Le samedi 26 février 2011 à 23:24 -0300, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset a
écrit :
Finally understood what you mean: Those packages affect every
libnotify action! And i must say they get way nicer... wich process
should i check to see if it's heavier than before??
Only pidgin I think, and all RAM
Le dimanche 27 février 2011 à 17:38 -0300, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset a
écrit :
There's no difference in with or wihtout it!! The system runs as
perfect as before ;) Even better: those packages fix a little problem
i did have with libnotify (when the balloon where drawed as a comic
balloon,
Finally understood what you mean:
Those packages affect every libnotify action! And i must say they get way
nicer... wich process should i check to see if it's heavier than before??
2011/2/25 Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset jpx...@gmail.com
2011/2/25 Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com
Le jeudi 24
Hai everyone,
Agreed the screensaver shouldn't be energy consuming, it should be the
opposite.
I like Mod4 + L for locking btw.
Cheers, Chris Druif
I like
2011/2/25 Marcelo Zacarias da Silva marc...@ciagri.usp.br
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:08:32PM -0500, Jorge Andrés Alvarez Oré wrote:
The
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 23:32 -0300, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset a
écrit :
Do you have the difference between the 2 notifications, with
and without pidgin-libnotify ?
Can't really tell any difference... so i ran pidgin with and without
it and there's no difference seeing it
2011/2/25 Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 23:32 -0300, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset a
écrit :
Can't really tell any difference... so i ran pidgin with and without
it and there's no difference seeing it with xfce4-taskmanager
It's more about the visual between the
On 02/23/2011 07:53 PM, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset wrote:
Since Lubuntu uses libnotify for NM, transmission, power-management
Gnome-Mplayer I would like to make a very humble suggestion package to
be included on lubuntu: pidgin-libnotify. It would be nice to have an
unified looking desktop.
Since Lubuntu uses libnotify for NM, transmission, power-management
Gnome-Mplayer I would like to make a very humble suggestion package to
be included on lubuntu: pidgin-libnotify. It would be nice to have an
unified looking desktop. I'm testing it since a few days and it works
great
Lubuntu team:
Since Lubuntu is targeted for low-spec computers, xcreensaver is not a good
choice to use since it causes problems such as:
- In my three (old) machines I must kill the xcreensaver daemon in order to
be able to install the system.
- The idea is to make a good-looking effect but with
Haven't screen-savers been around forever? Should most hardware be able to
handle them? Does Lubuntu need to be stripped down further?
I sort of think that many users expect a screen-saver built into their OS. I
know my mother-in-law loves them for some reason. :) Personally, I have no
use for
The first time that i installed Lubuntu I've surprised when see that the
default screensaver consume 60-70% of my processor. So i deactivated it. For
me turn off the monitor in x minutes is enough. Lubuntu is not only for slow
machine, it's a energy saving OS too. In the lubuntu.net home page say
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 14:06 -0300, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset a
écrit :
... and it depends on: libindicate-gtk2 libindicate4 (180kb both
installed)
Hum, I don't see them by default on my Natty system. And it probably
means that those library will be loaded. But, there are relative to
And it probably means that those library will be loaded.
That's correct :) (that's why i've posted the kb from each package)
Do you have the difference between the 2 notifications, with and without
pidgin-libnotify ?
Can't really tell any difference... so i ran pidgin with and without it
I have never seen a justifiable reason for there existence apart from
locking the machine if required.
Personally, i never lock the screen but i'm asuming that's a feature
needed.
Also, I hate screen locks on my machines. I would NOT want my screen to
lock every time it went blank.
Team:
Since Lubuntu uses libnotify for NM, transmission, power-management
Gnome-Mplayer I would like to make a very humble suggestion package to be
included on lubuntu: pidgin-libnotify. It would be nice to have an unified
looking desktop. I'm testing it since a few days and it works great so
I defectively agree, chrome is a good choice, in condition that it's
operational by the time of 10.4
for the case it's not - I'd like to have your opinion regarding arora, I
really find it mean and lean.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Sylkis syl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/15 mehageg
You'll find most users simply will not use anything else other than firefox
(sad but true) So will more than likely install it anyway due to ignorance
or some form of loyalty, despite its massive shortcomings (like ridiculous
ram usage)
I personally use Chromium and believe there is a time when
On 16/11/2009, Andrew Woodhead andrew.woodhead...@googlemail.com wrote:
You'll find most users simply will not use anything else other than firefox
(sad but true) So will more than likely install it anyway due to ignorance
or some form of loyalty, despite its massive shortcomings (like
sory I send the message to wrong adress earlier
2009/11/16 Sylkis syl...@gmail.com
2009/11/16 Zsolt Peter Basak shiki.biomer...@gmail.com
Hello!
Chrome is fast, but its not that lightweight. Check its memory usage. The
Chrome/Chromium without Google features is called SRware Iron and
Hi,
yes, I am also having the discussion about browsers. I agree, we need
a more lightweight browser.
At the moment I have not seen a browser that is convincing. We have
talked about this in Taiwan as well, but no solution yet. We need to
test suggestions like your one.
In Taiwan some said, the
2009/11/15 mehageg meha...@nana.co.il
as lubuntu is a fast-lightweight version of ubuntu, maybe it's time to
consider using arora http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/arora instead
of firefox as the main web-browser.
from my personal experience, arora fits very well as my main browser, it
21 matches
Mail list logo
