Re: [Ltsp-discuss] avoiding bloating the image for fat clients

2012-01-02 Thread Lachele Foley (Lists)
"For the future, it is planned that LTSP chroots will be bootable read-write..." This would be useful. The issue for us isn't so much the graphics, but, for certain circumstances, in being able to have the programs see the client hardware at installation (e.g., virtualbox or nvidia drivers from s

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] avoiding bloating the image for fat clients

2012-01-02 Thread Todd O'Bryan
I did not realize that you could run an X program in the chroot. I had tried running the whole desktop in the chroot, but never thought to try running a specific program. That makes things much less annoying. Thanks for the info! Todd On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Alkis Georgopoulos wrote: >

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] avoiding bloating the image for fat clients

2012-01-02 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Στις 02-01-2012, ημέρα Δευ, και ώρα 11:29 -0500, ο/η Todd O'Bryan έγραψε: > You'd also be able to install a new program or make a tweak without > having to rebuild the image and restart the clients, wouldn't you? Not to my knowledge. Run `dpkg -L firefox` and see where the "firefox" package puts i

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] avoiding bloating the image for fat clients

2012-01-02 Thread Todd O'Bryan
You'd also be able to install a new program or make a tweak without having to rebuild the image and restart the clients, wouldn't you? Based on what you said, I feel less inclined to worry about the size of the image, but the issue above is annoying. I also still haven't figured out a good way to

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] avoiding bloating the image for fat clients

2012-01-02 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Στις 02-01-2012, ημέρα Δευ, και ώρα 10:52 -0500, ο/η Todd O'Bryan έγραψε: > In other words, can I just start with the bare minimum image and then > install all the other programs I want somewhere and mount that from > the server? Why? What are you trying to gain? The fat client image isn't loaded

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] avoiding bloating the image for fat clients

2012-01-02 Thread Lachele Foley (Lists)
I think I'm the one who said that. I'm not sure how to do what you want. Maybe some fancy combination of symbolic links and targeted chrooting would do. Maybe you could find a way to have /usr be a separate mount entirely. Actually... that might work. You'd have to be tricksy about it. I'll g

[Ltsp-discuss] avoiding bloating the image for fat clients

2012-01-02 Thread Todd O'Bryan
I have a lab of (mostly, soon to be all) fat clients. I was able to buy parts and put together a small case with a modern mobo and CPU for less than $200, and managed over 2 years to buy enough to fully stock the lab. I use the "ltsp-build-client --fat-client" command on Ubuntu to build the image,