On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 01:37, Warren Togami wrote:
> Note that my roadrunner cable modem has been great over the years. The
> first year was terrible with weeks of downtime because of poor wiring in
> my area, but after that was overhauled I've had very few problems. I
> used to get as much as 700
On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 14:08, Virgil wrote:
> Are you talking about Lavanet's frame relay services? Maybe if you want more
> you can boost it up to more than 5gb a month? I don't speak for lavanet but
> I know they are a little bit more flexible in this area and provide you with
> good service compa
Are you talking about Lavanet's frame relay services? Maybe if you want more
you can boost it up to more than 5gb a month? I don't speak for lavanet but
I know they are a little bit more flexible in this area and provide you with
good service compared to the others.
Virgil
> LavaNet also gives y
LavaNet also gives you a 5gb of bandwidth per month. I would use that
in a week. Something I just realized is that Oceanic offers static
IPs, and at prices that compete the Flex, save that they only begin
offering 768k upload speeds at $180 / month, which is nearly twice
Flex.
Oh well, I've been w
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:47:06AM -1000, Randall Oshita wrote:
> If you really need good speeds and DSL is the right price you
> might want to consider an ISP service such as Century Computers
> that peers with HIX, Time Warner etc.. they have a list.
To clarify, the HIX is the Hawaii Internet E
Hoang
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [luau] Road Runner Vs. DSL revisited
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:41:26AM -1000,
Michael_Bishop/FARRINCS/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From my research and my experience. DSL is slower, but has a
> consistent download/
Randall Oshita wrote:
If you really need good speeds and DSL is the right price you might want
to consider an ISP service such as Century Computers that peers with
HIX, Time Warner etc.. they have a list. If your upper is also on
Century they can peer you privately so your connection does not ev
Vince Hoang wrote:
...
The more traffic over a circuit, the more latency is incured.
If you measure too often, you cause more latency for yourself
and others. Imagine if everyone decided to hit Google every
30 seconds. Google might have enough bandwidth to sustain the
impact, but networks on th
Vince Hoang wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:41:26AM -1000, Michael_Bishop/FARRINCS/[EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
From my research and my experience. DSL is slower, but has a
consistent download/upload time. Road Runner is faster on the
download, but it has lag which can be horrible is your gaming
>>I'm actually doing this very thing, right now. We currently have
>>RoadRunner, and are switching to a 768/768k plan for DSL, with one
>>static IP. It's really the static IP that sold me, though, as
>>RoadRunner doesn't offer that, to the best of my knowledge.
>>
Dude with the RR business class,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:48:12AM -1000, Chris Stark wrote:
> Maybe try NetSaint (now called Nagios) for network uptime
> monitoring. It can be a little tricky to set up, but it can
> probably do anything you need it to.
Has Nagios improve its trending? Nagios out of the box is/was
best at monito
"John S. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: [luau] Road Runner Vs. DSL revisited
I'm actually doing this very thing, right now. We currently have
RoadRunner, and are switching to a 768/768k plan for DSL, with one
static IP. It's really the static IP that s
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:41:26AM -1000, Michael_Bishop/FARRINCS/[EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
> From my research and my experience. DSL is slower, but has a
> consistent download/upload time. Road Runner is faster on the
> download, but it has lag which can be horrible is your gaming
> or doing realt
stimmy
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 11:19 AM
To: John S. Johnson
Subject: Re: [luau] Road Runner Vs. DSL revisited
I'm actually doing this very thing, right now. We currently have
RoadRunner, and are switching to a 768/768k plan for DSL, with one
static IP. It's really the static IP th
I'm actually doing this very thing, right now. We currently have
RoadRunner, and are switching to a 768/768k plan for DSL, with one
static IP. It's really the static IP that sold me, though, as
RoadRunner doesn't offer that, to the best of my knowledge.
I do think that we will be sacrificing downl
> There are also some free programs that can help tweak your connection,
> which I've tried with no real gains.
squid's free :]
-ho'ala
John S. Johnson wrote:
...I was wondering if there were any nifty network tools available to
measure connection downtime and connection speed. I have heard of
connection speed analyzers before, but never anything that would
check connection downtime. I would appreciate any suggestions. Thank
. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@videl.ics.hawaii.edu on 04/23/2003
10:39:15 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:[luau] Road Runner Vs. DSL revisited
I have a question that, although not Linux-specific, is on
I have a question that, although not Linux-specific, is one that generated a
lot of discussion in this forum before. I have been a faithful user of Oceanic
Road Runner since the beginning. In the old days you had to sign up for basic
cable and road runner together for a total of about $50 to $60
19 matches
Mail list logo
