Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Re: Upgrade to ltsp 3.0 a risk? Re: floppy su

2002-02-11 Thread Martin Herweg
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: >This seem quite non-unix-like to me. they did not have many soundcards in the 70s ;-) > Should this not be solved system-wise in the kernel? > Using some wrapper-program seems like a hack. it is. I think the problem is, that there is not one solution for network-so

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Re: Upgrade to ltsp 3.0 a risk? Re: floppy su

2002-02-09 Thread John McCreesh
On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 14:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 07-Feb-02 Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > > As a newcomer here I wonder why floppy support and > > sound support is not an integral part of the LTSP package. > > It is some of the first things I am asked when I talk > > to people about LTSP.

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Re: Upgrade to ltsp 3.0 a risk? Re: floppy su

2002-02-09 Thread wouter . debacker
On 07-Feb-02 Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > As a newcomer here I wonder why floppy support and > sound support is not an integral part of the LTSP package. > It is some of the first things I am asked when I talk > to people about LTSP. IMHO that depends on which kind of people you are talking to an