ng performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
> See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
> 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
> 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
> -1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the aut
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:05:44PM -0400, James McQuillan wrote:
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
Two things I've noticed on this general topic:
* Mailman doesn't have a meaningful approach to user or administrator
management by default.
* Various google mailing li
Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:05:44 -0400
Boston Ma area.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, James McQuillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
>
> One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
> sending out messages.
>
> I'm sending this message
Hi Jim:
Fyi, I received 20:46 CEST (2hrs plus GMT).
/sb
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
John Hupp wrote:
Received 2:39 EDT
On 9/20/2012 2:05 PM, James McQuillan wrote:
Hello all,
We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
One thing
2:39 PM EDT
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:05:44PM -0400, James McQuillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
>
> One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
> sending out messages.
>
> I'm sending this message at 2:05PM EDT
On 20 Sep 2012, at 19:05, James McQuillan wrote:
> If some of you would look at what time you received this message and respond
> with the time (and timezone) that you received it, then we can get a sense
> for how fast/slow this mail server is.
Here's the Received: header lines from my copy
On 20/09/12 19:05, James McQuillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
>
> One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
> sending out messages.
>
> I'm sending this message at 2:05PM EDT (18:05GMT).
>
> If some of you would l
Arrived 2:04 pm EST
Joseph
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:05 PM, James McQuillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
>
> One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
> sending out messages.
>
> I'm sending this message at 2:05P
Received 2:39 EDT
On 9/20/2012 2:05 PM, James McQuillan wrote:
Hello all,
We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow
at sending out messages.
I'm sending this message at 2:05PM EDT (18:05GMT).
If some of y
18:43 UTC :)
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/F
12:39PM MDT (1839 GMT)
db
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:05 PM, James McQuillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
>
> One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
> sending out messages.
>
> I'm sending this message at 2:05P
Hello all,
We're evaluating alternatives for the mailing list server.
One thing we've been hearing is that the current list server is slow at
sending out messages.
I'm sending this message at 2:05PM EDT (18:05GMT).
If some of you would look at what time you received this message and
respond wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
