[ANNOUNCE] Lucene4c 0.03

I'm happy to announce the release of version 0.03 of Lucene4c, a port of Lucene to the C language using the Apache Portable Runtime. This release adds several APIs for running operations over an entire index where previous versions only allowed you to do so with a single segment, improves a num

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33678] - More javadocs for Weight

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33678] New: - More javadocs for Weight

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Into javadocs? [Bug 31841] - [PATCH] MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq()

Paul Elschot wrote: Would you mind if some pieces of your reply end up in the javadocs? Not at all. Doug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Into javadocs? [Bug 31841] - [PATCH] MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq()

Doug, Would you mind if some pieces of your reply end up in the javadocs? Regards, Paul Elschot. On Monday 21 February 2005 18:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT >

Re: How to proceed with Bug 31841 - MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq() ?

Wolf Siberski wrote: Now I found another solution which requires more changes, but IMHO is much cleaner: - when a query computes its Weight, it caches it in an attribute - a query can be 'frozen'. A frozen query always returns the cached Weight when calling Query.weight(). Orignally there was no

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31841] - [PATCH] MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Fwd: [jira] Commented: (INFRA-199) Convert Lucene's Bugzilla to JIRA

Here's the status of my request to migrate to JIRA. So we'll be waiting for the upgrade before the migration. Erik Begin forwarded message: From: "Jeff Turner (JIRA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: February 20, 2005 9:19:48 PM EST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [jira] Commented: (INFRA-199)

Fwd: lucene.apache.org problems again

Looks like the issue has been resolved with the lucene.apache.org DNS. Erik Begin forwarded message: From: Ask Bjørn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: February 20, 2005 9:34:50 PM EST To: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subjec