RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Network Load Balancing

2003-08-31 Thread Julius Szelagiewicz
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Sawan Gupta wrote: > But we have extra machines that we would like to use as a Network Load > Balancing. > > Currently we cannot arrange to buy a new RAM and also in near future we > will be increasing the number of nodes to 100+. In that case we would > not prefer a single poi

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Network Load Balancing

2003-08-31 Thread Andy Rabagliati
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Sawan Gupta wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the suggestion. > But we have extra machines that we would like to use as a Network Load > Balancing. > > Currently we cannot arrange to buy a new RAM and also in near future we > will be increasing the number of nodes to 100+. In t

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Network Load Balancing

2003-08-31 Thread Sawan Gupta
(I mean a single server). What in that case can be done? Regards, Sawan Gupta || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || -Original Message- From: Ken Cobler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 8:56 PM To: Sawan Gupta Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Network Load Balancing Sawan Gupta

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Network Load Balancing

2003-08-30 Thread Julius Szelagiewicz
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Sawan Gupta wrote: > I have installed LTSP package for my Institute Labs. > Our server Config is > P IV 1.7 GHz > 128 MB RAM > RHL 7.3 > > The number of clients currently is 3 which we wish to increase to 20. > I would like to know the available methods for load balancing of th