On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:05:50PM -0500, Scott Balneaves wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:21:55PM -0400, Dan Maranville wrote:
Gotta love it that Long Term Support. Trust me it will not be the last
time you curse it. /rant
I'm really unsure as to why Ubuntu gets all this hate directed
Works just fine with Jaunty. Unfortunately no backports - yeah means
certainly a lot of work.
2009/4/24 Peter Stein peterstei...@googlemail.com:
Ok, I added the line as suggest to reenable the non-removable device
support. It doesn't really matter for us if users can access the thin
clients'
Gotta love it that Long Term Support. Trust me it will not be the last
time you curse it. /rant
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:23, Peter Stein peterstei...@googlemail.com wrote:
Works just fine with Jaunty. Unfortunately no backports - yeah means
certainly a lot of work.
--
Dan Maranville
http://laserjock.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/sru-needs-you/
=)
Dan Maranville wrote:
Gotta love it that Long Term Support. Trust me it will not be the last
time you curse it. /rant
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:23, Peter Stein peterstei...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Works just fine with
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:21:55PM -0400, Dan Maranville wrote:
Gotta love it that Long Term Support. Trust me it will not be the last
time you curse it. /rant
I'm really unsure as to why Ubuntu gets all this hate directed against them
because they don't backport new features from more current
I'm really unsure as to why Ubuntu gets all this hate directed against them
because they don't backport new features from more current releases into older
ones. As far as I know, LTSP current isn't being backported into either
Fedora
3 or Debian Sarge.
LTS means they fix the security and
...Or, as an alternative to installing the latest greatest, you could
actually help backport these features into LTS.
Community success requires community involvement. Period.
Cheers,
Jordan/Lns
Dan Maranville wrote:
I'm really unsure as to why Ubuntu gets all this hate directed against
I am going to leave it with this:
I didn't speak of LTSP in any negative way, I was simply making a
statement about _MY_ experiences with the current LTS (bugs in this
instance). Some are related to LTSP but not always, most are problems
known about for greater than 1 year in mainline Ubuntu. If
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 05:22:22PM -0400, Dan Maranville wrote:
It is because they recommend you install the latest non-lts to see if
your problems are fixed. Period.
Well, that's a valid request to see if the issues been fixed in newer versions.
Either:
1) It DOES work in newer versions, and
Ok, I added the line as suggest to reenable the non-removable device
support. It doesn't really matter for us if users can access the thin
clients' HD. However, I was not able to access the external hard
drive.
I tried on the workstation: ltspfsmounter /tmp add and got a drive
mounted in
Dear LTSP users,
my LTSP 5 gets better, but still needs some kind of attention. This
time: External hard drives. Currently I use LTSP 5 on a Ubuntu 8.04
(hardy for the thin client's OS, but Debian Etch for the
workstations). We have auto mount for USB flash drives. That works
impeccably. But I
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Peter Stein wrote:
my LTSP 5 gets better, but still needs some kind of attention. This
time: External hard drives. Currently I use LTSP 5 on a Ubuntu 8.04
(hardy for the thin client's OS, but Debian Etch for the
workstations). We have auto mount for
12 matches
Mail list logo
