
> > I have a server on Mandrake 9.1 and ltsp 3xxx.
> > ( athlon 1700+ , ASUS A7N 266 + 512MB DDR ram )
> > My server display settings are 800x699x16bit color.
> > I am using vmware 4.02 and winXPPro as
On Sunday 28 October 2001 11:01 am, Jim McQuillan wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> What porting are you doing?
>
> I've already completed the RH7.2 port, and it is included in
> lts_core2.09pre4, which will be on the LTSP download
> pages later today.
Is there anywhere (like a cvs server ) that I can get pr
Hello, I have a need to run ltsp on a redhat 7.2 server. I downloaded the
latest ltsp release (2.0.9 pre3) and tried to port it to redhat 7.2.
I started this process with the assumption (perhaps an ignorant assumption)
that 7.2 is basically the same as 7.1. So I created a new symlink in the
On Saturday 03 November 2001 08:26 pm, geoffrey wrote:
> I was setting up ltsp-2.09pre4 on a SuSE 7.3 server today, and I have had
> a horrible time getting X to work for me. The cards that I used for the
> 2.08 setup that I replaced are near impossible to get configured
> correctly. I found a pci
> Obviously the problem is somewhere with the XDMCP request to the server. I
> can't tell if the client is making the request and the server is ignoring
> it, or if the client is failing to make the request, and I don't know where
> to look, or how to tell the server PC to log these requests some
> XDM: too many retransmissions
>
> I looked a little closer at my server setup and noticed that it is not
> listening on port 177 (the xdmcp port according to /etc/services). I don't
> know how to make the system listen on this port. Do I need to further edit
> xinetd? Please advise.
OK... I'
> Okay, most of the time I would get the "no screens" error, or I would get
> a flicker that never resolved into a stable gdm login screen. Eventually
> the X server would always crash with the "no screens" error. The one
> system where I swapped out its card - I am unsure what card was in it, but
Hello, I was just wondering what the status of RPM's for 3.0 are. I
currently have LTSP installed using the tar.gz files, but on production
servers I always prefer RPM's.
Thanks much, LTSP is awesome!
_
Ltsp-discuss mailing l
Thanks for the quick response. Is there somewhere I can get to them between
the time you upload them and the time they show up on the download site? I
will wait if I have to, but I wasn't sure if there was a direct FTP site or
something.
Thanks again...
On Monday 17 December 2001 01:13 pm,
On Monday 14 January 2002 10:37 am, Juan Carlos Zarta Escobar wrote:
> Hello
>
> All the workstations run netscape (one instance each one) and the error
> is Netscape its unable to create socket connections..
>
Not sure this is the answer, but I beleive sockets use file handles, so you
might
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> A switch really helps when there are multiple servers and the workstations
> aren't all talking to the same server all the time.
>
You can also throw multiple NIC's into the server and therefore have more
than 100Mbps to the switch. You can tell s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello, here is my situation. I am converting a netork of windows PC's to
LTSP. Everything is working well, but we can't switch over until this last
problem is worked out.
Currently these windows PC's use Accuterm to connect to a text based
appli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 21 January 2002 02:27 pm, Julius Szelagiewicz wrote:
> Matthew,
> unfortunately, it is a "brainer". Xterm does very good job
> emulating vt100 and vt200 series and ok job with vt320, that is if you use
> XF86. any other terminal in cha
Hello, I have installed LTSP for a client and it's having a lot of problems.
Here are the details:
Redhat 7.2 with all the latest errata update.
LTSP 3.0 from rpms
IBM Netfinity Server, PIII 500 w/ 256M RAM, nice fast SCSI raid 5 disk setup.
Approx 20 users running KDE 2.2.2 (official redhat rpms
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Feb 19 19:18:24 vertov nscd: 985: while accepting connection: Too many open
> files in system
We are getting similar errors on our box (I have upgraded to 768M of ram, and
we no longer are swapping). I have file-max set to 2^16 (65536), doing lso
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 19:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes indeed, we will be there with a booth
> in the .org pavilion.
>
> In fact, anyone in the area that can spare a few hours to help
> out would be most welcome.
Jim, I would be glad to help. I'm in the area also, I just need to know w
im.
>
> If anyone knows how to contact Matthew, Please pass this on
> to him.
>
> Thanks,
> Jim McQuillan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 06:17:15 -0500 (EST)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To:
echo 32000 > /proc/sys/fs/file-max
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 23:19, Ramasubramani Venkatasubramaniam wrote:
> Hi
>
> In My LTSP Server it has shown error "VFS: file-max limit 8192
> Reached" and all the dumb terminals closed their operations.
>
> How do i rectify this error.
>
> Please help ASAP.
]:Greeter returned non-zero exit code 256
>
> kdm[3412]: fatal IO error 104 (connection reset by peer)
>
> how to solve this.
>
> thanks
>
> regards
>
> mani
>
> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Agreed, now if I can just remember some of those jokes...
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 13:31, Ed Weinberg wrote:
> It was great joining the LTSP/OO/rom-o-matic people for dinner
> Thursday. The HP dinner the day before was free, fun, and had known
> entertainment, and the IBM dinner Thursday had stretch
One thing to keep in mind. IMAP doesn't always allow concurrent access
to mailboxes. If more than one user needs to access the mailbox at the
same time, then you need to be careful.
Specifically UoW IMAP (the default shipped with redhat) stores it's
messages in standard Unix format, this does
21 matches
Mail list logo
