DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32674] - MultiFieldQueryParser and BooleanQuery do not provide adequate support for queries across multiple fields

2004-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32674] - MultiFieldQueryParser and BooleanQuery do not provide adequate support for queries across multiple fields

2004-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: do we need two FAQs?

2004-12-19 Thread Murray Altheim
Otis Gospodnetic wrote: OK. Is this _really_ what everyone's okay with? I'm asking because once we put the FAQ onto Wiki we: 1. no longer have authoritative FAQ - anyone can write to the FAQ 2. we have to monitor the Wiki FAQ for correctness 3. we have no user-friendly GUI/webapp for Q/A formattin

Re: do we need two FAQs?

2004-12-19 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
OK. Is this _really_ what everyone's okay with? I'm asking because once we put the FAQ onto Wiki we: 1. no longer have authoritative FAQ - anyone can write to the FAQ 2. we have to monitor the Wiki FAQ for correctness 3. we have no user-friendly GUI/webapp for Q/A formatting, which makes it more

Re: Migration to SVN?

2004-12-19 Thread Garrett Rooney
Henri Yandell wrote: I'd like to see it be in the same subproject directory somehow; something like: asf-repo/ jakarta/ lucene/ tags/ branches/ trunk/ sandbox/ tags/ branches/ trunk/ though that's a bit ugly. My main aim is to keep the jakart

Re: Migration to SVN?

2004-12-19 Thread Henri Yandell
I'd like to see it be in the same subproject directory somehow; something like: asf-repo/ jakarta/ lucene/ tags/ branches/ trunk/ sandbox/ tags/ branches/ trunk/ though that's a bit ugly. My main aim is to keep the jakarta directory simple

cvs commit: jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index FieldInfos.java

2004-12-19 Thread dnaber
dnaber 2004/12/19 08:25:40 Modified:src/java/org/apache/lucene/index FieldInfos.java Log: fixing typo in javadoc Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +2 -1 jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldInfos.java Index: FieldInfos.java =

cvs commit: jakarta-lucene CHANGES.txt

2004-12-19 Thread bmesser
bmesser 2004/12/19 07:23:32 Modified:.CHANGES.txt Log: document the FieldInfos change Revision ChangesPath 1.135 +4 -1 jakarta-lucene/CHANGES.txt Index: CHANGES.txt === RCS file: /ho

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19058] - [PATCH] Reader getFieldNames returns an extra blank field name

2004-12-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-lucene/src/test-deprecated/org/apache/lucene/index TestIndexReader.java

2004-12-19 Thread bmesser
bmesser 2004/12/19 06:59:33 Modified:src/test-deprecated/org/apache/lucene/index TestIndexReader.java Log: make deprecated test work again with bug fix in Reader getFieldNames Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +2 -2 jakarta-lucene/src/test-depre

cvs commit: jakarta-lucene/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index TestSegmentReader.java TestIndexReader.java TestFieldInfos.java

2004-12-19 Thread bmesser
bmesser 2004/12/19 06:58:49 Modified:src/test/org/apache/lucene/index TestSegmentReader.java TestIndexReader.java TestFieldInfos.java Log: make tests work again with bug fix in Reader getFieldNames Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +2 -2 jakarta

cvs commit: jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index FieldInfos.java

2004-12-19 Thread bmesser
bmesser 2004/12/19 06:55:48 Modified:src/java/org/apache/lucene/index FieldInfos.java Log: do not longer return an extra blank field in Reader getFieldNames PR:19085 Obtained from: Mark Harwood Submitted by: Bernhard Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +33 -9 jakart

Re: do we need two FAQs?

2004-12-19 Thread Daniel Naber
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 02:23, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > jGuru can provide XML dump of a FAQ, and I believe I can obtain it, if > you want to use that to seed the Wiki FAQ. Could you try to get that XML for me? I'll then semi-automatically import it to the existing "FAQ" page in our wiki. R

[Jakarta Lucene Wiki] Updated: FrontPage

2004-12-19 Thread lucene-cvs
Date: 2004-12-19T04:36:32 Editor: DanielNaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Jakarta Lucene Wiki Page: FrontPage URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/FrontPage remove pages no nobody uses Change Log: -

[Jakarta Lucene Wiki] Updated: LuceneImplementations

2004-12-19 Thread lucene-cvs
Date: 2004-12-19T04:31:44 Editor: DanielNaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Jakarta Lucene Wiki Page: LuceneImplementations URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneImplementations link upate Change Log: --

Re: DefaultSimilarity 2.0?, benchmark

2004-12-19 Thread Paul Elschot
I just got the benchmark running here. It needs a library for the org.apache.commons.compress.tar package. I had to build that from cvs, so in case anyone needs it, I'll gladly send the jar or post it in bugzilla. Or did I miss the place to download a commons sandbox library? On Saturday 18 Decem

Re: Migration to SVN?

2004-12-19 Thread Erik Hatcher
+1 Would we convert the jakarta-lucene-sandbox separately also? Or Somehow merge it into a single SVN repository? We have different committers to each repository. Erik On Dec 18, 2004, at 11:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: (Just your friendly neighbourhood nudge) I think it would be a very