On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 11:40:41AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hans,
>
> LBX and SSH are doing roughly the same thing. Both
> will compress the data stream. SSH offers the added benefit
> of encrypting the data too.
openSSH will only compress the data stream if called with the -C
switch.
Hans,
LBX and SSH are doing roughly the same thing. Both
will compress the data stream. SSH offers the added benefit
of encrypting the data too.
I talked with Keith Packard, he's the guy who originally
wrote the LBX extensions for X, and he informed me that LBX
was going away. When I asked hi
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:25:32PM +0200, Martin Herweg wrote:
> you can also have single windows/applications from a remote Server
> on you local desktop:
>
> c> xhost +SERVER
> c> ssh SERVER
> s> xterm &
>
> or maybe
>
> c> xhost +SERVER
> c> ssh SERVER
> s> export DISPLAY=CLIENT:0
> s> xterm
Hi all!
in case you dont read the rest of the mail:
---
did anyone try LBX together with xdm/kdm/gdm ?
---
Scott Middleton wrote:
> X -broadcast
> or
> X -query
>
> in my case i like to have a local sessio
