Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go?

2002-12-20 Thread jam
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jim- > Glad to here LTSp is moving to be service centric. That should make it much more >portable also. Are tehre plans to support BSD style start scripts or just System V? Well, there are no plans for BSD support, because the 'L' in LTSP stands f

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go?

2002-12-19 Thread barnowl
Jim- Glad to here LTSp is moving to be service centric. That should make it much more portable also. Are tehre plans to support BSD style start scripts or just System V? Evan --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating? G

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go?

2002-12-19 Thread jam
sad > > if at the end Linux > > went the way of Unix. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: John McCreesh > > To: Jim Rich > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 12/19/02 4:55 PM > > Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go?

2002-12-19 Thread pedro noticioso
5 PM > Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will > go? > > The blessing / curse of open-source is that there > are 110 ways of doing > the same thing. I would suggest that LTSP should > target a couple of > common distros, and be able to say (e.g.): > > "

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go?

2002-12-19 Thread Chris Puttick
Better still, make it LSB compliant. It would be sad if at the end Linux went the way of Unix. -Original Message- From: John McCreesh To: Jim Rich Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/19/02 4:55 PM Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go? The blessing / curse of open-source is

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go?

2002-12-19 Thread John McCreesh
The blessing / curse of open-source is that there are 110 ways of doing the same thing. I would suggest that LTSP should target a couple of common distros, and be able to say (e.g.): "Take your RedHat 8.0 CD - do a clean install with the following options: (desktop/server/whatever) - make sure

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go?

2002-12-18 Thread John N
gt; To: "Jim Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:13 PM Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go? > The real problem with what yall want is that LTSP is not really a program at all. IT is just a fancy config

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go?

2002-12-18 Thread barnowl
The real problem with what yall want is that LTSP is not really a program at all. IT is just a fancy config script for other apps. Evan > Brian > > I agree with you. The installation process is needs to be > perfected to the point of "hands free" or have a very smart > automated trouble-shooter

[Ltsp-discuss] RE: A forking we will go?

2002-12-18 Thread Jim Rich
Brian I agree with you. The installation process is needs to be perfected to the point of "hands free" or have a very smart automated trouble-shooter. I feel lucky (not competent) if I am able to install LTSP. I disagree with you for only supporting the two distros and the two "machine profiles"