d, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thierry Dumont
mailto:tdum...@math.univ-lyon1.fr>> wrote:
We switched recently from Ubuntu 10.04 to Ubuntu 12.04 (servers, ltsp
server, ltsp client).
Since then, our system as turned *extremely* *slow*; the worst is
attained when using KDE product
I recall our problem:
-> migrating from Ubuntu 10.04 to Ubuntu 12.04 => many application
became very slow, and KDE extremely slow.
A partial "solution":
When migrating qt4 switched from 4.6 to 4.8 the "graphicssystem" changed
from "native" to "raster". This generates a *huge* X11 traffic on the
We switched recently from Ubuntu 10.04 to Ubuntu 12.04 (servers, ltsp
server, ltsp client).
Since then, our system as turned *extremely* *slow*; the worst is
attained when using KDE products like Kile (not only when logged in the
KDE environment, but also in Gnome), which cannot be used (wait some
Hi,
We switched recently our servers and ltsp server to Ubuntu 12.04
(former version was 10.04).
Our users want Gnome, xfce, KDE... so we install all these environments.
Some important tools are know very very slow:
-kde : 5 seconds to open a shell on a 8 core machine, 32 gb, 7 users
-kde
Hello,
We switched all our installation (servers and ltsp server) to Ubuntu 12.04.
Since that, some of our thin clients do not find automatically the good
screen resolution (this used to work perfectly well wit Ubuntu 10.04).
Thin clients concerned: HP T5570.
Any idea?
Yours,
t.d.
<>-
I have an ldm server (Ubuntu 12.04) and 2 interactive servers: one in
Ubuntu 10.04 and one in 12.04; gnome, kde, xfce are installed on both.
On the terminals, I can see a long list of available sessions, which
does not seem to be coherent with the really available sessions in both
interactive ser
Yesterday I asked on this list about a problem of load balancing with
get_hosts.
We solved it.
Actually, the script ldm in /opt/ltsp/i386/usr/lib/ltsp/screen.d says:
# Server scalability. If there exists a /usr/share/ltsp/get_hosts file,
then
if [ -x /usr/share/ltsp/get_hosts ]; then
at whe want to take account of.
Yours
t.d.
> Le jeudi 30 septembre 2010 à 13:07 +0200, Thierry Dumont a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have a working installation of LTSP with a LTSP server (in charge of
>> the thin clients). The thin clients connect on an other server. Al
Le 30/09/2010 13:29, asmo.koski...@arkki.info a écrit :
>
>> Now we want to add a new server, and the clients must connect users to
>> server one or two.
>>
>> I tried to implement the "load balancing" as described in the chapter
>> "Session dispatching" of the documentation
>
> I did have two year
Hello,
We have a working installation of LTSP with a LTSP server (in charge of
the thin clients). The thin clients connect on an other server. All this
is working perfectly.
Now we want to add a new server, and the clients must connect users to
server one or two.
I tried to implement the "loa
The classical installation for nbd whith LTSP is to start it through
inetd. inetd listen on TCP/2000 and launch with the script nbdrootd an
instance nbd-server.
This process stay alive few seconds and new instances have to start. We
have some temporary problems at starting LTSP's clients. The c
s ?
Yours
Thierry Dumont.
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.
completely broken (but excepted this, ltsp
works fine on both clients).
Do you know some way:
-to improve the display during boot,
-or one way to suppress this banner ?
Yours very sincerely.
Thie
GREAT!!! This is working!!!
(We have VIA based materail too).
Very, very sincerely yours!
t.d.
Helmut Lichtenberg a écrit :
> Hi Thierry,
>
> Thierry Dumont schrieb am 12. May 2010 um 09:18:31 CEST:
>> We are currently migrating our servers to ubuntu and our terminals to ltsp.
>
sp-cluster-lbagent 2.0.2-0ubuntu1
ltsp-server 5.2.1-0ubuntu9
ltspfs
and on the "working" server: ltsp-server, l
15 matches
Mail list logo
