as if Netfilter and iptables were separate items. Is it possible to have
Netfilter
installed but not have iptables installed?
Yes. iptables is a sort of frontend for netfilter.
--Ray
So could this be my problem? What would it look like if I had iptables but not
netfilter installed?
I've not really used monmotha's script, forwarding to him...
--Ray
I've followed Warren's walkthrough of MonMotha's firewall script found at
http://www.mplug.org/phpwiki/index.php/BasicFirewallRouter.
I installed the script on a computer running redhat 7.3. The only change I made
was that I
I have a bunch of old associates who are very interested in trying Linux
but could never gather the courage to install a non-Windows system on
their machines.
Perhaps a web-based thin client system will be the easiest way for them
to experience KDE/GNOME and test some of the applications in
When dual-booting with Win98, of course, Windows must be in the first
partition. However, I remember this (i.e., the Windows be in the first
partition) is not necessary with Win2000.
Does anyone know whether I can put WinXP Pro in a non-first partition?
Just got a copy of Red Hat 8.0 Bible from Barns Noble. This books
has been written and re-written at least half a dozen times, and, as a
result, is quite good.
Obviously, even with more than 1,000 pages, no books with a such general
scope can cover detailed info. But for introduction,
It's not that I don't want to answer your question, but if you use Red
Hat 8.0, the answer should be very obvious.
DeanFujioka wrote:
On Monday 04 November 2002 10:10 pm, you wrote:
2. The new generations of Linux distributions (e.g., Red Hat 8.0,
Mandrake 9.0, Xandros 1.0, etc.) now
I have a bunch of old associates who are very interested in trying Linux
but could never gather the courage to install a non-Windows system on
their machines.
Perhaps a web-based thin client system will be the easiest way for them
to experience KDE/GNOME and test some of the applications in
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
I have a bunch of old associates who are very interested in trying
Linux but could never gather
the courage to install a non-Windows system on their machines. Perhaps
a web-based thin client
system will be the easiest way for them to experience KDE/GNOME and
test
A friend of mine developed a system which runs Linux thin clients on a
Win2000 server. He couldn't sell even a single copy and very quickly
went out of business.
Why? Most private Windows users don't have to pay for their software
(which either came with the machine or is pirated). But this
Gasp... And I come out of lurking. You might want to recommend demolinux to
them... Its basically a full linux install on CD. You just boot it up and
it runs off a ramdrive. I've introduced a few people to linux using it.
On 11/7/02 10:53 AM, Randall Oshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a
Brian,
Sure, just let me know when you want to come get it. We have I think six
21 fixed freq sun monitors. I am in Kaneohe near Temple Valley.
Dusty
239-1772
Aloha Dusty,
Can I get a hold of one of the Sun Monitors?
Thanks,
Brian
Brian Low
Security X
1515 Nuuanu Ave. #555
Ray Strode wrote:
Ray: Might want to check your clock :)
It's 11/06/2002, not 12/06/2002 :)
--MonMotha
pgpOvkxOMHLOS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Ray: Might want to check your clock :)
Yea i don't know what's up with me and my
clocks. Fixed now.
--Ray
Perhaps something like www.workspot.com?
Workspot uses Debian and provides access to a KDE desktop via vnc.
Their setup seems to be pretty straight forward - the web form allows you to set
all the vncserver parameters and then run the vncserver as your username.
Perhaps a web-based thin
I don't know about putting it in a non-first partition but I've seen two
different ways to do it. The first is to make an image of the linux
bootsector and put it in the windows root drive and point to it with
boot.ini... It takes some work and I've only got it to work using FAT32.
The second way
Thanks. I think you just answered the first part of my question, in
that I should be able to install WinXP Pro in any of the three primary
partitions. If this is not correct, please let me know.
(It should be noted that although textbooks say that there are four
primary partitions, since
I remember someone here might have mentioned this before (or maybe not),
but does anyone know anything about knoppix?
http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html
What is KNOPPIX??
KNOPPIX is a bootable CD with a collection of GNU/Linux
http://www.knopper.net/linux/ software, automatic hardware detection,
and support for many graphics cards, sound cards, SCSI and USB devices
and other peripherals. KNOPPIX can be used as a Linux demo, educational
On 11/7/02 7:05 PM, W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I think you just answered the first part of my question, in
that I should be able to install WinXP Pro in any of the three primary
partitions. If this is not correct, please let me know.
(It should be noted that although
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
What is KNOPPIX??
KNOPPIX is a bootable CD with a collection of GNU/Linux
http://www.knopper.net/linux/ software, automatic hardware
detection, and support for many graphics cards, sound cards, SCSI and
USB devices and other peripherals. KNOPPIX can be used as a
I forgot to mention the question that I really meant to post:
Can we (or do we know anyone who has been able to) squeeze Red Hat 8 or
Mandrake 9 into a KNOPPIX-like bootable CD?
Cliff Brown wrote:
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
What is KNOPPIX??
KNOPPIX is a bootable CD with a collection of
Bootable is not good enough. It must be both bootable AND runnable.
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
I forgot to mention the question that I really meant to post:
Can we (or do we know anyone who has been able to) squeeze Red Hat 8
or Mandrake 9 into a KNOPPIX-like bootable CD?
Cliff Brown wrote:
On 7 Nov 2002, Eric Hattemer wrote:
I am thoroughly confused at this email. First, when you say dual
booting, are you refering to two versions of Windows? If not, then
there is almost no order required.
I am taking a Win2K course from Aaron Tanaka at HCC and he says that you
put the oldest
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 23:13, Brandon Jasper wrote:
Windows will generally try to install its own bootloader NTLDR in the MBR,
NT and 2k does so I expect XP would do so as well.
Yeah, winxp almost certainly will rewrite the MBR.
On 11/7/02 7:05 PM, W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
24 matches
Mail list logo