Re: [Luarocks-developers] luarocks 3.0 whish list

I would love to see #2. -- Regards, Ryan On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Xpol Wan wrote: > > I have some wished features for luarocks 3.0: > >1. unified rockspec name, rahter than foo-x.y.z-1.rockspec, how about >just rockspec orrockfile, ( this goes further than #489 >

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Error in rocks.moonscript.org

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:12 PM, leaf corcoran wrote: > Everything should be responsive now. Essentially I had a caching layer > but it was causing zip manifests to be cached incomplete a while ago. I > disabled it to look into later, but never had a chance. There seem to be a > lot more people u

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Error in rocks.moonscript.org

Leaf, On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:39 PM, leaf corcoran wrote: > It went down, I'm investigating. Look's like the server got hit with a lot > of requests. It's back up now but I'm still looking into why this happened. > I am having a lot of issues as well. Mainly from luarocks and not just loading

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Orbit Release and Not Allowed to Upload Rockspec

Hi Fabio, On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Fabio Mascarenhas wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Hisham wrote: > > I don't know if a project can have multiple owners in MoonRocks > > (Leaf?). Right now Orbit is owned by the default "luarocks" account, > > which means that, as a developer

Re: [Luarocks-developers] LuaLogging 1.3.0-1 fails to unpack

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Philipp Janda wrote: > Am 12.08.2014 um 20:47 schrieb RJP Computing: > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Philipp Janda > wrote: > > > >> Am 12.08.2014 um 16:37 schrieb Ryan Pusztai: > >>> LuaLogging 1.3.0-1 fails to

Re: [Luarocks-developers] LuaLogging 1.3.0-1 fails to unpack

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Philipp Janda wrote: > Am 12.08.2014 um 16:37 schrieb Ryan Pusztai: > > LuaLogging 1.3.0-1 fails to unpack or install on Ubuntu 14.04 amd64. > > > > I run `luarocks install lualogging` and get > > ``` > > $ sudo luarocks install lualogging > > Installing > > http

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Git tags with '.' in them fail

Hi Hisham, On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Hisham wrote: > On 10 June 2014 15:18, Ryan Pusztai wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I hope this is not known, but I am writting a new rockspec and created a > > "release"/tag on GitHub named 'v2.0' and added it in my rockspec as > > `source.tag="v2.0"` and I g

Re: [Luarocks-developers] MoonRocks help

Hi Leaf, On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:15 PM, leaf corcoran wrote: > The old version of the module was still in the manifest and prevented > you from adding yours. The claiming functionality is only for people > to claim modules that they already have ownership of, not for taking > over orphaned mo

Re: [Luarocks-developers] LuaZip rock seems to be broken

Hi Hisham, On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Hisham wrote: > [snip] > > > > I have forked it > > > > https://github.com/rjpcomputing/luazip > > > > I committed the changes and updated the version number where I found it > > (docs, _VERSION, etc) > > > > I tagged the release as 'v1_2_4' keeping wit

Re: [Luarocks-developers] LuaZip rock seems to be broken

Hi Hisham, On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Hisham wrote: > > [snip] > > > > This fixes it. Can this be fixed in the repository? I am using luarocks > to > > dploy to many computers so I don't want to update the makefile each time. > > plus this is just broken for all users. > > As far as I can

Re: [Luarocks-developers] LuaZip rock seems to be broken

Hi Ignacio, On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Ignacio Burgueño wrote: > I think this is because the makefile is building a library (zip.so.1.2.3) > which is copied to '/usr/local/lib/luarocks/rocks/luazip/1.2.3-2/lib' > and then creates a symbolic link to it (zip.so), but that folder is removed >

Re: [Luarocks-developers] MoonRocks is the default on git now

Hi Hisham, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Hisham wrote: > > Is anyone using the `luarocks-admin add` and `luarocks-admin remove` > commands to manage their own repos? I use it with rsync to manage the > luarocks.org repositories, but that code is not the prettiest part of > LuaRocks (and I've b

Re: [Luarocks-developers] luajson package possibly broken

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Philipp Janda wrote: > Am 26.02.2014 17:55 schröbte RJP Computing: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Philipp Janda > wrote: > >> > >> For the record, I have successfully installed luajson-1.3.2-1 on Ubuntu >

Re: [Luarocks-developers] luajson package possibly broken

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Philipp Janda wrote: > > For the record, I have successfully installed luajson-1.3.2-1 on Ubuntu > 13.10 x86_64 a few minutes ago. > That is good to know > The error message from above comes from `luarocks/fetch.lua:126` and > indicates that the actual unpackin

Re: [Luarocks-developers] luajson package possibly broken

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Hisham wrote: > On 26 February 2014 12:08, RJP Computing wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Thijs Schreijer < > th...@thijsschreijer.nl> > > wrote: > >> > >> Like Hisham mentioned, `--verbose` is _really_ verbo

Re: [Luarocks-developers] luajson package possibly broken

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Thijs Schreijer wrote: > > Like Hisham mentioned, `--verbose` is _really_ verbose (it spits out all > underlying shell commands used including the results), the output here is > far too little for that option. I don't know whether older versions of LR > choke on unk

Re: [Luarocks-developers] luajson package possibly broken

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Hisham wrote: > When a .src.rock is available in the server that is used by default, > and it already contains the sources, so there's no need to go through > git. > Good to know. I figured that is how it worked. > $ sudo luarocks install luajson > > Installing

Re: [Luarocks-developers] luajson package possibly broken

I tried the one available in Ubuntu 13.10 APT repo which is 2.0.8. I then uninstalled it and installed the latest official release (2.1.2) and it did the exact same thing. So... I am not sure but I looked at the source.url line in the rockspec and it has "git://" does that mean that it will use 'g

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Raspberry Pi GPIO rockspec

I am very happy about this module. Thanks for creating it. I am not ready to use it yet, but I am excited to try it out an a "spare-time" project I have coming up. -- Regards, Ryan On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Thijs Schreijer wrote: > Attached an SCM rockspec for a GPIO module for the Rasp

Re: [Luarocks-developers] wsapi-xavante rock installing cvs version of wsapi

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Hisham wrote: > > Will this work when I am only calling `luarocks install wsapi-xavante` > and > > the dependencies are being triggered to actually install wsapi? > > In the current implementation, if you ran `luarocks install > wsapi-xavante 1.5-1` it would pick

Re: [Luarocks-developers] wsapi-xavante rock installing cvs version of wsapi

Hi Hisham, On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Hisham wrote: > ... > > The WSAPI rockspec from http://luarocks.org/repositories/rocks/ has > been > > recently uploaded with cvs-4 version and it does not play nice with the > > other modules because those don't contain the cvs versions. Hope this >

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Orbit cvs rockspec update

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:58 PM, RJP Computing wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use the latest cvs rockspec for the Orbit frame work and > the one in the cvs repo is old. Can you update it to the latest one in the > GitHub project? > > https://github.com/keplerproject/orbit

[Luarocks-developers] LuaSQL-Postgres cvs rockspec not working

Hi, After installing luasql-postgres on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64 The module is not require-able. It throws the error below. Lua 5.1.4 Copyright (C) 1994-2008 Lua.org, PUC-Rio > require("luasql.postgres") error loading module 'luasql.postgres' from file '.../Desktop/Insight/sandbox/lib/lua/5.1/luasql/

[Luarocks-developers] Orbit cvs rockspec update

Hi, I am trying to use the latest cvs rockspec for the Orbit frame work and the one in the cvs repo is old. Can you update it to the latest one in the GitHub project? https://github.com/keplerproject/orbit/blob/master/rockspec/orbit-cvs-2.rockspec -- Regards, Ryan -

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Project-local LR installations

Jim, On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Jim Whitehead II wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Doug Currie wrote: > > > > On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Jim Whitehead II wrote: > > > >> Here's a first attempt. I had to put in special logic to fix the > >> llvm/gcc-4.2 issue on mac os x, took me a

Re: [Luarocks-developers] Project-local LR installations

Hi Jim, On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Jim Whitehead II wrote: > I'm the huge proponent of installing sandboxed versions of > lua/luarocks together for each project. It ensures that changes you > make to one project do not affect another. The current scripts I use > for this is here: > > https:

[Luarocks-developers] LuaSQL rockspecs in cvs repo

Hi, I was wondering if all the drivers for LuaSQL could be ported to the main stable LuaRocks repository? I am specifically looking for PostreSQL support, but I noticed it was available in the cvs repo and thought that was strange. Any ideas? Or can they just be updated to use a static location fo