Lucene.Net has my +1.
Other PMC members please cast your vote also.
As for Garrett's concerns, it is my understanding that dotLucene is not
based the previous Lucene.NET codebase. Though George mentions
Lookout, Beagle, and some other projects - are these projects using the
dotLucene
+1
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lucene Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Re: Incubating Lucene.Net
Lucene.Net has my +1.
Other PMC members please cast your vote also.
As for Garrett's concerns, it is my understanding that dotLucene is not
based the previous Lucene.NET codebase. Though George mentions Lookout,
Beagle, and some
+1
Otis
--- Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lucene.Net has my +1.
Other PMC members please cast your vote also.
As for Garrett's concerns, it is my understanding that dotLucene is
not
based the previous Lucene.NET codebase. Though George mentions
Lookout, Beagle, and some
Hi,
From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As for Lookout, Beagle, ets, I know for fact that Beagle,
Ascirum and .Text are using dotLucene, I don't know about
Lookout. Just do a Google them and you will see.
Lookout use Lucene.Net 1.3.3.1.
Pasha Bizhan
+1
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature