DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32887] - [PATCH] IOException: Cannot delete deletables

2005-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Jakarta Lucene Wiki] Updated: LuceneFAQ

2005-01-04 Thread lucene-cvs
Date: 2005-01-04T14:57:11 Editor: DanielNaber Wiki: Jakarta Lucene Wiki Page: LuceneFAQ URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@ -This FAQ is curren

RE: IOException on Windows XP -- Cannot delete deleteable

2005-01-04 Thread Wu, Daniel
> Thanks -- could you please recreate that patch with the -u option so that > the context is visible and then attach it to bug 32887 > (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32887)? The patch listed below. Will attach it to the bug once I got my account created. C:\lucene-1.4.3\src\

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31841] - [PATCH] MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq()

2005-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32053] - sort while using MultiSearcher

2005-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Jakarta Lucene Wiki] Updated: LuceneFAQ

2005-01-04 Thread lucene-cvs
Date: 2005-01-04T14:47:22 Editor: DanielNaber Wiki: Jakarta Lucene Wiki Page: LuceneFAQ URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ no comment Change Log: -- @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ Does Mu

[Jakarta Lucene Wiki] Updated: LuceneFAQ

2005-01-04 Thread lucene-cvs
Date: 2005-01-04T14:43:18 Editor: DanielNaber Wiki: Jakarta Lucene Wiki Page: LuceneFAQ URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ no comment Change Log: -- @@ -110,6 +110,17 @@ * Increase t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32942] - Fuzzy query scoring issues

2005-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32942] New: - Fuzzy query scoring issues

2005-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: IOException on Windows XP -- Cannot delete deleteable

2005-01-04 Thread Daniel Naber
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 21:35, Wu, Daniel wrote: > I implemented the following patch to minimize the need to rename the > deleteable file and the IOException doesn't seem to happen any more. Thanks -- could you please recreate that patch with the -u option so that the context is visible and t

IOException on Windows XP -- Cannot delete deleteable

2005-01-04 Thread Wu, Daniel
I am using lucene-1.4.3 and keep getting IOException -- "Cannot delete deleteable" from FSDirectory.renameFile() method. It happens on both Sun JVM 1.4.2_05-b04 and 1.5.0-b64. Not sure if this has been addressed in the latest code. I implemented the following patch to minimize the need to rename

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32674] - [PATCH] MultiFieldQueryParser and BooleanQuery do not provide adequate support for queries across multiple fields

2005-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index MultiReader.java IndexReader.java

2005-01-04 Thread dnaber
dnaber 2005/01/04 11:25:01 Modified:src/java/org/apache/lucene/index MultiReader.java IndexReader.java Log: fixing some deprecated/see tags in the javadoc comments Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +2 -2 jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucen

Re: A "not" query question

2005-01-04 Thread Erik Hatcher
Or use IndexReader and find the document id's that contain the term you're avoiding, then access all the documents but those. Erik On Jan 4, 2005, at 1:39 PM, Scott Ganyo wrote: Nope, that's the way to do it. S On Jan 4, 2005, at 11:53 AM, George Aroush wrote: Hi folks, In Lucene, how can

Re: A "not" query question

2005-01-04 Thread Scott Ganyo
Nope, that's the way to do it. S On Jan 4, 2005, at 11:53 AM, George Aroush wrote: Hi folks, In Lucene, how can I retrieve all documents that don't match the term of my query? That is, I want all documents that don't have the word "CAT". The only way I can think of how to do it now is to create

[Jakarta Lucene Wiki] Updated: LuceneFAQ

2005-01-04 Thread lucene-cvs
Date: 2005-01-04T10:36:14 Editor: DanielNaber Wiki: Jakarta Lucene Wiki Page: LuceneFAQ URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ no comment Change Log: -- @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ * You are using

A "not" query question

2005-01-04 Thread George Aroush
Hi folks, In Lucene, how can I retrieve all documents that don't match the term of my query? That is, I want all documents that don't have the word "CAT". The only way I can think of how to do it now is to create a 'dummy' field which always contains a known value, say "1" and than build a query

Re: CFS file and file formats

2005-01-04 Thread Bernhard Messer
Doug Cutting schrieb: Bernhard Messer wrote: Why not implementing a small utility class, f.e CompoundFileUtil.java within the org.apache.lucene.index Package ? This class could be public and implement the necessary functionality. This is what i would prefer, because we don't have to change the v

cvs commit: jakarta-lucene-sandbox/contributions/javascript/queryValidator luceneQueryValidator.js

2005-01-04 Thread kelvint
kelvint 2005/01/04 07:38:49 Modified:contributions/javascript/queryValidator luceneQueryValidator.js Log: Escapes the / character for FireFox 1.0. Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +9 -9 jakarta-lucene-sandbox/contributions/javascript/queryValid

cvs commit: jakarta-lucene-sandbox/contributions/javascript/queryConstructor luceneQueryConstructor.js

2005-01-04 Thread kelvint
kelvint 2005/01/04 07:37:54 Modified:contributions/javascript/queryConstructor luceneQueryConstructor.js Log: Fixed appending of groupModifier even when it is a NO_MODIFIER. Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +2 -1 jakarta-lucene-sandbox/contribu

cvs commit: jakarta-lucene-sandbox/contributions/javascript/queryConstructor luceneQueryConstructor.html

2005-01-04 Thread kelvint
kelvint 2005/01/04 07:37:24 Modified:contributions/javascript/queryConstructor luceneQueryConstructor.html Log: Fixed display of results in Firefox 1.0. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +2 -2 jakarta-lucene-sandbox/contributions/javascript/quer

Re: auto-filters?

2005-01-04 Thread Paul Elschot
I'm replying to the Doug's first message, and I'll try and answer things brought forward later too. On Monday 03 January 2005 05:21, Doug Cutting wrote: > Filters are more efficient than query terms for many things. For > example, a RangeFilter is usually more efficient than a RangeQuery and > has

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32674] - MultiFieldQueryParser and BooleanQuery do not provide adequate support for queries across multiple fields

2005-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32674] - MultiFieldQueryParser and BooleanQuery do not provide adequate support for queries across multiple fields

2005-01-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Question about Lucene and index browsing

2005-01-04 Thread Andraz Skoric
LUKE http://www.getopt.org/luke/ lp, a Mariella Di Giacomo wrote: Hi ALL, We have just started using Lucene to index Digital Library information. I was wondering whether there is any feature in Lucene that could be used to "browse the indexed fields" (in practice be able to browse the indexes) for