On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 11:33:27PM -0500, David Johnston wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 08:31, rob apodaca wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:45:29 -0800 (PST)
> > pedro noticioso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking about the approach of separating
> > > servers for different applica
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 08:31, rob apodaca wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:45:29 -0800 (PST)
> pedro noticioso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was thinking about the approach of separating
> > servers for different applications, meanning that if
> > the server that serves the office app dies, it w
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:45:29 -0800 (PST)
pedro noticioso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking about the approach of separating
> servers for different applications, meanning that if
> the server that serves the office app dies, it will be
> the only app not available until the server reboots
> > I was thinking about the approach of separating
> > servers for different applications, meanning that if
> > the server that serves the office app dies, it will be
> > the only app not available until the server reboots,
> > without killing the complete sessions.
>
> Not necessarilly a good i
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, pedro noticioso wrote:
> I was thinking about the approach of separating
> servers for different applications, meanning that if
> the server that serves the office app dies, it will be
> the only app not available until the server reboots,
> without killing the complete sessi
I was thinking about the approach of separating
servers for different applications, meanning that if
the server that serves the office app dies, it will be
the only app not available until the server reboots,
without killing the complete sessions.
What do you think about the idea? is it possible?
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:50:56AM -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On 4 Nov 2002, Tom Lisjac wrote:
>
> > I've got a "how-to" almost ready to release on this subject.
> >
> > Unfortunately I'm the only one that's performed the configuration
> > procedure I describe in the document... so I'd be very i
On 4 Nov 2002, Tom Lisjac wrote:
> I've got a "how-to" almost ready to release on this subject.
>
> Unfortunately I'm the only one that's performed the configuration
> procedure I describe in the document... so I'd be very interested in
> hearing from anyone who might like to add a second server
> We would like to set up multiple LTSP servers to balance load and provide
> redundancy.
> Does anyone have any pointers/suggestions?
I've got a "how-to" almost ready to release on this subject.
Unfortunately I'm the only one that's performed the configuration
procedure I describe in the docume
We would like to set up multiple LTSP servers to balance load and provide
redundancy.
I could have sworn I saw some people doing this on the mailing list but I
cannot find it there on on the site.
Does anyone have any pointers/suggestions?
Thanks,
Don
10 matches
Mail list logo
