Re: [luau] samba spanking

2002-09-11 Thread MonMotha
R. Scott Belford wrote: Firewall. Did I mention that I had monmotha's firewall on the 7.2 boxes? I had enabled port 139, but, no go. Just a little while a go I decided to flush the chains. On the one hand, and to the dismay of about 25 users, this shut down the interface to all traffic.

Re: [luau] samba spanking

2002-09-11 Thread R. Scott Belford
MonMotha wrote: R. Scott Belford wrote: Firewall. Did I mention that I had monmotha's firewall on the 7.2 boxes? I had enabled port 139, but, no go. Just a little while a go I decided to flush the chains I was suddenly able to browse the shares, from everywhere. NetBIOS name

[luau] samba spanking

2002-09-10 Thread R. Scott Belford
I am introducing a new samba server to our network. It is running on rhat 7.2. It is version 2.2.1a. I have a second samba server that I am adding. It is also running redhat 7.2, but I have upgraded it to version 2.2.5. My intent is to replace an older samba server on the network. It is

Re: [luau] samba spanking

2002-09-10 Thread Ray Strode
I am introducing a new samba server to our network. It is running on rhat 7.2. It is version 2.2.1a. I have a second samba server that I am adding. It is also running redhat 7.2, but I have upgraded it to version 2.2.5. My intent is to replace an older samba server on the network. It is

Re: [luau] samba spanking

2002-09-10 Thread R. Scott Belford
Firewall. Did I mention that I had monmotha's firewall on the 7.2 boxes? I had enabled port 139, but, no go. Just a little while a go I decided to flush the chains. On the one hand, and to the dismay of about 25 users, this shut down the interface to all traffic. Once resolved, though, I was