I would argue that you should use a switch (not a hub) when using ltsp. A switch will definitely minimize network collision. Whenever you are running multiple diskless clients it's important that you reduce as much network bottleneck as possible to maximize performance. Using 100/Mb switches in
> On 17 Oct 2002 17:21:13 +, Joyce LAMBERT wrote
> > When ltsp is used, i can notice lots colision when using ltsp. More tere
> > are worstation working and more colision i have.
> >
> > So with 4 worstation, the network become realy slowly and can't be used.
Hi,
I have exactly the same p
My old "8 ports 10mb" hub didn't let more than 3 workstrations work
together. I bought a low cost "8 ports 100mb" switch and now there are 6
workstations going very fast.
Romain.
Le jeu 17/10/2002 à 19:49, Bhaskar S. Manda a écrit :
> On 17 Oct 2002 17:21:13 +, Joyce LAMBERT wrote
> > When lt
Joyse,
dump the hubs, start using switches. julius
On 17 Oct 2002, Joyce LAMBERT wrote:
> Hello
>
> One big probleme with using ltsp
>
> When ltsp is used, i can notice lots colision when using ltsp. More tere
> are worstation working and more colision i have.
>
> So with 4 worstation, th
On 17 Oct 2002 17:21:13 +, Joyce LAMBERT wrote
> When ltsp is used, i can notice lots colision when using ltsp. More tere
> are worstation working and more colision i have.
>
> So with 4 worstation, the network become realy slowly and can't be used.
This could be a faulty network configuratio
Hello
One big probleme with using ltsp
When ltsp is used, i can notice lots colision when using ltsp. More tere
are worstation working and more colision i have.
So with 4 worstation, the network become realy slowly and can't be used.
As someone have this pb
or some understand what can the netw
